U.S. Military Dialogue Continues With Pakistan

WASHINGTON, Jan. 3, 2012 — The U.S. rela­tion­ship with Pak­istan is impor­tant, and mil­i­tary dia­logue between the coun­tries con­tin­ues despite recent seri­ous set­backs, Pen­ta­gon Press Sec­re­tary George Lit­tle said today.

The Unit­ed States has expressed deep regret over the NATO air strike that killed 24 Pak­istani sol­diers near Afghanistan’s bor­der with that nation Nov. 25–26, and offered to com­pen­sate the fam­i­lies of those killed and wound­ed in the inci­dent, but ground sup­ply routes through Pak­istan remained closed to coali­tion forces in Afghanistan.

“We con­duct­ed a thor­ough inves­ti­ga­tion into the bor­der inci­dent, we have acknowl­edged and take respon­si­bil­i­ty for the mis­takes we made on 25–26 Nov, [and] … we have expressed our deep­est regret to the Pak­istani peo­ple, to the fam­i­lies of those who were lost and those who were wound­ed,” Lit­tle said.

“We are hope­ful,” he added, “that our Pak­istani part­ners will reopen the ground sup­ply routes.”

Sup­plies are ade­quate to con­tin­ue the war effort in Afghanistan, Lit­tle said, adding that sup­plies are com­ing into Afghanistan through air routes and through the north­ern dis­tri­b­u­tion net­work, a series of com­mer­cial­ly based logis­tic arrange­ments con­nect­ing Baltic and Caspi­an ports with Afghanistan via Rus­sia, Cen­tral Asia and the Cau­ca­sus.

“The rela­tion­ship with Pak­istan is impor­tant on many lev­els. They’re an impor­tant part­ner, and we coop­er­ate with them on coun­tert­er­ror­ism and oth­er efforts,” the press sec­re­tary said.

“That being said, we know there have been rough patch­es, par­tic­u­lar­ly over the past year,” he added. “But it remains an essen­tial rela­tion­ship, and we’re com­mit­ted to improv­ing that rela­tion­ship over time.”

On Dec. 26, U.S. Cen­tral Com­mand released an unclas­si­fied ver­sion of an inves­ti­ga­tion report of the cross-bor­der inci­dent by its inves­ti­gat­ing offi­cer, Air Force Brig. Gen. Stephen Clark, direc­tor of plans, pro­grams, require­ments and assess­ments for Air Force Spe­cial Oper­a­tions Com­mand.

A copy of the report was deliv­ered to the Pak­istani gov­ern­ment, Lit­tle said. Pak­istani offi­cials were invit­ed to par­tic­i­pate in the inves­ti­ga­tion, but they declined.

Accord­ing to the report, on the night of Nov. 25–26, an Afghan army com­man­do com­pa­ny, part­nered with U.S. Army Spe­cial Forces, land­ed in the Khas Kunar dis­trict of Afghanistan’s Kunar province in an area of oper­a­tions assigned to the Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Force’s Region­al Com­mand East.

The ground forces were exe­cut­ing an oper­a­tion approved by ISAF Joint Com­mand head­quar­ters when they came under fire from posi­tions on a ridge near the Afghanistan-Pak­istan bor­der.

In self-defense, the report said, they used air sup­port to engage the ridge­line posi­tions.

The air engage­ment end­ed 90 min­utes lat­er and had includ­ed about 45 min­utes of fire. Even­tu­al­ly, it became clear from var­i­ous infor­ma­tion exchanges that those engaged at the ridge were Pak­istani mil­i­tary per­son­nel.

In the ear­ly hours of Nov. 26, the report said, sup­port­ing air­craft pulled back from the bor­der area and Pak­istani author­i­ties rein­forced their bor­der posi­tions and report­ed­ly removed 24 dead and 13 wound­ed.

Defense Sec­re­tary Leon E. Panet­ta has not had con­ver­sa­tions with his Pak­istani coun­ter­parts on the bor­der inci­dent report, Lit­tle said, although Army Gen. Mar­tin E. Dempsey, chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Marine Corps Gen. James N. Mat­tis, com­man­der of the U.S. Cen­tral Com­mand, both made con­tact with their Pak­istani coun­ter­parts imme­di­ate­ly after the inci­dent.

“And of course, we have [the Office of the Defense Rep­re­sen­ta­tive] in Islam­abad,” the press sec­re­tary added, which over­sees U.S.-Pakistan mil­i­tary rela­tions, includ­ing train­ing and equip­ment, “and mil­i­tary dia­logue con­tin­ues.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →