Australia — Stephen Smith on Afghanistan and insurgents, Defence Security Authority, Brett Woods

TOPICS: Pass­ing of Sergeant Brett Woods; Afghanistan and insur­gents; Defence Secu­ri­ty Author­i­ty.
Min­is­ter for Defence — Inter­view with Lyn­dall Cur­tis, ABC 24
LYNDAL CURTIS: Stephen Smith, wel­come to News 24.
STEPHEN SMITH: My plea­sure.
LYNDAL CURTIS: Does the death of Brett Wood change the Government’s atti­tude to Afghanistan? You said the last time you were in this stu­dio that you were a bit more opti­mistic about the prospects, but Sergeant Wood’s death must [indis­tinct] that opti­mism some­what.

STEPHEN SMITH: Well any death is a ter­ri­ble tragedy for the fam­i­ly con­cerned and it’s a ter­ri­ble blow to the nation. So the wind is always tak­en out of your sails when a tragedy and a fatal­i­ty occurs. 

But, as a gen­er­al propo­si­tion, we do believe we’ve made progress in the last 12 months; that we’ve con­sol­i­dat­ed some gains over the win­ter months. We’ve always known that we had to steal our­selves for the cur­rent north­ern sum­mer fight­ing sea­son and that fur­ther fatal­i­ties, fur­ther casu­al­ties were in prospect. And it’s deeply sad that it’s occurred so soon into the cur­rent fight­ing sea­son, but our resolve remains. We believe we’re on track to effect a tran­si­tion to Afghan-led secu­ri­ty respon­si­bil­i­ty in Uruz­gan Province by the end of 2014. And we are also — our own analy­sis is that applies equal­ly to Afghanistan generally.

LYNDAL CURTIS: Two oth­er sol­diers were injured seri­ous­ly in the inci­dent which killed Sergeant Brett Woods, and three oth­er sol­diers were injured in anoth­er inci­dent. Do you have an update on their condition?

STEPHEN SMITH: Well first­ly, on the three who were injured in the sep­a­rate inci­dent, they are all sat­is­fac­to­ry. At no stage were any of their injuries at the seri­ous; or very seri­ous lev­el. I’m very pleased to be able to indi­cate that the lat­est advice I have this morn­ing is that the two who are seri­ous­ly injured are now in a sat­is­fac­to­ry con­di­tion. They’re both in an Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Force med­ical facil­i­ty in Afghanistan, and so we’re now con­fi­dent that they will make a full recov­ery. That’s very good news, because they have var­i­ous­ly been list­ed as seri­ous­ly ill or very seri­ous­ly ill. So they’re now sat­is­fac­to­ry and sta­ble and that’s a very good thing for them and a great relief to their fam­i­lies and a great relief to us.

LYNDAL CURTIS: You say Aus­tralian troops — the forces are mak­ing ground in Afghanistan. There’s a report in the West Aus­tralian, which you may not have seen, that says Aus­tralian forces have killed around 1500 insur­gents in the last 12 months. Do you know if that fig­ure is fac­tu­al, if that’s the sort of scale of effort there’s been against the insurgents?

STEPHEN SMITH: Well first­ly, I need to say I’m high­ly embar­rassed that I haven’t seen that report in my own news­pa­per, the West Aus­tralian, so you’ve got me — you’ve got me on a bad day in that respect.

I think it’s impor­tant to make this point, which the Prime Min­is­ter made yes­ter­day; we have suf­fered, now, 24 ter­ri­ble fatal­i­ties. In a quan­ti­ta­tive sense, or mea­sure, the Tal­iban casu­al­ties are much larg­er. I don’t think it actu­al­ly helps to do that sta­tis­ti­cal analy­sis. I’m not run­ning away from it. What is more impor­tant than a sta­tis­ti­cal analy­sis is capac­i­ty to hold ground in a secu­ri­ty sense and then to be able to trans­fer that to Afghan secu­ri­ty forces, in par­tic­u­lar the Afghan Police, to enable, if you like, more appro­pri­ate secu­ri­ty mech­a­nisms. When the Afghan Police are run­ning affairs you know that you’ve got a good lev­el of secu­ri­ty control. 

So my mea­sure of the progress we’re mak­ing in Uruz­gan Province is not the num­ber of insur­gents that we’ve killed, or cap­ture, or removed from the bat­tle­ground, it’s the way in which we have very sub­stan­tial­ly extend­ed our patrol bases and very sub­stan­tial­ly allowed the local Uruz­gan peo­ple to now con­duct them­selves gen­er­al­ly in a nor­mal way in areas that 12 months or two years ago we would have believed that that was impossible.

LYNDAL CURTIS: So it’s not only the gain­ing ground, but the hold­ing it and the trans­fer­ring of pow­er, that’s the-


LYNDAL CURTIS: ‑mea­sure of success.

STEPHEN SMITH: ‑it’s wrest­ing the ground from the Tal­iban. It’s hold­ing that ground. It’s trans­fer­ring respon­si­bil­i­ty to Afghan secu­ri­ty forces, both Afghan Nation­al Army and police. Hav­ing the con­fi­dence to know that when that trans­fer has occurred, that the ordi­nary peo­ple of Uruz­gan can go about their dai­ly lives with­out the ever present fear of attack by the Taliban.

Now again under­lin­ing the point that we have made it clear that the gains in the ground that we have made up is ten­u­ous. There will be a fight back. We do need to con­sol­i­date and, in addi­tion to Tal­iban efforts to recov­er that ground, there will also be the high pro­file sui­cide bomb­ing and pro­pa­gan­da-type attacks which we have seen a num­ber of in recent times.

LYNDAL CURTIS: Now there are a few things hap­pen­ing in oth­er areas of your port­fo­lio. Late­line report­ed that there have been ques­tions raised about secu­ri­ty checks on civil­ian and mil­i­tary per­son­nel work­ing in mil­i­tary bases, alleg­ing they had been fab­ri­cat­ed. There’s been an inquiry launched into that. Do you have any update?

STEPHEN SMITH: Yes, I’ve just in the last 24 hours or so received a pre­lim­i­nary report from not just the Sec­re­tary of my Depart­ment, by the Inspec­tor Gen­er­al of Defence and a num­ber of points it’s impor­tant to make. First­ly, as soon as these alle­ga­tions were raised on Late­line we took them very seri­ous­ly. I imme­di­ate­ly asked the Sec­re­tary of the Depart­ment to insti­tute an inves­ti­ga­tion led by the Inspec­tor Gen­er­al of Defence.

The pre­lim­i­nary advice is essen­tial­ly that we’re deal­ing here with secu­ri­ty clear­ances for Defence per­son­nel only. This was done by the Defence Secu­ri­ty Author­i­ty before we moved to a more gen­er­al Aus­tralian Gov­ern­ment vet­ting agency. So we’re deal­ing with secu­ri­ty clear­ances for defence per­son­nel firstly.

Sec­ond­ly, we’re deal­ing here with the very first instance of crunch­ing data into com­put­ers, so the whistle­blow­ers or the per­sons con­cerned were data entry peo­ple. There are a range of lay­ers of scruti­ny and check­ing that these mate­ri­als — this mat­ter had to go through before a secu­ri­ty clear­ance could be grant­ed. So it was the start of the process, not the end of the process. Impor­tant­ly what our inves­ti­ga­tion has uncov­ered is that whilst we don’t believe there’s been a whole­sale secu­ri­ty breech, we do want to essen­tial­ly run down every secu­ri­ty clear­ance that was giv­en over this peri­od of time and that will be affected. 

It’s also — we’ve also — it’s also been drawn to atten­tion that the whistle­blow­ers con­cerned have pre­vi­ous­ly raised issues about work­place arrange­ments, harass­ment and the like, and that was inves­ti­gat­ed ear­li­er. It’s now clear that some of the sug­ges­tions made on Late­line were made in gen­er­al terms ear­li­er. They weren’t picked up by the Defence Secu­ri­ty Author­i­ty. They should have been picked up by the Defence Secu­ri­ty Author­i­ty and so there’s been an over­sight in that respect as well, which is regrettable.

What I’m cur­rent­ly doing is giv­ing con­sid­er­a­tion to whether the Inspec­tor Gen­er­al of Defence might need some fur­ther assis­tance as he effects a more com­plete inquiry into each of the indi­vid­ual secu­ri­ty clear­ances and the pos­si­bil­i­ty include either the cur­rent Inspec­tor Gen­er­al of Secu­ri­ty, or one of her pre­de­ces­sors, but I’m giv­ing some con­sid­er­a­tion to that now.

LYNDAL CURTIS: Stephen Smith, thank you very much for your time.

STEPHEN SMITH: Thank you. Thanks very much. 

Press release
Min­is­te­r­i­al Sup­port and Pub­lic Affairs,
Depart­ment of Defence,
Can­ber­ra, Australia 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →