Asia-Pacific Shift Will Improve Relations, Commander Says

WASHINGTON, Feb. 28, 2012 — The Defense Department’s new strate­gic shift toward the Asia-Pacif­ic region will solid­i­fy long­stand­ing part­ner­ships, build on new­er ones, and allow the mil­i­tary to address secu­ri­ty chal­lenges in the area, the com­man­der of U. S. Pacif­ic Com­mand said today.

Navy Adm. Robert F. Willard out­lined the command’s bud­get pri­or­i­ties to the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee. Willard not­ed it was his last planned tes­ti­mo­ny before the com­mit­tee before his impend­ing retire­ment.

The Pacom region cov­ers half the globe, includ­ing 36 nations, and con­tains most of the world’s great nation­al pow­ers, Willard not­ed. The U.S. mil­i­tary has five strong part­ners in the area – Aus­tralia, Japan, South Korea, the Philip­pines and Thai­land – and is advanc­ing impor­tant rela­tions in India and through­out South­east Asia, he said.

As evi­denced by Pacom’s March 2011 response to the earth­quake, tsuna­mi and nuclear melt­down in Japan, Willard said, the command’s close coop­er­a­tion with its part­ners, as well as its inter­op­er­a­ble mil­i­tary sys­tems, make it a quick and sol­id reac­tion force in the most dif­fi­cult sit­u­a­tions.

North Korea con­tin­ues to threat­en sta­bil­i­ty in the Asia-Pacif­ic region, and there is no indi­ca­tion that its new leader, Kim Jong Un, will break from the total­i­tar­i­an lead­er­ship of his deceased father, Kim Jong Il, Willard said. “He is a Kim,” sur­round­ed by the guid­ance of old­er rel­a­tives, he added.

Mean­while, Chi­na “con­tin­ues to be a chal­lenge at many lev­els,” the admi­ral said. Mil­i­tary-to-mil­i­tary rela­tions “are not what they should be” with Chi­na, although they are pro­gress­ing, he said. China’s army “is advanc­ing capa­bil­i­ties at an impres­sive rate,” he said, and con­tin­ues to chal­lenge oth­er Pacif­ic nations in the sea, air and space.

“It’s growth unabat­ed,” he said. “They con­tin­ue to grow capa­bil­i­ties in vir­tu­al­ly all areas.”

There has been increas­ing demand from Asia-Pacif­ic nations for the U.S. mil­i­tary to repo­si­tion itself there after pulling away dur­ing 10 years of war in Iraq and Afghanistan, Willard said. While U.S. air and sea pow­er stayed rel­a­tive­ly sta­ble, he said, ground forces were reduced by 10 per­cent.

“The amount of encour­age­ment that has come from vir­tu­al­ly all actors in the region for U.S. stay­ing pow­er and increased engage­ment in the region was the per­cep­tion in the past decade that our pres­ence was dimin­ished,” he said. “That refrain has not stopped.”

Asia-Pacif­ic nations broad­ly rec­og­nize that the U.S. mil­i­tary will down­size after 10 years of war, as it his­tor­i­cal­ly has done, and that the country’s debt and deficit prob­lems will affect the amount of resources it can devote to the region, the admi­ral said.

Willard also said he is not con­cerned about a draw­down of air­craft and oth­er assets, because the rec­om­men­da­tions were built on sound mil­i­tary strat­e­gy. That said, he added, mil­i­tary lead­ers must keep a watch­ful eye that the repo­si­tion­ing remains in keep­ing with oper­a­tional needs.

One of many needs of the U.S. mil­i­tary in the Pacif­ic region is mar­itime secu­ri­ty and access, Willard said. About $5.3 tril­lion in com­merce flows through the South Chi­na Sea — much of it belong­ing to the Unit­ed States – and at least six Asian nations strug­gle to con­trol it, said he not­ed.

“What makes Chi­na unique is that they’ve laid claim to vir­tu­al­ly all of” the mar­itime routes around Asia, and con­tin­ue to chal­lenge mil­i­tary and com­mer­cial ships, Willard added.

Still, he added, even as pow­er strug­gles ensue, par­tic­u­lar­ly in South­east Asia, “from a region­al, eco­nom­ic stand­point, China’s rise has ben­e­fit­ted us all.” Chi­na is the No. 1 trad­ing part of most of the Pacif­ic nations, he said.

An increas­ing U.S. pres­ence in the Asia-Pacif­ic region is not just about the econ­o­my, but also about the growth of democ­ra­cies there, the admi­ral said. “There are a lot of U.S. val­ues that are high­ly regard­ed in the region, and our form of gov­er­nance is one of them,” he said.

The admi­ral said he is aware of a pro­pos­al to put one of three pre-posi­tioned Marine Corps squadrons in the Pacif­ic on decreased readi­ness sta­tus, but said they will not be on Guam or Diego Gar­cia. The 2012 Nation­al Defense Autho­riza­tion Act requires the Marine Corps com­man­dant and sec­re­tary of defense to cer­ti­fy that the change will not affect readi­ness.

He also said the Unit­ed States is at a dis­ad­van­tage by not sign­ing on to the Con­ven­tion on the Law of the Sea Treaty. Willard not­ed that the Unit­ed States has adhered to the legal frame­work of the treaty since 1994, and believes that ele­ments of the con­ven­tion, name­ly com­mer­cial pro­vi­sions, that caused it to be set aside in the 1980s “have all been cor­rect­ed.”

“This is so impor­tant,” he said. “We believe strong­ly that the Unit­ed States must have a voice in this and a seat at the table,” not­ing that Chi­na is involved in the process.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →