Afghanistan / Pakistan

Afghanistan Suc­cess Depends on Pak­istan, Gates Says

WASHINGTON, May 14, 2009 — With­out suc­cess on the Pak­istan side of the bor­der, efforts to rid both it and Afghanistan of the Tal­iban will be sig­nif­i­cant­ly hard­er, Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates told the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee today while tes­ti­fy­ing on the fis­cal 2010 defense bud­get request.
That suc­cess will be more dif­fi­cult if the Pak­istani gov­ern­ment refus­es to take the fight to the mil­i­tants with­in its country’s bor­ders, Gates said. But tra­di­tion­al thought may prove hard to overcome. 

For all of Pakistan’s his­to­ry, India has been the exis­ten­tial threat,” he said. “I think actu­al­ly it was only with the Taliban’s going too far and mov­ing their oper­a­tions into Buner, just 60 miles or so from Islam­abad, that for the first time they real­ly got the atten­tion of the Pak­istani government.” 

Recent actions of the Pak­istani gov­ern­ment and its army have indi­cat­ed the gov­ern­ment now under­stands the nature of the threat to it and is pre­pared to take action to deal with the threat, Gates said. 

Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, also spoke before the com­mit­tee. He acknowl­edged increas­ing sup­port from the Pak­istani peo­ple to deter the mil­i­tants’ threat to their coun­try and the government’s stepped-up coun­terin­sur­gency oper­a­tions, but he expressed reser­va­tions about sustainability. 

My biggest ques­tion about these oper­a­tions is [the government’s] abil­i­ty to sus­tain them over time,” he said. “Right now I’m encour­aged by what’s hap­pened, but I cer­tain­ly with­hold any judg­ment about where it goes, because of the lack … of his­toric sustainment.” 

In addi­tion to the coun­terin­sur­gency effort on both sides of the Afghanistan-Pak­istan bor­der, Gates said, suc­cess in Afghanistan also relies on turn­ing the country’s agri­cul­ture away from the pop­py crop that sup­plies drug traf­fick­ers and finances crim­i­nal and ter­ror­ist activities. 

Before 30 years of war, Afghanistan … had a strong agri­cul­tur­al sec­tor, and in fact export­ed … a vari­ety of food,” he said. “So the notion of get­ting them to adopt alter­na­tive crops is not fan­ci­ful, but we have to fig­ure out a strat­e­gy where they get the mon­ey and the seeds and the abil­i­ty to sus­tain their fam­i­lies before they get rid of their pop­py crop.” 

The sec­re­tary acknowl­edged Afghan Pres­i­dent Hamid Karzai’s con­cerns about pre­ci­sion coali­tion airstrikes and their effect on Afghan civil­ians, but added that the use of air­pow­er can’t be elim­i­nat­ed. For­go­ing that capa­bil­i­ty, he said, would be like try­ing to fight the war “with one hand tied behind our back.” 

That said,” he con­tin­ued, “one of the charges, I think, for the new com­man­ders, will be to look at how we can do this in a way that fur­ther lim­its inno­cent civil­ian casu­al­ties in Afghanistan, but also gets the truth out to the Afghan peo­ple about what’s real­ly going on.” 

By Saman­tha L. Quigley
Amer­i­can Forces Press Service 

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →