The Syrian Crisis: Russian Policy Risks Wider Conflict

Syn­op­sis
Russ­ian sup­port of Syr­i­an pres­i­dent Bashar al-Assad’s crack­down on anti-gov­ern­ment insur­gents bodes ill for Moscow’s abil­i­ty to pre­vent chaos and anar­chy in Syr­ia and risks wider con­flict in the Fer­tile Cres­cent and beyond.

Com­men­tary

Russ­ian pol­i­cy towards the Syr­i­an cri­sis is seen inter­na­tion­al­ly as sup­port­ing pres­i­dent Bashar al Assad’s bru­tal crack­down on anti-gov­ern­ment insur­gents and oppo­si­tion pro­tes­tors. In Syr­ia, where intense fight­ing has spread from Dam­as­cus to Alep­po, many believe the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty has aban­doned them and left to fend for them­selves against the supe­ri­or fire­pow­er of the Syr­i­an mil­i­tary.

Russia’s pro-Assad pol­i­cy bodes ill for Moscow’s abil­i­ty to con­tribute to pre­vent­ing a descent into chaos and anar­chy by a post-Assad Syr­ia. It also holds out lit­tle promise for Russia’s abil­i­ty to help pre­vent the Syr­i­an cri­sis from spilling across bor­ders into Lebanon, Iraq, Jor­dan and Turkey. The risk for Rus­sia is that its pro-Assad pol­i­cy will pro­duce the very sit­u­a­tion it is seek­ing to avoid: increased volatil­i­ty and con­flict across the Fer­tile Cres­cent that could rein­force already restive pop­u­la­tion groups and Islam­ic mil­i­tants in its own Mus­lim republics. It also risks trou­bling its rela­tions with post-revolt states in the Mid­dle East and North Africa where pub­lic opin­ion has lit­tle sym­pa­thy for the Assad regime and its per­ceived back­ers.

Russia’s Islamist mil­i­tants

Recent attacks on two promi­nent Mus­lim cler­ics in the Russ­ian autonomous oil-rich repub­lic of Tar­tarstan on the Vol­ga Riv­er, may help explain Russ­ian sup­port for the Assad regime. With­in min­utes of each oth­er in July, Tartarstan’s deputy mufti was assas­si­nat­ed and the mufti wound­ed in two sep­a­rate but care­ful­ly timed attacks.

The two men, Valilul­la Yakupov and Idius Faizov, were known for their crit­i­cism of mil­i­tant Islam, and their sup­port for Russ­ian fed­er­al gov­ern­ment efforts to iso­late the mil­i­tants and their com­mer­cial inter­est in the lucra­tive busi­ness of pil­grim­ages to the holy city of Mec­ca. To counter the mil­i­tants, who are spread­ing out from their base in Chech­nya and the Cau­ca­sus, the two muftis had fired extrem­ist cler­ics and banned the use of reli­gious text­books from ultra-con­ser­v­a­tive Sau­di Ara­bia.

The influx of rad­i­cal cler­ics was in response to a call by Chechen sep­a­ratist leader Doku Umarov, the self-described emir of an Islam­ic emi­rate in the Cau­ca­sus, for mil­i­tants to extend their area of oper­a­tions from the Cau­ca­sus to lands that once were part of the Gold­en Horde, a medieval Mus­lim state ruled by a Tar­tar-Mon­gol dynasty. Tar­tarstan, with its oil wealth and 4 mil­lion res­i­dents of which half are Mus­lim, is for Umarov, a log­i­cal tar­get. He has claimed respon­si­bil­i­ty for last year’s attack on a Moscow air­port and a 2010 bomb­ing in the city’s metro sys­tem that togeth­er killed 75 peo­ple.

A small price to pay

Umarov’s ide­o­log­i­cal and geo­graph­i­cal ambi­tions go a long way in explain­ing Russia’s oth­er­wise incom­pre­hen­si­ble sup­port for a bru­tal regime in Syr­ia that has proved inca­pable of defeat­ing an increas­ing­ly well-armed and effec­tive insur­gency. Russ­ian sup­port has earned it the scorn of the West and the Arab world and bodes ill for the future of Russ­ian rela­tions with a post-Assad Syr­ia and oth­ers in the Arab world. Cham­bers of com­merce in Sau­di Ara­bia have already refused to meet with Russ­ian trade del­e­ga­tions and a Sau­di con­trac­tor has bro­ken its com­mer­cial ties to its Russ­ian coun­ter­parts in protest against Russ­ian pol­i­cy.

That may be a rel­a­tive­ly small price to pay from Russia’s per­spec­tive which views the Mid­dle East much like the Unit­ed States did pri­or to the 9/11 attacks. Like pre‑9/11 Wash­ing­ton, Moscow sees auto­crat­ic regimes in the region as pil­lars of sta­bil­i­ty, in a world that oth­er­wise would pro­duce Islamists, as the only buffer against chaos and anar­chy.

The civ­il war in Syr­ia where Islamists dom­i­nate the insur­gency, the Islamist elec­toral vic­to­ries in Egypt and Tunisia, and the polit­i­cal uncer­tain­ty in Libya and Yemen rein­force a view of the pop­u­lar revolts sweep­ing the region as a devel­op­ment that is too close for com­fort to Russia’s soft under­bel­ly in the Cau­ca­sus. It also strength­ens Russ­ian per­cep­tions of US and Euro­pean sup­port of the revolts as cyn­i­cal hypocrisy that ulti­mate­ly could tar­get auto­crat­ic rule in Rus­sia itself.

Then pres­i­dent George W. Bush, in a rare recog­ni­tion of the pit­falls of decades of US pol­i­cy in the Mid­dle East and North Africa, acknowl­edged with­in weeks of the 9/11 attacks, that sup­port for auto­crat­ic regimes that squashed all expres­sions of dis­sent, had cre­at­ed the feed­ing ground for jihadist groups focused on strik­ing at West­ern tar­gets. It is a les­son that appears to have bypassed Russ­ian deci­sion and pol­i­cy mak­ers as they stub­born­ly sup­port a Syr­i­an regime whose down­fall is no longer a ques­tion of if but when.

Russ­ian sus­pi­cions of West­ern sanc­tions against Syr­ia and non-mil­i­tary sup­port for the rebels may not be total­ly unfound­ed, but Moscow has done lit­tle to give sub­stance to its calls for an end to the fight­ing and a polit­i­cal solu­tion that would incor­po­rate ele­ments of the Assad regime. In fail­ing to do so, it has allowed the sit­u­a­tion in Syr­ia to go beyond the point of no return and risks pay­ing a heavy price in the longer term. As a result, the lessons of 9/11 could yet come to haunt Moscow.

About The Author:
James M. Dorsey is a senior fel­low at the S. Rajarat­nam School of Inter­na­tion­al Stud­ies at Nanyang Tech­no­log­i­cal Uni­ver­si­ty in Sin­ga­pore and the author of the blog, The Tur­bu­lent World of Mid­dle East Soc­cer.

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →