Conflict in Syria: The Regional Fall-out

The inter­na­tion­al community’s inabil­i­ty to end the blood­shed in Syr­ia con­tributes not only to a hard­en­ing of eth­nic and sec­tar­i­an bat­tle lines in that war-torn coun­try, but also to the exac­er­ba­tion of fault lines in Turkey.


The civ­il con­flict in Syr­ia has become a proxy war fought by glob­al and region­al pow­ers. The poten­tial fall­out ranges from the exo­dus of many of its 2.1 mil­lion Chris­tians from what they fear will be a Sun­ni-dom­i­nat­ed post-Assad Syr­ia, to the emer­gence of Kur­dish areas in Syr­ia as a new flash­point in Turkey’s inter­mit­tent war against Kur­dish insur­gents. It also risks a greater assertive­ness of Turkey’s Ale­vis, a Shi­ite sect akin to Syr­i­an Pres­i­dent Bashar al-Assad’s Alaw­ites that account for 20 per cent of its population. 

All out­side actors are being blamed for the cri­sis. Rus­sia, deter­mined to thwart per­ceived Amer­i­can region­al designs and wor­ried that its rest­less Mus­lim pop­u­la­tion may be inspired by the Syr­i­an opposition’s resilience, is seen as the bogey­man for par­a­lyz­ing the Unit­ed Nations with its vetoes, with Chi­na, of Secu­ri­ty Coun­cil res­o­lu­tions that would sanc­tion the Assad regime. Iran, Assad’s biggest Mus­lim ally, is seen being com­plic­it in this. 

While the Unit­ed States, the EU, Turkey, Sau­di Ara­bia and Qatar claim the moral high ground by back­ing Syr­i­an rebels against Assad’s bru­tal crack­down, they may well be ulti­mate­ly seen as also hav­ing sharp­ened fault lines across a region try­ing to cope with his downfall. 

While there are ele­ments of cor­rect­ness in the posi­tions of the var­i­ous for­eign pow­ers push­ing their own agen­da in Syr­ia, for Iran the fall of Assad is a zero-sum game. Regime change in Syr­ia would deprive it of its fore­most Arab ally and com­pli­cate its sup­port for Shi­ite Mus­lim Lebanese mili­tia Hezbol­lah. Albeit late in the game, Iran last week sought to mod­i­fy per­cep­tions of its uncon­di­tion­al sup­port for the Assad regime by con­ven­ing a con­fer­ence attend­ed by 30 coun­tries that in a state­ment called for a three-month cease­fire and “polit­i­cal solu­tions based on a nation­al dialogue.” 

Like Iran, the oth­er play­ers have to vary­ing degrees set them­selves up for blame by sup­port­ing one of the pro­tag­o­nists with no cred­i­ble vision of build­ing a unit­ed Syr­ia that is more inclu­sive, demo­c­ra­t­ic and less cor­rupt. In doing so, they risk con­tribut­ing to a post-Assad Syr­ia that could be wracked by eth­nic and sec­tar­i­an ani­mosi­ties with dead­ly revenge and retal­i­a­tion campaigns. 

Rus­sia and Chi­na have effec­tive­ly under­mined their cred­i­bil­i­ty by fail­ing to match their sup­port for Assad with cred­i­ble efforts to medi­ate a solu­tion as they had tried in vain to do in Libya. Both Rus­sia and Chi­na nev­er­the­less attend­ed the con­fer­ence in Tehran and endorsed its final statement. 

Sau­di Ara­bia employs its sup­port of the rebels to fur­ther its Wah­habi rejec­tion of Shi­ites, Alaw­ites and Ale­vis as heretics and sup­port­ers of its Mus­lim neme­sis, Iran, by alleged­ly back­ing attacks on Shi­ite shrines in Syr­ia. Qatar rep­re­sents a less harsh inter­pre­ta­tion of Wah­habism but is no less sup­port­ive of oppo­si­tion forces that, if in pow­er, are like­ly to be no less bent on cre­at­ing a Sun­ni Mus­lim rather than a plu­ral­is­tic, mul­ti-eth­nic, mul­ti-reli­gious Syria. 

Push­ing a Sun­ni Mus­lim agen­da

Turkey, backed by the US, has posi­tioned itself as the par­ti­san cham­pi­on of the Syr­i­an Nation­al Coun­cil (SNC) that is dom­i­nat­ed by the Mus­lim Broth­er­hood and con­sists pri­mar­i­ly of exiles with dimin­ish­ing pop­u­lar­i­ty among a pop­u­la­tion that is bear­ing the brunt of bat­tles rag­ing in pop­u­lat­ed cities, towns and vil­lages. Cir­cum­stan­tial evi­dence sug­gests that the Free Syr­i­an Army (FSA) — flush with Gulf-fund­ed arms, strength­ened by US intel­li­gence and com­mu­ni­ca­tions sup­port, and enabled with access to bases in south­east­ern Turkey – oper­ates pri­mar­i­ly as a Sun­ni Mus­lim militia. 

In short, the lines for bat­tles are being drawn not only in post-Assad Syr­ia but also in the war-rav­aged country’s neigh­bours. Increas­ing­ly Syr­i­an Chris­tians, some of whom sup­port­ed the oppo­si­tion in the ear­ly days of the anti-gov­ern­ment protests, feel that they are being tar­get­ed for their per­ceived sup­port of Assad as the con­flict becomes increas­ing­ly sec­tar­i­an, and they wor­ry whether there would be a place for them in a post-Assad Syria. 

The mem­o­ry of the fate of the Assyr­i­ans in south­east­ern Turkey who were forced to migrate to Europe in the late 1970s as a result of the government’s eco­nom­ic neg­li­gence and Kur­dish attacks, is rein­forced by attacks on Chris­tians in rebel-held areas of north­ern Syr­ia. Chris­t­ian refugees from those areas, many with fam­i­ly ties across the Turk­ish bor­der, have all but giv­en up hope of return­ing to their homes. 

Between a rock and a hard place

Per­cep­tions of the Turk­ish gov­ern­ment favour­ing the Sun­nis is fuelling a sense of depri­va­tion and dis­crim­i­na­tion among Turk­ish Ale­vis who account for 50 per­cent of the bor­der province of Hatay which was Syr­i­an until 1938, when the French trans­ferred it to Turk­ish sov­er­eign­ty. Like the Chris­tians they have cross bor­der fam­i­ly ties and for the longest peri­od of time saw the Assads as guar­an­tors of their community’s rights. 

The esca­lat­ing fight­ing in Syr­ia puts Chris­tians, Ale­vis and Alaw­ites on both sides of the bor­der between a rock and a hard place: they can choose between a dis­cred­it­ed, cor­rupt pari­ah regime that has lost its abil­i­ty to pro­tect their rights and guar­an­tee a sem­blance of plu­ral­ism, and a post-Assad regime that threat­ens to make Syr­ia, with Turk­ish back­ing, a place in which they no longer are welcome. 

Their con­cern is height­ened by the impact of Sau­di finan­cial and cler­i­cal sup­port for the rebels, whose anti-Assad cam­paign is increas­ing­ly being cloaked in reli­gious terms. Salafis as well as home­grown jihadists and a rel­a­tive­ly small num­ber of for­eign­ers, have joined the ranks of the rebels, albeit con­sti­tut­ing a minor­i­ty. Nonethe­less, rebel fight­ers are report­ed to have attempt­ed on sev­er­al occa­sions to destroy the shrine of Sayyi­da Zeinab, the grand­daugh­ter of the Prophet who is revered by Shiites. 

Rus­sia may top the list of nations Syr­i­ans will revile for either back­ing a regime that turned on its peo­ple but that will not allow the pup­pet mas­ters in oth­er world cap­i­tals to go scot-free. Many Sun­nis and sec­u­lar Syr­i­ans in a coun­try where minori­ties account for almost half of the pop­u­la­tion, as well as minori­ties in Turkey, heap equal blame on the Unit­ed States and its allies – Europe, Turkey and the Gulf states – for either fail­ing to inter­vene to stop the slaugh­ter or fuelling eth­nic and reli­gious con­flict. The out­come is one that is like­ly to pow­er not only anti-Russ­ian-Chi­nese and anti-Iran­ian sen­ti­ment but also anti-Amer­i­can­ism, and plant the seeds for con­flicts that are equal­ly detri­men­tal to Amer­i­can interests. 

About The Author:
James M. Dorsey is a senior fel­low at the S. Rajarat­nam School of Inter­na­tion­al Stud­ies at Nanyang Tech­no­log­i­cal Uni­ver­si­ty in Sin­ga­pore and the author of the blog, The Tur­bu­lent World of Mid­dle East Soc­cer.

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →