USA/Afghanistan/Pakistan/Yemen

Com­man­ders Tout Val­ue of Train­ing Indige­nous Forces

By Lisa Daniel
Amer­i­can Forces Press Ser­vice

WASHINGTON, March 17, 2010 — The military’s increas­ing prac­tice of train­ing and equip­ping indige­nous forces to counter ter­ror­ism in their home coun­tries is a high­ly deci­sive, com­par­a­tive­ly low-cost approach to fight­ing glob­al ter­ror­ism, the com­man­ders of U.S. Cen­tral Com­mand and U.S. Spe­cial Oper­a­tions Com­mand said here today.
In their sec­ond day of tes­ti­fy­ing on Capi­tol Hill, Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, head of Cen­tral Com­mand, and Navy Adm. Eric T. Olson, head of Spe­cial Oper­a­tions Com­mand, told the House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee that the train­ing and equip­ping of mil­i­taries in Afghanistan, Pak­istan, Yemen and else­where is mon­ey well spent.

“It’s a heck of a lot cheap­er,” Petraeus told com­mit­tee mem­bers, to fund and train Afghan forces in coun­tert­er­ror­ism than it is to keep even a small con­tin­gent of U.S. forces there indef­i­nite­ly.

“I think the les­son in the fight against extrem­ism is that you have to put pres­sure on the transna­tion­al extrem­ists wher­ev­er they are,” the gen­er­al said. “You can’t do ‘whack-a-mole.’ If all you do is pre­vent Afghanistan from being the sanc­tu­ary that it was, then yes, we have to suc­ceed in that and also have our Pak­istan part­ners be the ones doing the fight­ing on the ground [in Pak­istan].”

Mean­while, Olson said, U.S. spe­cial oper­a­tions forces “are engaged in low-lev­el train­ing in coun­tries across the region in which our adver­saries may move when they ulti­mate­ly are forced out of Afghanistan.”

The Defense Department’s fis­cal 2011 bud­get request would increase fund­ing for spe­cial oper­a­tions forces by 4.6 per­cent, allow­ing for the command’s con­tin­ued train­ing and equip­ping of for­eign mil­i­taries while increas­ing troop strength and procur­ing new equip­ment, Olson said.

Olson out­lined the way ahead for spe­cial oper­a­tions, ask­ing that Con­gress ful­ly fund his base­line request of $6.3 bil­lion and an addi­tion­al $3.5 bil­lion for over­seas con­tin­gency oper­a­tions. Spe­cial Oper­a­tions Com­mand, he said, syn­chro­nizes glob­al oper­a­tions against ter­ror­ist net­works, sup­ports plans for­mu­lat­ed by region­al com­man­ders and makes rec­om­men­da­tions to Pen­ta­gon lead­er­ship on fund­ing allo­ca­tions.

Of the command’s 12,000 forces, rough­ly 10,000 are deployed in the Cen­tral Com­mand area, which cov­ers Iraq, Afghanistan and the broad­er Mid­dle East, Olson said.

If approved, the new bud­get would fund an addi­tion­al 2,700 spe­cial oper­a­tions forces, an increase of 4.6 per­cent, the admi­ral said. He not­ed that annu­al growth has aver­aged around 3 per­cent, “a strat­e­gy intend­ed to retain the best while adding addi­tion­al man­pow­er only as it can be recruit­ed, trained, absorbed, and deployed.”

Olson not­ed the increas­ing­ly spe­cial­ized exper­tise of spe­cial oper­a­tions forces. “Cen­tral to our con­tri­bu­tion are our career, mul­ti-dimen­sion­al oper­a­tors; indi­vid­u­als adept in defense, diplo­ma­cy, and devel­op­ment,” he said, not­ing that they often are local­ly ground­ed in their areas of respon­si­bil­i­ty, are diplo­mat­i­cal­ly astute, and are experts in spe­cial­ized tac­ti­cal skills. “It is demand­ing work,” the admi­ral told the com­mit­tee.

But the num­ber of peo­ple who are both eager and qual­i­fied to serve as oper­a­tors is lim­it­ed, he added, and the com­mand depends on the ser­vices to main­tain recruit­ment and reten­tion.

Spe­cial oper­a­tions forces use both direct and indi­rect approach­es to counter ter­ror­ism around the world, Olson explained. In the direct approach, forces cap­ture, kill and inter­dict extrem­ist net­works and resources. “The direct approach is urgent, nec­es­sary and large­ly kinet­ic,” he said. “These effects, while sig­nif­i­cant in the short term, are not by them­selves deci­sive.”

In the indi­rect approach, an autho­riza­tion the com­mand has had since 2005, spe­cial oper­a­tions forces train and equip indige­nous forces to take over the fight, Olson said. The author­i­ty is a “key tool for our wide­ly dis­persed and often-iso­lat­ed spe­cial oper­a­tions forces around the world,” he said.

The spend­ing author­i­ty has result­ed in many suc­cess­ful coun­tert­er­ror­ist oper­a­tions by allow­ing for “essen­tial access” to loca­tions, peo­ple and infor­ma­tion, the admi­ral said.

“The endur­ing results come from indi­rect approach­es – those in which we enable part­ners to com­bat extrem­ist orga­ni­za­tions them­selves by con­tribut­ing to their capa­bil­i­ties,” he said.

Direct and indi­rect approach­es must be care­ful­ly bal­anced, Olson said. “While the direct approach is often nec­es­sary and has imme­di­ate impact, it essen­tial­ly cre­ates time for the indi­rect approach to achieve last­ing out­comes through oth­er means.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →