USA — Partners Build High-tech Hands for Wounded Warriors

WASHINGTON — Top sci­en­tists and tech­nol­o­gists are work­ing with the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency to give arms and hands back to war­riors who lose them in bat­tle.

Users wear and control, without surgery, an advanced prosthetic arm developed under the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency's Revolutionizing Prosthetics program in 2007. Courtesy photo
Users wear and con­trol, with­out surgery, an advanced pros­thet­ic arm devel­oped under the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency’s Rev­o­lu­tion­iz­ing Pros­thet­ics pro­gram in 2007.
Cour­tesy pho­to
Click to enlarge

Army Col. (Dr.) Geof­frey Ling, the DARPA pro­gram man­ag­er, talked about the pro­gram Nov. 19 to a TEDx Pen­ta­gon audi­ence. TEDx Pen­ta­gon is a mil­i­tary-focused speak­er series. “When you lose the arm any­where along its course, you also lose the hand,” Ling said. And this hand is tru­ly remark­able — it is the most com­plex bio­log­i­cal tool that exists in nature today.” 

Even at the finest hos­pi­tals in Amer­i­ca today, the solu­tion to a miss­ing hand usu­al­ly is a hook, Ling said, “because mak­ing a hand is thought to be impos­si­ble.” “But is it?” he asked. Not if you work at DARPA, he said. 

Ling said that dur­ing his first deploy­ment to Afghanistan in 2003, he was frus­trat­ed by being able to help patients sur­vive, but not to com­plete­ly restore them to health, espe­cial­ly if they had lost limbs, eye­sight or brain function. 

When Ling returned from Afghanistan, he was invit­ed to join DARPA. “And let me tell you, it is a mag­i­cal place,” he said. “The lead­ers there are vision­ar­ies. They exhort us dai­ly to chal­lenge what is com­mon­ly held to be impos­si­ble and instead look at it as pos­si­ble — and if so, make it probable.” 

DARPA offi­cials put out a chal­lenge, he said: Make us a hand that looks like a hand, works like a hand and has the per­for­mance char­ac­ter­is­tics of a hand, and that lets the wear­er con­trol it nat­u­ral­ly, with the brain. 

“Most of the engi­neers thought we were crazy,” he said. “That’s good; it means we’re on the right track. But a num­ber of them were crazy enough to come work with us.” The chal­lenge includ­ed an ambi­tious timetable. 

“We have the most wor­thy patients wait­ing for it,” Ling said he told the sci­en­tists, “so you don’t have five or 10 or 20 years. You’ve got two years … to go from idea to mak­ing the thing work.” 

DARPA decid­ed to divide the pro­gram into two parts. One group would build the finest mechan­i­cal arm they could. The sec­ond would build an arm-hand com­bi­na­tion con­trolled by the brain. 

“To get that inter­face, from brain con­trol to body to arm, that’s a lit­tle tough,” Ling said he told the sec­ond group. “So we’ll give you four years.” 

Today, the agency’s Rev­o­lu­tion­iz­ing Pros­thet­ics pro­gram is enter­ing its fifth year, and near­ly $150 mil­lion is com­mit­ted to improv­ing the entire upper-limb pros­thet­ic sys­tem, includ­ing sock­ets and con­trol software. 

By 2008, DEKA Inte­grat­ed Solu­tions Corp. had built two gen­er­a­tions of a “strap-and-go” arm-hand sys­tem that users could wear and con­trol with­out surgery. Six users helped them assess the pro­to­types in clin­i­cal stud­ies, and clin­i­cal and take-home tri­al sub­jects logged more than 3,000 hours of use on the sec­ond-gen­er­a­tion DEKA arm. Tri­als includ­ed 26 par­tic­i­pants in a Vet­er­ans Affairs Depart­ment study that used the DEKA arm in three VA med­ical cen­ters and the Cen­ter for the Intre­pid at Brooke Army Med­ical Cen­ter in Fort Sam Hous­ton, Texas. 

DEKA plans to fin­ish build­ing its first third-gen­er­a­tion sys­tem ear­ly next year for more VA and Defense Depart­ment tri­als. The arm has 10 pow­ered degrees of motion and six user-selec­table hand grips. 

It looks like an arm and works like an arm, Ling said, but oper­ates using “local control.” 

“As you turn, it turns; you lean for­ward, it comes out; you stand up, it goes back in the same way your arm does,” Ling explained. “It has a local mechan­i­cal con­trol, so when you grab a cup, for exam­ple, your hand con­forms around it. … It’s ful­ly mod­u­lar — you lose a hand, we’ll give you a hand. You lose your arm below the elbow, we’ll give you a hand and a fore­arm, … all the way up to the shoul­der. And it’s avail­able today.” 

DEKA is apply­ing for Food and Drug Admin­is­tra­tion per­mis­sion to mar­ket the arm and is nego­ti­at­ing with com­mer­cial part­ners that even­tu­al­ly will sell the mod­u­lar sys­tems. “It’s a won­der­ful thing — great, great, great,” Ling said. “But not near­ly good enough, because in the end, that is not full restora­tion. To do that, we’ve got to get into the brain.” 

Over the first four years of the sec­ond DARPA effort — to build a hand con­trolled by the brain — sci­en­tists at the Johns Hop­kins Uni­ver­si­ty Applied Physics Lab­o­ra­to­ry went through three mechan­i­cal designs and gained insight from more than 100 hours of use by six tri­al participants. 

The Mod­u­lar Pros­thet­ic Limb had 17 con­trolled degrees of motion at the end of the lab’s Phase 2 con­tract. In June, DARPA award­ed a Phase 3 con­tract so the lab’s sci­en­tists can fin­ish devel­op­ing brain implants that could pro­vide near-nat­ur­al con­trol of the system. 

The pro­gram inspired the Nation­al Insti­tutes of Health to spon­sor a chal­lenge for brain con­trol of the advanced arms. Ling said this part of the pro­gram has gal­va­nized “every lead­ing neu­ro­sci­en­tist in the Unit­ed States, all the big labs, to be involved in the project. With the help of our friends at [the Nation­al Insti­tutes of Health], we have cor­nered the market.” 

Togeth­er, the sci­en­tists have devel­oped “a lit­tle brain inter­face device, … half the size of your pinky nail, that lays on the sur­face of the brain and cap­tures brain sig­nals asso­ci­at­ed with move­ment of your arms as you’re doing a task,” Ling said. 

“We’ve learned how to decode those sig­nals such that it can work an arm,” he added. “We’ve already got pri­mates doing this.” 

Oth­er part­ners include the Nation­al Insti­tute of Stan­dards and Tech­nol­o­gy, which has fol­lowed pro­gram devel­op­ments to inform stan­dards for med­ical robots. Sev­er­al Army rep­re­sen­ta­tives act as advi­sors and the FDA helps DARPA offi­cials nav­i­gate reg­u­la­to­ry requirements. 

The new hand has five inde­pen­dent, mov­ing fin­gers and a rotat­ing thumb. Sen­sors in the fin­gers let wear­ers feel what they touch. Vibra­tion sen­sors in the joints allow them to feel move­ment. Tem­per­a­ture sen­sors allow them to feel hot and cold. 

Now, Ling said, DARPA and the Johns Hop­kins lab are ready to iden­ti­fy patients who will test the new mod­u­lar arms. 

“These are patients who have had spinal-cord injuries, so they are unable to move from the neck down. They have no func­tion of the arms or legs,” he said. “Well, we’re going to give them an arm.” 

DARPA intends to have the Johns Hop­kins lab run two clin­i­cal sites through 2013 to gain data on brain con­trol of the arm pros­the­ses. The clin­i­cal sites are seek­ing reg­u­la­to­ry approval for devices they will implant in patients to decode motor sig­nals that will move the arm and hand. 

“What we’re going to do is … put the chip in and then cou­ple it up to this remark­able arm,” Ling said. “What we expect patients to be able to do is all the activ­i­ties of dai­ly liv­ing, such as eat­ing and the like, but also work a keyboard. 

“If they can play Chopin on the piano, let them play Chopin,” he con­tin­ued. “If they can work needle­point and I give them an iPhone, let them have it. That’s in six months. In 18 months, I’m going to give some­body two arms because, in the end, I want these patients to be able to lift them­selves and roll around in wheelchairs.” 

The goal is to gain FDA approval to mar­ket the mod­u­lar pros­thet­ic limbs and to use implantable arrays in oth­ers who have lost con­trol of their upper limbs, espe­cial­ly amputees and stroke victims. 

“Think about what this tech­nol­o­gy can do for stroke vic­tims, Parkinson’s vic­tims [and] spinal-cord vic­tims, of course,” Ling said. The elder­ly also can ben­e­fit, he said. 

“Why can’t the 90-year-old man go out back and play ten­nis again?” he asked. “Why can’t the 80-year-old woman go to her great-grandson’s wed­ding, not in some stink­ing wheel­chair and a dia­per, but go there to dance with her grandson? 

“These are all with­in the realm of pos­si­bil­i­ty,” he added. “In fact, they’re with­in the realm of probability.” 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →