USA — Navy Intel Chief: Information Dominance Must Balance Firepower

WASHINGTON, Jan. 5, 2011 — “Infor­ma­tion as war­fare” requires oper­a­tional com­man­ders to employ intel­li­gence, sur­veil­lance and recon­nais­sance to dom­i­nate the infor­ma­tion realm even as they direct com­bat actions, the Navy’s senior intel­li­gence offi­cer said today.

Vice Adm. David J. “Jack” Dorsett, the direc­tor of naval intel­li­gence and deputy chief of naval oper­a­tions for infor­ma­tion dom­i­nance, spoke to defense writ­ers about what he called a shift from an Indus­tri­al Age mil­i­tary force to an Infor­ma­tion Age force.

“We’re great at strike war­fare -– drop­ping bombs. It’s now time for the Navy, and frankly the U.S. joint forces, to step up and start deal­ing with infor­ma­tion in a much more sophis­ti­cat­ed man­ner than they have in the past,” Dorsett said.

Adm. Gary Roug­head, chief of naval oper­a­tions, announced in Octo­ber 2009 the Navy was com­bin­ing its intel­li­gence direc­torate, com­mu­ni­ca­tions net­works and relat­ed infor­ma­tion tech­nol­o­gy capa­bil­i­ties into the infor­ma­tion dom­i­nance orga­ni­za­tion.

Dorsett said as leader of that orga­ni­za­tion he serves as the Navy’s “banker” for infor­ma­tion capa­bil­i­ties.

“I do resources, I do require­ments, I do poli­cies,” he said. “Tenth Fleet is the oper­a­tional com­man­der for our cyber forces and our net­work forces, and our Navy’s infor­ma­tion oper­a­tional capa­bil­i­ties.

“Tenth Fleet is a three-star oper­a­tional com­man­der,” he con­tin­ued. “The [chief of naval oper­a­tions] this past year also cre­at­ed Navy Cyber Com­mand, a two-star com­man­der, and he’s respon­si­ble for man­ning, train­ing and equip­ping the fleet.”

In just over a year since the Navy reor­ga­nized its intel­li­gence and tech­nol­o­gy com­mu­ni­ties, Dorsett said, the ser­vice has made great progress in orga­niz­ing its work force and devel­op­ing sen­sors and net­works, but has­n’t accom­plished as much in ana­lyz­ing col­lect­ed intel­li­gence.

“Man­ag­ing data, mak­ing sense of the infor­ma­tion, is one of our largest chal­lenges,” Dorsett said. “Part of the job deal­ing with infor­ma­tion dom­i­nance is look­ing at infor­ma­tion from one end to the oth­er: from sen­sors to net­works to trans­port to exploita­tion dis­sem­i­na­tion.

“One area this past year we haven’t made as much progress on was on pro­cess­ing, exploita­tion and dis­sem­i­na­tion,” he con­tin­ued. “It’s high on our list for this upcom­ing year.” With­in the Defense Depart­ment, the Navy is pri­mar­i­ly part­ner­ing with the Air Force in “tack­ling imagery exploita­tion first, as some­thing … eas­i­er to get our hands around,” Dorsett said.

“But we’re also part­ner­ing with agen­cies like the Nation­al Secu­ri­ty Agency on their cloud com­put­ing ini­tia­tives, their cyber pilot ini­tia­tives, and … how you man­age infor­ma­tion, how do you get it to flow from one point to anoth­er,” he added.

Effec­tive­ly pro­cess­ing intel­li­gence imagery –- man­ag­ing data -– requires com­bin­ing auto­mat­ed tools with skilled human analy­sis, Dorsett said.

“An awful lot can be auto­mat­ed,” he said. “You don’t need to look at every sin­gle piece of elec­tro-opti­cal imagery that comes in, nec­es­sar­i­ly. You need tools to alert you to the key issues that you can then apply an ana­lyst to.”

But if those ana­lysts aren’t well-trained and expe­ri­enced in look­ing at data from sig­nals intel­li­gence to imagery to open-source data, Dorsett said, some of the avail­able infor­ma­tion will be lost.

“We look at things holis­ti­cal­ly,” he said. “If you just look at the data and tech­nol­o­gy and tools and you for­get to apply ener­gy to train­ing your peo­ple, you won’t get to the right solu­tion set.”

A major empha­sis over the past year, he said, has been to increase the num­ber of sen­sors gath­er­ing imagery in the “bat­tle space.”

“But I think more needs to be applied to this issue of pro­cess­ing, exploita­tion and dis­sem­i­na­tion, espe­cial­ly as all of the ser­vices bring more sen­sors to bear in our future capa­bil­i­ties,” Dorsett said. “That’s part of our game plan.”

In replac­ing lega­cy weapons sys­tems with new capa­bil­i­ties, he said, a one-for-one sub­sti­tu­tion isn’t the most effec­tive approach.

The Navy is tak­ing a “fam­i­ly of sys­tems” approach to bal­ance infor­ma­tion and fire­pow­er require­ments, he said, not­ing the approach includes incor­po­rat­ing sig­nals intel­li­gence capa­bil­i­ty on sur­face ships.

“One of the prin­ci­ples for infor­ma­tion dom­i­nance is, every plat­form needs to be a sen­sor and every sen­sor needs to be net­worked,” Dorsett said.

While increas­ing the intel­li­gence-gath­er­ing capa­bil­i­ty of weapons sys­tems is crit­i­cal, he said, the mil­i­tary also needs to main­tain its oth­er com­bat capa­bil­i­ties.

The Navy’s P‑8 Posei­don air­craft is an exam­ple, he said. The air­craft, now in devel­op­ment as an anti-sub­ma­rine and ship­ping inter­dic­tion plat­form, is “a pri­ma­ry warfight­ing tool for the Navy,” Dorsett said.

“We don’t want to opti­mize it for [sig­nals intel­li­gence] at the expense of [asym­met­ric war­fare],” he said. “We’ll deal with spi­ral approach­es to a vari­ety of our sys­tems and plat­forms and plug-and-play in the years ahead, so I would­n’t pre­clude the P‑8 from hav­ing a [sig­nals intel­li­gence] or [mul­ti intel­li­gence] pay­load, but at this point we’re going to focus on pri­mar­i­ly on [asym­met­ric war­fare].”

His­tor­i­cal­ly, the U.S. mil­i­tary has empha­sized com­bat pow­er over intel­li­gence activ­i­ties, Dorsett said.

“I think you see, with the Depart­ment of Defense and the cre­ation of [U.S.] Cyber Com­mand, the recog­ni­tion by the sec­re­tary of defense and the seniors with­in the depart­ment that the non­k­i­net­ic, the cyber, the infor­ma­tion side of the house is real­ly crit­i­cal,” he said. “You need a com­bat­ant com­man­der that is deal­ing in that are­na as his pri­ma­ry mis­sion area.” Com­man­ders in Iraq and Afghanistan have seen the val­ue of inte­grat­ing intel­li­gence, sur­veil­lance and recon­nais­sance capa­bil­i­ties with oper­a­tions over the last five years, he said. “Ops-intel inte­gra­tion was the 2000–2010 era improve­ment we made in joint war-fight­ing,” Dorsett said. “2010–2020, it needs to be this ele­va­tion of non-kinet­ic infor­ma­tion capa­bil­i­ties.”

The Navy has inte­grat­ed intel­li­gence and sur­veil­lance capa­bil­i­ties, elec­tron­ic war­fare, cyber, net­works, oceanog­ra­phy and mete­o­rol­o­gy –- knowl­edge of the envi­ron­ment –- to break down bar­ri­ers in warfight­ing, Dorsett said.

“Out of bal­ance? We have been,” he said. “I think … DOD is tak­ing a vari­ety of steps to make improve­ments in this non-kinet­ic, infor­ma­tion side of the house.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →