USA — Immersive Training Builds Small-Unit Decision-Making Skills

WASHINGTON, Oct. 15, 2010 — Marines at Camp Pendle­ton, Calif., got a glimpse last week into what’s like­ly to be the train­ing envi­ron­ment of the future: one that injects live actors, ani­ma­tron­ics, pro­ject­ed avatars and oth­er sen­so­ry enhance­ments to repli­cate the sights, sounds, smells and stress­es of com­bat — and demands the same razor-sharp deci­sion-mak­ing process­es and respons­es.

Marines prepare to enter a mock Afghan village setup at the Infantry Immersion Trainer at Camp Pendleton, Calif. The exercise was part of a U.S. Joint Forces Command joint capability technology demonstration that closely simulated battlefield conditions.
Marines pre­pare to enter a mock Afghan vil­lage set­up at the Infantry Immer­sion Train­er at Camp Pendle­ton, Calif. The exer­cise was part of a U.S. Joint Forces Com­mand joint capa­bil­i­ty tech­nol­o­gy demon­stra­tion that close­ly sim­u­lat­ed bat­tle­field con­di­tions.
U.S. Army pho­to by Sgt. Josh LeCap­pelain
Click to enlarge

The Marines, many recent­ly returned from com­bat deploy­ments, test­ed out some of the vir­tu­al real­i­ty-based train­ing con­cepts U.S. Joint Forces Com­mand is explor­ing to bet­ter pre­pare ground troops for com­plex oper­at­ing envi­ron­ments, Jay Reist, who’s head­ing up the effort, told reporters yesterday. 

Reist is pro­gram man­ag­er for what Joint Forces Com­mand calls its “future immer­sive train­ing envi­ron­ment joint capa­bil­i­ty tech­nol­o­gy demon­stra­tion.” The two-year project, near­ing its com­ple­tion, is part of a broad Defense Depart­ment-wide cam­paign to make ground-based sim­u­la­tion as real­is­tic as possible. 

The demon­stra­tion com­bines emer­gent tech­nolo­gies in a real­is­tic urban train­ing envi­ron­ment, based on real deploy­ment expe­ri­ences. Its goal, Reist said, is to improve pre-deploy­ment train­ing for the most vul­ner­a­ble warfight­ers: dis­mount­ed troops oper­at­ing at the small-unit level. 

“We’re real­ly focused at the small unit, infantry squad lev­el and pro­vid­ing them capa­bil­i­ties using emerg­ing tech­nol­o­gy to cre­ate a learn­ing expe­ri­ence for them to be bet­ter pre­pared for the com­plex envi­ron­ments that they go into,” he said. 

The project aims to hone their deci­sion-mak­ing process­es so they’re bet­ter poised to react to stress­ful, tac­ti­cal­ly chal­leng­ing sit­u­a­tions, he said. 

Marines test­ed the con­cept over the past few months at Camp Pendleton’s infantry immer­sion train­er, wrap­ping it up dur­ing an inten­sive four-day event last week. 

Con­front­ed with five rig­or­ous sce­nar­ios in a three-dimen­sion­al mock Afghan vil­lage inten­tion­al­ly designed to induce stress and a sense of “being there,” the Marines inter­act­ed with friend­ly, as well as hos­tile, vil­lagers as they con­duct­ed their missions. 

Through­out the sce­nar­ios, they had to make the same some­times split-sec­ond, life-and-death deci­sions required dur­ing deploy­ments: What feels right and what does­n’t? And what’s the best way to respond when things don’t feel right? 

While the Marines nego­ti­at­ed the sce­nar­ios mul­ti­ple times, Reist and his team mon­i­tored their every move­ment through sen­sors attached to their hel­mets, weapons and knees, and video and audio recorders strate­gi­cal­ly placed through­out the venue. The team also mon­i­tored the Marines’ heart rates and oth­er vital signs to assess their stress lev­els dur­ing the exercise. 

“Through the tech­nol­o­gy we have emplaced in that venue, we can track every sin­gle step they took,” Reist said. Inte­grat­ed with real-time audio and cam­era feeds that cap­ture every action tak­en and word spo­ken, “we have ground truth on every­thing that took place with­in that sce­nario, in that venue, and that learn­ing envi­ron­ment,” he said. 

After­ward, the eval­u­a­tors joined unit lead­ers in con­duct­ing debrief­in­gs and exten­sive after-action reviews of what went right, what did­n’t, and what areas need­ed improvement. 

The result, Reist said, was that par­tic­i­pants per­formed bet­ter each time they ran through the sce­nar­ios. To sci­en­tif­i­cal­ly ver­i­fy that, the eval­u­a­tors gave the Marines two sit­u­a­tion­al judg­ment tests devel­oped by Joint Forces Command’s sub­ject-mat­ter and human-per­for­mance experts. One was admin­is­tered before the Marines ran through the sce­nar­ios, and the oth­er after. 

“You can pret­ty much, based on the data we cap­tured, get a good diag­nos­tic of the learn­ing expe­ri­ence that they went through,” Reist said. 

He empha­sized the impor­tance of con­sis­tent­ly thread­ing key themes through­out mis­sion prepa­ra­tion, exe­cu­tion and review. 

“We have set the envi­ron­ment for deci­sion-mak­ing,” he said. “It real­ly sets them up and cre­ates men­tal mod­els so that when they do go into the real thing, they have seen it before and they have been there before.” 

That helps get teams and small-unit lead­ers to the point where “they are real­ly bet­ter at deci­sion-mak­ing and mak­ing sense of the envi­ron­ment,” he said. 

Last week’s exer­cise built on progress made since Marines at Camp Leje­une, N.C., and sol­diers at Fort Ben­ning, Ga., test­ed the first spi­ral of the demon­stra­tion project in March and April. 

That exer­cise empha­sized vir­tu­al train­ing, with real­is­tic dig­i­tal towns and play­ers repli­cat­ing warfight­er expe­ri­ences in both Afghanistan and Iraq. 

The Camp Pendle­ton exer­cise, spi­ral two of the demon­stra­tion project, took that train­ing expe­ri­ence to the next lev­el, Reist explained. With an empha­sis on live train­ing, it merged vir­tu­al and live capa­bil­i­ties to present par­tic­i­pants with both phys­i­cal and men­tal challenges. 

While bet­ter prepar­ing warfight­ers to oper­ate in demand­ing and high­ly stress­ful envi­ron­ments, Reist cit­ed anoth­er, ini­tial­ly unin­tend­ed, ben­e­fit of immer­sive train­ing: pre­vent­ing post-trau­mat­ic stress. 

“The more you can ramp up the inten­si­ty of train­ing pri­or to trau­mat­ic expe­ri­ences in com­bat, the more you are going to mit­i­gate that post trau­mat­ic stress on the oth­er end,” he said. 

Recent­ly returned com­bat troops also appear to ben­e­fit from re-immers­ing them­selves in a high­ly charged envi­ron­ment sim­i­lar to what they left behind, he said. 

“From what I saw, it was healthy for them to get back in,” Reist said, cit­ing research and stud­ies show­ing sim­i­lar find­ings. “I can’t tell you that that’s empir­i­cal­ly true. But anec­do­tal­ly, watch­ing those young men get back into an immer­sive envi­ron­ment, I think it’s a healthy thing to do.” 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →