USA — Deployments Can Impact Students’ Academic Success

WASHINGTON — Par­ents’ deploy­ments affect mil­i­tary chil­dren not only on an emo­tion­al lev­el, but also on an aca­d­e­m­ic lev­el, an Army study has revealed.

The study found that chil­dren whose par­ents have deployed for a cumu­la­tive 19 months or more had low­er school achieve­ment test scores than chil­dren whose par­ents had deployed for a less­er time or not at all. But coop­er­a­tive efforts with schools and an increase in behav­ioral health resources can make inroads into coun­ter­ing this out­come, Amy Richard­son, pol­i­cy researcher for the Rand Corp., said yes­ter­day at the 2010 Asso­ci­a­tion of the U.S. Army Annu­al Meet­ing and Expo­si­tion here. 

Richard­son offered a sneak peek at the find­ings of a two-year study on the effects of deploy­ments on mil­i­tary children’s aca­d­e­m­ic suc­cess and emo­tion­al health dur­ing a stand­ing-room-only fam­i­ly forum, the sec­ond of four to be held dur­ing the annu­al meet­ing. She was one of sev­er­al mil­i­tary and civil­ian experts to speak on the chal­lenges fac­ing mil­i­tary chil­dren and the efforts under way to help them. 

Rand Corp. con­duct­ed the study from 2002 to 2008 on behalf of the Army, she said, and encom­passed a sam­ple of mil­i­tary chil­dren, both active and reserve, attend­ing pub­lic schools in North Car­oli­na and Wash­ing­ton state. 

The impact for chil­dren began at the 19-month mark in par­ents’ total time deployed, Richard­son not­ed, and the cumu­la­tive amount of time turned out to be more sig­nif­i­cant than the num­ber of deployments. 

“What’s remark­able,” she not­ed, “is that this rela­tion­ship is sta­ble across a num­ber of dimensions.” 

Researchers delved into the find­ings to see if they revealed dif­fer­ences among the chil­dren based on num­ber of deploy­ments or state of res­i­dence. They also looked for vari­a­tions based on age, gen­der and rank or sta­tus of the par­ent, but found sim­i­lar results for all, Richard­son said. 

To add anoth­er dimen­sion to the study, researchers inter­viewed behav­ioral health spe­cial­ists, teach­ers, admin­is­tra­tors and coun­selors to gain insight into the unique aca­d­e­m­ic and emo­tion­al chal­lenges mil­i­tary chil­dren, both active and reserve, face when a par­ent is deployed. 

What they found was some­thing peo­ple have been aware of intu­itive­ly for some time, Richard­son said: many mil­i­tary fam­i­lies are cop­ing well with deploy­ments, while oth­ers are struggling. 

But the researchers also dis­cov­ered that schools are thirsty for infor­ma­tion. Admin­is­tra­tors and teach­ers want to know which stu­dents have a mil­i­tary par­ent, their deploy­ment sta­tus and what resources are avail­able to help them so they can bet­ter address stu­dents’ behav­ioral health needs. 

“We also found that chil­dren are fac­ing some behav­ioral health chal­lenges that can impact their aca­d­e­m­ic suc­cess, and for many of the chil­dren [resilience] seemed to be wan­ing,” Richard­son said. 

Also not sur­pris­ing, researchers found that chil­dren who are strug­gling with deploy­ments have par­ents who also are strug­gling, she not­ed, under­scor­ing the impor­tance of parental influence. 

Look­ing to the Guard and Reserve, they found some chil­dren felt iso­lat­ed with­in their schools and lack the type of sup­port active-duty chil­dren draw from one anoth­er dur­ing deploy­ments, Richard­son said. 

The study revealed a num­ber of road­blocks to com­bat­ing these issues, she said. The Army has a short­age of providers with train­ing in youth and ado­les­cent health, a sit­u­a­tion that is mir­rored across the nation. Addi­tion­al­ly, some providers have lit­tle ground­ing in mil­i­tary cul­ture and of the chal­lenges fam­i­lies face, she added, and the avail­abil­i­ty of pre­ven­tion, screen­ing and ear­ly inter­ven­tion ser­vices varies wide­ly across the Army. 

Addi­tion­al­ly, mil­i­tary and fam­i­ly life con­sul­tants — licensed coun­selors who vis­it schools — pro­vide impor­tant sup­port, but mon­i­tor­ing and eval­u­a­tion of this pro­gram could be improved, Richard­son noted. 

Richard­son out­lined a num­ber of rec­om­men­da­tions for the Army, not­ing that progress in many of these areas already has been made since the study began. 

Stu­dents need addi­tion­al sup­port with their home­work and school work, she said, which can be online, in per­son, pro­vid­ed through mil­i­tary-spon­sored or sup­port­ed pro­grams, or even through vol­un­teer services. 

Richard­son also sug­gest­ed Army lead­ers cre­ate a method to inform schools about which chil­dren are mil­i­tary and the sta­tus of parental deploy­ment, which could take the shape of a vol­un­tary form hand­ed out at the start of the year or, ide­al­ly, infor­ma­tion fed direct­ly from the Army to the schools. 

School coun­selors also need bet­ter access to infor­ma­tion on ser­vices that can help Army fam­i­lies. The infor­ma­tion is scat­tered across sev­er­al web­sites, and many are dif­fi­cult for non­mil­i­tary per­son­nel to nav­i­gate, she not­ed. A one-stop resource for teach­ers and coun­selors who are sup­port­ing mil­i­tary chil­dren would be help­ful, Richard­son suggested. 

The Army also should improve the pres­ence of school liai­son offi­cers and encour­age them to fos­ter a more col­lab­o­ra­tive effort with school admin­is­tra­tors. Since this rec­om­men­da­tion was first made, Richard­son said, the Army has increased the num­ber of school liai­son officers. 

To improve the Army’s behav­ioral health care capac­i­ty, Richard­son sug­gest­ed increas­ing sub­spe­cial­ty pay and oth­er sup­port ben­e­fits to draw more spe­cial­ists, as well as fos­ter­ing free, com­mu­ni­ty-based men­tal health care sup­port through grant fund­ing or coop­er­a­tive efforts. 

Telepsy­chi­a­try would offer a valu­able resource to Guard and Reserve mem­bers, she said. The Army already has a pilot pro­gram at Fort Bragg, N.C., and Fort Drum, N.Y., to reach remote pop­u­la­tions, she added. 

On pre­ven­tion, screen­ing and ear­ly inter­ven­tion ser­vices, Richard­son called for the “enhanced inte­gra­tion” of behav­ioral health care into the pri­ma­ry care set­ting by either col­lo­cat­ing both ser­vices or build­ing pri­ma­ry care’s capac­i­ty to address behav­ioral health issues. 

Final­ly, Richard­son rec­om­mend­ed that the Army orga­nize more region­al or statewide social events to min­i­mize the social iso­la­tion Guard and Reserve ser­vice­mem­bers and their fam­i­lies may expe­ri­ence. A social net­work­ing site espe­cial­ly for mil­i­tary youth, with instant mes­sag­ing and chat rooms, would be anoth­er help­ful method, she said. 

Stud­ies such as this one offer valu­able insight into the effects of deploy­ments on mil­i­tary chil­dren, Thomas Lam­ont, assis­tant sec­re­tary of the Army for man­pow­er and reserve affairs, said dur­ing the forum. 

More than 524,000 sol­diers with chil­dren have deployed in sup­port of the war effort, he not­ed. And as of June 30, 142,000 Army chil­dren were deal­ing with the absence of a deployed par­ent. Army lead­ers need to know how these chil­dren are cop­ing, and what they can do to bet­ter pro­vide aca­d­e­m­ic, social and emo­tion­al sup­port so they can thrive, he said. 

The Army will con­tin­ue to seek stud­ies to fol­low chil­dren as they mature to antic­i­pate the long-term effects of deploy­ments and oth­er mil­i­tary stres­sors, Lam­ont said. 

“We need to know not just how chil­dren are doing today, but how they’ll react in years to come,” he said. “We need to under­stand these things.” 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →