U.S. Wants Renewed Military Contacts with China

WASHINGTON, Aug. 17, 2010 — Resump­tion of mil­i­tary-to-mil­i­tary con­tacts between the Unit­ed States and Chi­na is in both coun­tries’ best inter­ests, senior defense offi­cials said yes­ter­day.

The offi­cials, speak­ing on back­ground about a new report deliv­ered to Con­gress yes­ter­day, also said the Chi­nese have not been as trans­par­ent as they could be about their mil­i­tary trans­for­ma­tion pro­gram, leav­ing the Sino‑U.S. dia­logue open to mis­un­der­stand­ing and mis­com­mu­ni­ca­tions that could lead to miscalculations. 

The con­gres­sion­al­ly man­dat­ed annu­al report, titled “Mil­i­tary and Secu­ri­ty Devel­op­ments Involv­ing the People’s Repub­lic of Chi­na 2010,” was released on a day when offi­cials announced Chi­na has sur­passed Japan as the world’s sec­ond-largest econ­o­my. Chi­na should have a gross domes­tic prod­uct of just over $5 tril­lion this year. The Unit­ed States has the world’s largest econ­o­my, with just over $15 trillion. 

The boom­ing Chi­nese econ­o­my is a good thing for the world, the report says, not­ing that the Chi­nese mid­dle class is grow­ing by leaps and bounds. The eco­nom­ic expan­sion has giv­en the Chi­nese gov­ern­ment the mon­ey need­ed to trans­form its military. 

“We wel­come a strong, pros­per­ous and suc­cess­ful Chi­na,” a senior defense offi­cial said, not­ing that a strong Chi­na has played an increas­ing­ly impor­tant role on the inter­na­tion­al stage. 

“At the same time,” the offi­cial added, “the Chi­nese gov­ern­ment has embarked on a mis­sion to trans­form its mil­i­tary into a mod­ern force capa­ble of con­duct­ing a grow­ing range of mil­i­tary missions.” 

A decade ago, China’s army issued a new roles and mis­sions state­ment that goes beyond the country’s imme­di­ate ter­ri­to­r­i­al inter­ests. Some of the growth is good: Chi­na is par­tic­i­pat­ing in human­i­tar­i­an relief, peace­keep­ing, search and res­cue and coun­ter­pira­cy mis­sions. At the same time, “the lack of trans­paren­cy around China’s grow­ing capa­bil­i­ties and its inten­tions have raised ques­tions about Chi­nese invest­ments in the mil­i­tary and secu­ri­ty sphere,” the offi­cial said. 

This wor­ries plan­ners and strate­gists in the Pen­ta­gon. The Chi­nese have not been open about anti-access capa­bil­i­ties they are devel­op­ing, about cyber attacks, or even about the cost of their mil­i­tary effort, offi­cials said. 

In March, Chi­nese army lead­ers announced a 7.5 per­cent increase in the country’s mil­i­tary bud­get to about $78.6 bil­lion. “The [Defense Depart­ment] esti­mate of China’s total mil­i­tary-relat­ed spend­ing for 2009 stands at some $150 bil­lion,” the senior defense offi­cial said. 

“The com­plex­i­ty of the region­al and glob­al secu­ri­ty envi­ron­ment, as well as the advances in China’s mil­i­tary capa­bil­i­ties and its expand­ing mil­i­tary oper­a­tions and mis­sion, call for a sta­ble, reli­able and con­tin­u­ous dia­logue between the armed forces of the Unit­ed States and Chi­na to expand prac­ti­cal coop­er­a­tion where our nation­al inter­ests con­verge and to dis­cuss can­did­ly those areas where we have dis­agree­ment,” the senior defense offi­cial said. “Such dia­logue is espe­cial­ly impor­tant, we believe, dur­ing peri­ods when there is fric­tion and turbulence.” 

The Chi­nese end­ed the mil­i­tary-to-mil­i­tary dia­logue with the Unit­ed States after the Unit­ed States sold $6.4 bil­lion in defen­sive weapons to Tai­wan in accor­dance with the Tai­wan Rela­tions Act of 1979. It was the sec­ond such halt in recent years. 

Last year — the year cov­ered by the new report — Sino‑U.S. mil­i­tary-to-mil­i­tary rela­tions were good. But the on-again, off-again nature of China’s engage­ment with the U.S. mil­i­tary end­ed the peri­od of civil­i­ty and progress in the mil­i­tary-to-mil­i­tary relationship. 

The stop-and-go cycle lim­its the areas the two mil­i­taries can dis­cuss. Even more trou­bling giv­en China’s increas­ing mil­i­tary capa­bil­i­ties, this cycle increas­es the risk that mis­com­mu­ni­ca­tion and mis­per­cep­tion could lead to mis­cal­cu­la­tion, the offi­cial said. 

“More­over, we believe that it is in our mutu­al inter­ests … that we have a bal­anced and rec­i­p­ro­cal dia­logue allow­ing us to build mutu­al trust, coop­er­a­tive capac­i­ty, insti­tu­tion­al under­stand­ing, and devel­op com­mon views, all of those things on our nor­mal check­list, and that there is a real cost to the absence of mil­i­tary-mil­i­tary rela­tions,” the offi­cial said. 

The Unit­ed States has tried to restart the con­tacts. It is now up to Chi­na to make the next move and “demon­strate that it is in their inter­est to stay in that rela­tion­ship and that they desire to sus­tain these engage­ments through peri­ods of tur­bu­lence,” the offi­cial said. 

In the near term, the Chi­nese are prepar­ing for a Tai­wan con­tin­gency. Chi­na also is devel­op­ing the capa­bil­i­ty to attack at long range mil­i­tary forces oper­at­ing in the West­ern Pacif­ic. The capa­bil­i­ty still is lim­it­ed, but it can grow in num­bers and accu­ra­cy, the offi­cial said. 

Chi­na has the most active bal­lis­tic and cruise mis­sile devel­op­ment pro­gram in the world. The Chi­nese are devel­op­ing new class­es of mis­siles, upgrad­ing oth­ers and work­ing on coun­ter­ing bal­lis­tic mis­sile defenses. 

At sea, China’s navy has the largest force of prin­ci­pal com­bat­ant sub­marines and amphibi­ous war­fare ships in Asia. Chi­na con­tin­ues to invest heav­i­ly in nuclear-pow­ered sub­marines and diesel elec­tric boats. It’s also build­ing an air­craft car­ri­er and oth­er com­bat­ant sur­face ships. 

The Chi­nese are also devel­op­ing space and cyber capa­bil­i­ties, pur­su­ing the abil­i­ty to dom­i­nate across the spec­trum of infor­ma­tion in all its dimen­sions on mod­ern bat­tle space, the offi­cial said. 

“China’s invest­ment in advanced elec­tron­ic war­fare sys­tems, coun­ter­space weapons and com­put­er net­work oper­a­tions reflect the empha­sis and pri­or­i­ty China’s lead­ers place on build­ing capa­bil­i­ty in these areas,” the senior defense offi­cial said. 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →