USA — Department Hires Acquisitions Workers to Help Reforms

WASHINGTON — The Defense Depart­ment is mak­ing strides toward acqui­si­tion reform and bud­get reduc­tions, start­ing with the buildup of its fed­er­al acqui­si­tions work force, depart­ment offi­cials told a con­gres­sion­al pan­el today.

The depart­ment cre­at­ed the Office of Cost Assess­ment and Pro­gram Eval­u­a­tion and has hired more than 3,000 employ­ees since the end of March to improve its pur­chas­ing process­es, John Roth, deputy comp­trol­ler for pro­grams and bud­gets, told the House Over­sight and Gov­ern­ment Reform Committee’s nation­al secu­ri­ty sub­com­mit­tee.

Acqui­si­tion reform is a key com­po­nent of Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates’ efforts to improve process­es while also cut­ting over­head costs. Part of that reform calls for reduc­ing the department’s use of con­trac­tors and replac­ing them with fed­er­al work­ers. The new hires are the first step in reduc­ing con­trac­tors from 39 per­cent to 26 per­cent of the department’s work force, Roth said. Offi­cials are request­ing an addi­tion­al $218 mil­lion in the fis­cal 2011 bud­get to expand the reform efforts, he said.

“Good peo­ple are an essen­tial ele­ment of any acqui­si­tion reform strat­e­gy,” said Nan­cy Spruill, the department’s direc­tor of acqui­si­tion resources and analy­sis, who also spoke before the sub­com­mit­tee. “We’re com­mit­ted to grow­ing the work force. But, more than num­bers, we are focused on qual­i­ty. We are pleased that we’re attract­ing tal­ent­ed peo­ple every day to help us work on acqui­si­tion reform.”

In addi­tion, Roth said, the sec­re­tary already had made “unprece­dent­ed cuts” to major weapons pro­grams that are under­per­form­ing or over bud­get. Over­all cost sav­ings will be con­vert­ed to sus­tain com­bat pow­er and make future invest­ments, he said.

“The depart­ment has had a change of empha­sis,” Roth said. “That change is to a stronger, bet­ter-con­trolled busi­ness envi­ron­ment.”

The depart­ment has 102 major acqui­si­tions pro­grams, and is focus­ing its reforms on the ones in which it can inter­vene in the ear­ly stages, Spruill said. “We have an increased empha­sis on the front end of the process,” she said, start­ing pro­grams right, review­ing them ear­ly on and get­ting inde­pen­dent reviews.

Depart­ment offi­cials are work­ing hard to imple­ment the reforms of the 2009 Weapons Sys­tem Acqui­si­tion Reform Act and the pro­vi­sions of reform leg­is­la­tion this year, Spruill said. “We have made sup­port to the warfight­er our high­est pri­or­i­ty, and we are improv­ing the acqui­si­tions work force,” she said.

Bet­ter sys­tems engi­neer­ing, tech­ni­cal matu­ri­ty, and espe­cial­ly cost esti­mate improve­ments are dri­ving reform, Spruill said, adding that cost esti­mates are the most dif­fi­cult.

Michael J. Sul­li­van, the Gen­er­al Account­abil­i­ty Office’s direc­tor of acqui­si­tion and sourc­ing man­age­ment, also spoke to the sub­com­mit­tee, and out­lined Defense Depart­ment progress on acqui­si­tion reform since the GAO report­ed in 2008 on prob­lems in 42 pro­grams. Acqui­si­tions work­ers, he said, have done a good job of rec­og­niz­ing prob­lems, and are on track to make long-term changes.

Under Gates’ lead­er­ship, Sul­li­van not­ed, 13 pro­grams were removed from the department’s acqui­si­tions port­fo­lio at a cost sav­ings of $179 bil­lion.

Defense acqui­si­tions prob­lems have exist­ed for decades, Sul­li­van said, but change is pos­si­ble “when we have lead­er­ship in the depart­ment like we do now.”

“It boils down to account­abil­i­ty and lead­er­ship, and when lead­er­ship takes charge of things, things can hap­pen,” he said.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →