U.S‑Turkish Alliance in Good Shape, Gates Says

WASHINGTON, Oct. 18, 2010 — The U.S.-Turkey alliance is built on fun­da­men­tal com­mon inter­ests, and the defense part­ner­ship between the two nations is as close as it has ever been, Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates said here today.

Gates was the keynote speak­er at the Amer­i­can Turk­ish Coun­cil Con­ven­tion at the Ritz-Carl­ton Hotel. The Unit­ed States and Turkey are allies that have fought togeth­er in Korea, Koso­vo and Kab­ul, and remain allies even when they dis­agree, he said.

“Even as our views and approach­es on some issues may dif­fer, we are allies, we share fun­da­men­tal inter­ests in the region, and our goals remain the same: A respect for sov­er­eign­ty and rule of law; eco­nom­ic growth and devel­op­ment; and endur­ing sta­bil­i­ty and secu­ri­ty,” Gates said.

Turkey is a stal­wart NATO ally and has 1,700 troops in Afghanistan. Gates thanked Turkey for lead­ing the Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Force in the past and for extend­ing its com­mand of the Kab­ul Region­al Com­mand for anoth­er year. Gates also com­pli­ment­ed Turkey for its engage­ment with Iraq. He said Turk­ish lead­ers reg­u­lar­ly work with Iraqis “to rein­force that nation’s emerg­ing democ­ra­cy, encour­ag­ing nation­al rec­on­cil­i­a­tion ini­tia­tives and work­ing to rebuild defense and secu­ri­ty ties with the Iraqi Secu­ri­ty Forces.”

The sec­re­tary reaf­firmed the U.S. pledge to con­front the PKK -– a Kur­dish ter­ror­ist group that has tar­get­ed Turkey, as well as its offi­cials and mil­i­tary.

“In response to the rise in PKK ter­ror­ist attacks against Turk­ish mil­i­tary forces and civil­ians over the past year, the U.S. has increased its efforts to crack down on PKK crim­i­nal enter­pris­es, enhanced its intel­li­gence sup­port, and reached out to our Euro­pean allies to encour­age them to freeze PKK assets in Europe,” he said.

Gates also touched upon the need for NATO reform, and urged all NATO nations to sup­port the new strate­gic con­cept that heads of state will dis­cuss and vote on at next month’s Lis­bon Sum­mit in Por­tu­gal.

The threats have changed over the years, Gates said, and NATO must change too. “Reflect­ing this strate­gic real­i­ty, NATO is now pur­su­ing new mis­sions far from its orig­i­nal geo­graph­ic bound­aries –- whether in the hills of the Hin­du Kush or off the coast of Soma­lia,” the sec­re­tary said.

NATO is chang­ing oper­a­tional­ly, Gates said. How­ev­er, like the Defense Depart­ment, he added, the alliance requires struc­tur­al reform.

“The alliance has long had too many com­mit­tees, too many head­quar­ters and too much bureau­cra­cy over­see­ing too few deploy­able and prop­er­ly resourced mil­i­tary capa­bil­i­ties,” he said. “To some degree, the insti­tu­tion­al reforms being pur­sued at NATO reflect many of the changes under­way in our own Depart­ment of Defense -– all for the pur­pose of reduc­ing over­head and shift­ing more resources to our fight­ing forces.”

Gates also wants the NATO allies to agree to take up the phased adap­tive approach to mis­sile defense. Rogue states, such as Iran, can launch mis­siles against NATO allies, he said. “Two-and-a-half years ago in Bucharest, NATO’s heads of state and gov­ern­ment rec­og­nized the need for an alliance-wide response to the threat of bal­lis­tic mis­siles in the hands of those who might seek to intim­i­date or harm NATO,” he said. “We resolved then to devel­op options that could extend cov­er­age to all Euro­pean allied ter­ri­to­ry and pop­u­la­tions, a res­o­lu­tion echoed at sub­se­quent high-lev­el meet­ings.”

The phased adap­tive approach, Gates said, offers a ter­ri­to­r­i­al mis­sile defense sys­tem based on proven tech­nolo­gies that can be adapt­ed to meet future dan­gers and pro­tect a steadi­ly increas­ing swath of NATO ter­ri­to­ry.

“As the threat from bal­lis­tic mis­siles grows, so will the scope and effec­tive­ness of NATO’s defens­es against them,” he said. “Our object is the fullest-pos­si­ble cov­er­age of NATO allies and, over time, to pro­vide cov­er­age for all of NATO.”

The first phase becomes oper­a­tional next year, Gates said, with sea-based SM‑3 inter­cep­tor mis­siles deployed to areas where the threat is great­est. The sec­ond phase, due in 2015, involves plac­ing upgrad­ed, ground-based SM-3s in Roma­nia as well as at sea.

“Phas­es three and four will deploy even more advanced inter­cep­tors, includ­ing a sec­ond land-based inter­cep­tor site in Poland,” he said. “Over­all, this approach pro­vides the alliance with a great deal of flex­i­bil­i­ty to pro­tect against the range of threats posed by bal­lis­tic mis­siles, and to adapt as new threats devel­op and old ones recede.”

Gates said he wants to keep the U.S.-Turkish rela­tion­ship on track.

“The Unit­ed States and Turkey have wise­ly remem­bered our friend­ship dur­ing times of agree­ment and dis­agree­ment, and it is incum­bent for us to con­tin­ue to do so,” he said. “There is too much at stake for us not to do so –- for our pros­per­i­ty, for our secu­ri­ty, and for the cred­i­bil­i­ty of our alliance.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →