U.S. Presence Necessary for Korean Security, Officials Say

WASHINGTON, Sept. 16, 2010 — The sink­ing in March of the South Kore­an ship Cheo­nan under­scores the impor­tance of U.S. troops to secu­ri­ty in North­east Asia and the defense of South Korea, top defense offi­cials told Con­gress today.

“North Korea’s tor­pe­do attack is a somber reminder of the active threat North Korea pos­es to region­al sta­bil­i­ty,” Wal­lace “Chip” Greg­son, assis­tant sec­re­tary of defense for Asian and Pacif­ic secu­ri­ty affairs, said. “In such a high-threat envi­ron­ment, the [U.S.-South Kore­an] alliance mis­sion to deter and defend takes on added sig­nif­i­cance and is our pri­ma­ry focus.” 

Speak­ing to the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vice Com­mit­tee, Greg­son expressed his con­cern with North Korea’s attack, which killed 46 South Kore­an sailors, and its con­tin­ued pur­suit of nuclear weapons. North Kore­an arms sales and con­tin­ued defi­ance of Unit­ed Nations secu­ri­ty res­o­lu­tions, he added, pose a threat not only to South Korea, but also to the entire region. 

“[North Korea’s] proven track record of mar­ry­ing capa­bil­i­ties with dead­ly intent has result­ed in unnec­es­sary cri­sis, ten­sion esca­la­tion, and as the attack on the Cheo­nan demon­strat­ed, trag­ic loss of life,” he said. 

Greg­son, a retired Marine Corps lieu­tenant gen­er­al, said deter­ring North Korea requires a com­plex mil­i­tary solu­tion. North Korea’s con­ven­tion­al threat and pur­suit of bal­lis­tic and nuclear capa­bil­i­ties caus­es con­cern in Wash­ing­ton and in the South Kore­an cap­i­tal of Seoul, he said. 

North Korea’s mil­i­tary is adapt­ed to the U.S.-South Korea con­ven­tion­al mil­i­tary part­ner­ship, Greg­son said, and has devel­oped tac­tics and weapons sys­tems that may allow North Korea to avoid con­fronting its targets. 

“In the con­text of [North Kore­an] efforts to devel­op a nuclear pro­gram, its bal­lis­tic mis­sile efforts become an even greater con­cern,” he said. “Nuclear and bal­lis­tic mis­siles, if devel­oped and field­ed, would pose a threat to region­al peace and sta­bil­i­ty that would be orders of mag­ni­tude greater than the already height­ened threat. 

“North Korea may become embold­en to pur­sue even more provoca­tive activ­i­ties than we have wit­nessed in recent years,” he con­tin­ued, “if it makes sig­nif­i­cant strides in its devel­op­ment of nuclear weapons and bal­lis­tic mis­sile technology.” 

Greg­son said he is con­fi­dent the U.S.-South Kore­an part­ner­ship will improve peace in the region, but to sus­tain inter­na­tion­al peace and secu­ri­ty, the U.S. mil­i­tary must remain pos­tured in South Korea. 

“To pre­serve our secu­ri­ty com­mit­ment to the Repub­lic of Korea, the Unit­ed States must main­tain a for­ward mil­i­tary pos­ture,” he said. “[Hav­ing] 28,500 troops sta­tioned some­where in the Unit­ed States does not have the same deter­rent effect as the same num­ber sta­tioned in Korea. It is our for­ward pres­ence that most effec­tive­ly com­mu­ni­cates our resolve to defend our allies and pre­serve our vital inter­ests in Asia. Suc­cess­ful deter­rence relies on cred­i­bil­i­ty as much, if not more than, capability.” 

The Strate­gic Alliance 2015 agree­ment ensures near­ly 30,000 Amer­i­can troops will remain in South Korea until 2015. Accord­ing to the 1953 armistice that estab­lished a cease-fire to the Kore­an War, the U.S. mil­i­tary would main­tain oper­a­tional con­trol of com­bined defens­es until 2012. But South Kore­an Pres­i­dent Lee Myung-bak asked to extend the tran­si­tion to 2015 as a result of the Cheo­nan attack. Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma agreed. 

Army Gen. Wal­ter L. “Skip” Sharp, com­man­der of U.S. forces in Korea, tes­ti­fied with Greg­son. He said he believes the Cheo­nan attack will not be the last by North Korea, and that the regime’s pur­suit of nuclear weapons and long-range capa­bil­i­ties sug­gest North Korea will con­tin­ue to threat­en the region. 

“The con­ven­tion­al threat con­tin­ues, but we now face an ene­my capa­ble of using a num­ber of asym­met­ri­cal means to threat­en its neigh­bors, while also vio­lat­ing past agree­ments, inter­na­tion­al norms and the Unit­ed Nations Secu­ri­ty Coun­cil res­o­lu­tion,” he said. 

The new alliance agree­ment, which Sharp intro­duced last week, means more joint train­ing and exer­cis­es. The two nations have launched a series of air, land and sea exer­cis­es to bet­ter pre­pare South Korea defens­es, he said. 

Strate­gic Alliance 2015 syn­chro­nizes South Kore­an and U.S. trans­for­ma­tion ini­tia­tives as the alliance pre­pares for the trans­fer of oper­a­tional con­trol for com­bined defense, Sharp said, and it demon­strates the U.S. com­mit­ment to South Korea. 

“Strate­gic Alliance 2015 will enable the Repub­lic of Korea and U.S. forces to suc­cess­ful­ly con­front future secu­ri­ty chal­lenges and set the con­di­tions for last­ing peace in the Kore­an penin­su­la and the region,” the gen­er­al said. “The Repub­lic of Korea and the Unit­ed States are more strong­ly unit­ed than ever before to deter North Kore­an provo­ca­tions and aggres­sion, and to defeat them if necessary.” 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →