STRATCOM Chief Discusses U.S. Nuclear Triad

WASHINGTON, Oct. 19, 2011 — While 10 years of war have focused the mil­i­tary on con­ven­tion­al weapons, the nation’s nuclear force is in need of atten­tion, a senior offi­cer told defense reporters yes­ter­day.

Air Force Gen. C. Robert “Bob” Kehler leads U.S. Strate­gic Com­mand, which with its sub­or­di­nate and func­tion­al com­mands is respon­si­ble for mis­sile defense; glob­al strike; intel­li­gence, sur­veil­lance and recon­nais­sance; cyber defense and space oper­a­tions, as well as com­bat­ing weapons of mass destruc­tion.

Stratcom’s nuclear mis­sion is one of its “big three” respon­si­bil­i­ties, along with space and cyber, Kehler said.

The U.S. nuclear tri­ad includes 450 land-based inter­con­ti­nen­tal bal­lis­tic mis­siles, strate­gic mis­siles deliv­er­able by 76 Air Force B‑52s and 20 B‑2s, and 18 Navy Ohio-class sub­marines car­ry­ing bal­lis­tic or cruise mis­siles.

While sus­tain­ing cur­rent sys­tems is an imme­di­ate issue, the tri­ad also needs to be mod­ern­ized in the com­ing decades, Kehler said, not­ing the Ohio-class sub­ma­rine fleet like­ly will reach the end of its ser­vice life in the late 2020s.

“That will come because of rea­sons that the Navy under­stands well about oper­at­ing plat­forms that are con­stant­ly sub­ject­ed to [pres­sure vari­a­tions],” he said. “We’re going to have to make some deci­sions … [that will] require us to have some mod­ern­iza­tion pro­grams in place.”

All three of the tri­ad legs “need to be sus­tained … until replace­ments come along. And, of course, the replace­ments are being dis­cussed in the bud­get dis­cus­sions, as well,” Kehler said.

The Air Force plans to replace the B‑52 fleet with a long-range strike plat­form or fam­i­ly of sys­tems, which Air Force lead­ers have said would cen­ter on a new long-range, pen­e­trat­ing bomber, a glob­al strike sys­tem, a long-range stand­off weapon, and an enabler sys­tem.

Stratcom’s chief said his orga­ni­za­tion has set three require­ments for the new sys­tem: it must be tru­ly long range; it must be able to pen­e­trate defens­es; and it must serve as both a con­ven­tion­al and a nuclear plat­form.

While Strat­com has not set a spe­cif­ic intel­li­gence, recon­nais­sance and sur­veil­lance require­ment for the new sys­tem, Kehler said, the val­ue of a plat­form that can both drop bombs and gath­er intel­li­gence is clear.

“The more flex­i­bil­i­ty that we can include in plat­forms today, the bet­ter,” he said.

Over the course of its active ser­vice with the Air Force begin­ning in 1955, the B‑52 has served as a plat­form for con­ven­tion­al bombs, smart weapons and nuclear weapons, he said.

The cur­rent chal­lenge is sus­tain­ing the B‑52 as a stand­off nuclear plat­form until a new long-range strike capa­bil­i­ty comes on line, Kehler said.

What air­craft or mis­siles the Air Force will ulti­mate­ly select and fund for future long-range strike mis­sions still is under dis­cus­sion, he added.

Defense Sec­re­tary Leon E. Panet­ta has been clear that he wants defense bud­get deci­sions to be based on strat­e­gy, and plan­ning dis­cus­sions now under­way are tak­ing that approach, Kehler said.

“I con­tin­ue to stand by the need for a tri­ad; cer­tain­ly in the near term, I believe that we can sus­tain a tri­ad,” the gen­er­al said. “I think there are going to be inter­est­ing ques­tions about both the scope and pace of mod­ern­iza­tion as we go for­ward.”

The U.S.-Russia strate­gic arms reduc­tion treaty known as “New START” that took effect this year sets nuclear force ceil­ings at 1,550 deployed weapons and 750 deployed launch­ers, Kehler not­ed.

“In that struc­ture, I believe a tri­ad of forces makes the most strate­gic … [and] oper­a­tional sense,” he said. “As we look into the strate­gic future, the answer about whether or not we’re going to need a tri­ad, I think, is ‘it depends.’ ”

Future arms con­trol agree­ments, force struc­ture and bud­get lev­els will fac­tor into the deci­sion of whether to reduce the tri­ad, he said.

“Can we, in fact, as we look to mod­ern­ize … afford to spend the resources to mod­ern­ize the entire tri­ad? Those are not all ques­tions for today,” Kehler said.

A viable nuclear force requires suf­fi­cient force struc­ture, exper­tise, and indus­tri­al-base sup­port for weapons, he said.

“You can have a hol­low nuclear force, and we need to be very care­ful about that,” he added.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →