South Korea Mission Strategically Important, Officials Say

WASHINGTON, March 28, 2012 — U.S. forces in South Korea help to sus­tain an impor­tant alliance, deter an unpre­dictable threat and sup­port the nation­al defense strategy’s shift toward the Asia-Pacif­ic region, senior defense offi­cials told Con­gress today.

Peter Lavoy, act­ing assis­tant sec­re­tary of defense for Asian and Pacif­ic secu­ri­ty affairs, tes­ti­fied along with Army Gen. James D. Thur­man, com­man­der of U.S. Forces Korea, before the House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee in a hear­ing exam­in­ing the secu­ri­ty sit­u­a­tion on the Kore­an peninsula. 

“For over 60 years, the Unit­ed States has main­tained a pres­ence on the Kore­an penin­su­la to deter aggres­sion against … [South Korea] and to fight and win, should deter­rence fail,” Lavoy said. 

The U.S.-South Kore­an alliance con­tin­ues to be a cor­ner­stone of U.S. region­al strat­e­gy, and depart­ment and mil­i­tary lead­ers will con­tin­ue to strength­en that alliance, make U.S. forces there more effi­cient and effec­tive, and enhance pres­ence, pow­er pro­jec­tion and deter­rence in the region, he added. 

Lavoy said North Korea’s “provoca­tive behav­ior” con­tin­ues to present a seri­ous threat to the Unit­ed States, its allies, and the region. He not­ed that North Korea has a large con­ven­tion­al mil­i­tary and is pur­su­ing bal­lis­tic mis­sile and weapons-of-mass-destruc­tion pro­grams, includ­ing ura­ni­um enrichment. 

In response to that threat, he said, the U.S. and South Kore­an gov­ern­ments and mil­i­taries are work­ing to strength­en strate­gic capa­bil­i­ties, fur­ther inte­grate oper­a­tions and work from an alliance per­spec­tive to meet cur­rent and emerg­ing threats. 

The two coun­tries have a com­pre­hen­sive plan under the Strate­gic Alliance 2015 frame­work to tran­si­tion wartime oper­a­tional con­trol from the U.S.-South Kore­an com­bined forces com­mand to the South Kore­an joint chiefs of staff by Decem­ber 2015, Lavoy told the pan­el. The tran­si­tion will allow South Korea to lead its nation­al defense while main­tain­ing an endur­ing U.S. defense com­mit­ment and capa­bil­i­ty, he said. 

In line with the strate­gic agree­ment, U.S. forces will con­sol­i­date and relo­cate from the met­ro­pol­i­tan area of the South Kore­an cap­i­tal of Seoul to cen­tral­ized loca­tions south of the city, he said. The move will improve effi­cien­cy, reduce costs, and enhance force pro­tec­tion by plac­ing most ser­vice mem­bers and equip­ment out­side the effec­tive range of North Kore­an artillery, Lavoy told the committee. 

Thur­man said the U.S.-South Kore­an rela­tion­ship is “the finest mil­i­tary part­ner­ship I have expe­ri­enced in my 37-year career.” 

As the demo­c­ra­t­ic, wealth­i­er south­ern neigh­bor of a closed-off North Korea, Thur­man said, South Korea faces the threat of attack or provo­ca­tion that can come with lit­tle or no warning. 

“Our deter­rent capa­bil­i­ty is based on U.S. and [South Kore­an] mil­i­tary readi­ness, and this is my pri­ma­ry focus,” the gen­er­al said. “I have con­duct­ed a thor­ough review, includ­ing two com­bined exer­cis­es, and I have deter­mined our forces remain ready to defend the … Kore­an peninsula.” 

Both mil­i­taries are well-equipped, well-trained and pro­fes­sion­al, Thur­man said, while the alliance is strong and the U.S. pres­ence pro­vides a sta­bi­liz­ing influ­ence in the region. 

“I think just by hav­ing a for­ward pres­ence, that is a calm­ing effect,” he added. 

His forces train to respond to chem­i­cal and bio­log­i­cal as well as con­ven­tion­al weapons attacks, Thur­man said, and work hand in hand with South Kore­an forces on cyber defense. 

“I have come to real­ize that cyber is a key warfight­ing domain,” he said. “It is [as] impor­tant as our air, mar­itime and ground operations.” 

Thur­man said he would wel­come pro­duc­tive talks between the Unit­ed States and North Korea, “but my sense is the [approach they have] tak­en with their mil­i­tary-first pol­i­cy is not going to change.” 

Thur­man said his force num­bers and equip­ment are able to meet the mis­sion, but he acknowl­edged he’d like to see some adjust­ments. While he has enough troops, the stan­dard one-year tour junior ser­vice mem­bers serve in South Korea cre­ates a “churn” of 600 to 700 men and women arriv­ing or leav­ing each month, he said. 

“So I have asked [Gen. Ray­mond T. Odier­no, Army chief of staff] and the Army to look at how we can build readi­ness at best val­ue, and see what we can do,” he said. “And I’m very mind­ful of the cost, and I don’t want to cre­ate a require­ment that is not oper­a­tional­ly focused.” 

The gen­er­al said he’d also like to increase his air capabilities. 

“We do not have a full com­bat avi­a­tion brigade there,” Thur­man not­ed. “I have asked the depart­ment as well as the Depart­ment of the Army and back through [U.S. Pacif­ic Com­mand] and the Joint Staff to look at adding that bat­tal­ion back that was repo­si­tioned out of there to meet require­ments for the war in Iraq and Afghanistan.” 

Thur­man empha­sized his forces feel a sense of sat­is­fac­tion in their mission. 

“I think what makes Korea unique is we have a threat to the north. We have a well-stat­ed mis­sion. And I have not seen a decline [in] any morale issues,” he said. “This requires active lead­ers, lead­ers that are sen­si­tive to the needs of their ser­vice mem­bers. And that’s where I put my effort in mak­ing sure that, if there [are] any qual­i­ty-of-life issues, then we quick­ly try to resolve that.” 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →