Defense Office Protects Privacy, Liberties of Troops, Civilians

WASHINGTON — A small and lit­tle-known Defense Depart­ment office has the big task of pro­tect­ing ser­vice mem­bers’ and civil­ian employ­ees’ per­son­al infor­ma­tion in the dig­i­tal world, while also get­ting accus­tomed to its new charge of pro­tect­ing their civ­il lib­er­ties.

The Defense Pri­va­cy and Civ­il Lib­er­ties Office is work­ing to reduce offi­cial uses of Social Secu­ri­ty num­bers and to edu­cate the work­force about appro­pri­ate uses of social net­work­ing and the need for encrypt­ing work­place email, the office’s direc­tor, Michael E. Reheuser, said dur­ing a recent inter­view with Amer­i­can Forces Press Ser­vice.

“We want to make sure that every­thing we do across the depart­ment, we’re doing the best we can to pro­tect people’s pri­va­cy inter­ests, and their civ­il lib­er­ties inter­ests,” he said.

The pri­va­cy side of the office began in the 1970s post-Water­gate era over con­cerns about gov­ern­ment intru­sions. It car­ried out its charge of giv­ing advice, train­ing and fil­ing offi­cial reports for decades, while evolv­ing into the Infor­ma­tion Age with its added poten­tial for wide­spread mis­use of per­son­al infor­ma­tion online, said Reheuser, a retired Marine Corps colonel who served as DOD’s asso­ciate deputy gen­er­al coun­sel before head­ing up the pri­va­cy and civ­il lib­er­ties office.

Con­gress added the civ­il lib­er­ties com­po­nent in DOD and sev­en oth­er depart­ments and agen­cies two years ago at the rec­om­men­da­tion of the 9/11 Com­mis­sion, which focused on the need for bet­ter infor­ma­tion-shar­ing among fed­er­al agen­cies to pre­vent ter­ror­ist attacks. As part of its civ­il lib­er­ties work, the office is charged with ensur­ing that agen­cies don’t share infor­ma­tion that infringes on civ­il lib­er­ties, Reheuser said.

The office, which reports to Michael L. Rhodes, direc­tor of admin­is­tra­tion and man­age­ment in the Office of the Sec­re­tary of Defense, must file quar­ter­ly reports to Con­gress regard­ing DOD pri­va­cy and civ­il lib­er­ties mat­ters. It filed its first report on civ­il lib­er­ties in the last quar­ter, Reheuser said.

The office focus­es pri­mar­i­ly on inter­nal issues � those of ser­vice mem­bers and DOD civil­ians — which range from pro­tect­ing Social Secu­ri­ty num­bers and Inter­net-based infor­ma­tion on the pri­va­cy side, to ensur­ing First Amend­ment pro­tec­tions of reli­gion and free speech on the civ­il lib­er­ties side, Reheuser said.

Exam­ples of com­plaints referred to the office include that of a ser­vice mem­ber who drove his car on base bear­ing a bumper stick­er crit­i­cal of the com­man­der in chief, and those from ser­vice mem­bers who said their reli­gious-based dietary restric­tions were com­pro­mised by room­mates. The office also may look into exter­nal issues, such as pos­si­ble rights vio­la­tions of civil­ian vis­i­tors to mil­i­tary prop­er­ties, but those are rare, Reheuser said.

The office does not adju­di­cate cas­es, Reheuser stressed, but rather inves­ti­gates whether the prop­er rules and reg­u­la­tions are in place to safe­guard against prob­lems, then reports its find­ings to Con­gress.

“We’re try­ing to avoid dupli­cat­ing what’s already in place,” he said. “We have lots of great mech­a­nisms for peo­ple con­cerned about issues to report those, and we don’t want add a new lay­er to that. What we want to do is make sure we gath­er the infor­ma­tion about those com­plaints and report it to Con­gress.”

With only 20 employ­ees, Reheuser said, the office reviews every DOD instruc­tion and pol­i­cy to make sure all fol­low pri­va­cy and civ­il lib­er­ties laws. Because of its small staff, the office relies on the mil­i­tary ser­vices and oth­er DOD offices to inform its work, and share infor­ma­tion about the office, he said.

The office’s pri­or­i­ties now are on reduc­ing offi­cial uses of Social Secu­ri­ty num­bers and train­ing employ­ees on breach man­age­ment on the pri­va­cy side, and on stand­ing up the civ­il lib­er­ties side, Reheuser said.

With Social Secu­ri­ty num­bers, he said, “We want to make sure that, as a depart­ment, we are not unnec­es­sar­i­ly using Social Secu­ri­ty num­bers because we know that if that infor­ma­tion is stolen, it can lead to iden­ti­ty theft very quick­ly.”

Reheuser said he has received reports of unnec­es­sary uses of Social Secu­ri­ty num­bers, such as ser­vice mem­bers hav­ing to present them to check out a vol­ley­ball at a gym. The office is assist­ing in the review of all forms used to col­lect Social Secu­ri­ty num­bers and elim­i­nate all for which the num­bers aren’t essen­tial to busi­ness, he said.

The office also is work­ing to train and edu­cate ser­vice mem­bers and employ­ees that they need to encrypt all email that con­tain per­son­al­ly iden­ti­fi­able infor­ma­tion, and to send to peo­ple on a need-to-know basis only.

With more than 7 mil­lion com­put­ers and hand­held devices in the depart­ment, “there are lots of ways that peo­ple inad­ver­tent­ly share per­son­al­ly iden­ti­fi­able infor­ma­tion,” Reheuser said.

“If you’re rely­ing sole­ly on the fire­walls, you prob­a­bly should be more care­ful than that,” he said. “Encryp­tion safe­guards beyond fire­walls.”

The pri­va­cy and civ­il lib­er­ties office does­n’t have the lead on social net­work­ing, but does mon­i­tor poli­cies and prac­tices, and offer train­ing and advice. Most­ly, Reheuser said, peo­ple just need to be more cau­tious.

“Social media is becom­ing more of a threat as more and more peo­ple use it, and they’re slop­py about it,” he said. “If you watch what peo­ple tweet, and what they blog, and what they post to Face­book, you won­der, ‘Did you real­ly want to say that? Did you real­ly think it through?’

“Our big catch phrase is, ‘Think before you post,’ ” he con­tin­ued. “Think to your­self, would I put this on a sign in my front yard? If not, then you might not want to put it on the Inter­net, because once you put it up there, you can’t get it back.”

With more than 1,500 offi­cial DOD web­sites, there is no real way to mon­i­tor even offi­cial sites, Reheuser acknowl­edged, so the office is work­ing to edu­cate every­one on good Inter­net prac­tices whether they work on offi­cial sites or for their own use.

“We rely a lot on the indi­vid­ual judg­ment of our sol­diers, sailors, air­men and Marines, and we’re try­ing to edu­cate them and let them know that some­thing that might be appro­pri­ate for a civil­ian to post, is not appro­pri­ate for a ser­vice mem­ber,” he said.

“Peo­ple real­ly do think, ‘This is mine, and I can say what­ev­er I want on it,’ and of course we want to encour­age free­dom of speech,” he added. “But in the mil­i­tary, we don’t have as much free­dom of speech as we do out­side the mil­i­tary.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →