Debt Reduction ‘Sequestration’ Concerns Panetta, Mullen

WASHINGTON, Aug. 4, 2011 — The “seques­tra­tion” mech­a­nism in the nation’s new debt-reduc­tion law is unac­cept­able giv­en the mul­ti­tude of threats fac­ing Amer­i­ca, Defense Sec­re­tary Leon E. Panet­ta said here today.

The mech­a­nism auto­mat­i­cal­ly would kick in exten­sive spend­ing cuts — $500 bil­lion from defense spend­ing over 10 years on top of $350 bil­lion in spend­ing reduc­tion already iden­ti­fied over that peri­od — if Con­gress fails to take fur­ther deficit-reduc­tion action. 

This kind of ‘dooms­day’ mech­a­nism that was built into the agree­ment is designed so that it would only take effect if Con­gress fails to enact fur­ther mea­sures to reduce the deficit,” Panet­ta said, speak­ing at his first Pen­ta­gon news con­fer­ence since tak­ing office July 1. “But if it hap­pened – and, God will­ing, that would not be the case – but if it did hap­pen, it would result in a fur­ther round of very dan­ger­ous cuts across the board — defense cuts that I believe would do real dam­age to our secu­ri­ty, our troops and their fam­i­lies, and our military’s abil­i­ty to pro­tect the nation.” 

He said seques­tra­tion would pro­duce an out­come “that would be com­plete­ly unac­cept­able to me as sec­re­tary of defense, to the pres­i­dent, and to our nation’s leaders.” 

The Amer­i­can peo­ple also would reject such an action, the sec­re­tary added. “They expect us to pro­tect our core nation­al secu­ri­ty inter­ests while meet­ing rea­son­able sav­ings tar­gets,” he said. 

Reduc­tions in defense spend­ing must be made “based on sound strat­e­gy and pol­i­cy, and with the best advice of our ser­vice chiefs and ser­vice sec­re­taries on how to pro­ceed,” Panet­ta said. 

Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said all the ser­vice chiefs agree with Panetta’s assess­ment of the leg­is­la­tion. The chair­man has long main­tained that an unchecked and ris­ing nation­al debt is the great­est threat to nation­al secu­ri­ty, and that he under­stands defense spend­ing must be controlled. 

But [the Joint Chiefs] also – to a one – share your con­cerns about the dev­as­tat­ing impact of fur­ther auto­mat­ic cuts should the Con­gress fail to enact addi­tion­al deficit reduc­tion mea­sures,” Mullen said dur­ing the news con­fer­ence. “The Defense Depart­ment may rep­re­sent 50 per­cent of the dis­cre­tionary bud­get in this coun­try, but there is noth­ing dis­cre­tionary about the things we do every day for our fel­low citizens.” 

Panet­ta said the first round of cuts called for in the new law – some $350 bil­lion over 10 years –large­ly are in line with what DOD lead­ers were expect­ing and prepar­ing to implement. 

Make no mis­take about it, we will face some very tough chal­lenges here as we try to meet those num­bers,” Panet­ta said, “but those num­bers are with­in the ball­park that we were dis­cussing with both the pres­i­dent as well as with [the Office of Man­age­ment and Budget].” 

Across-the-board cuts imposed in the 1970s and 1990s result­ed in a force left under­sized and under­fund­ed rel­a­tive to its mis­sions and respon­si­bil­i­ties, Panet­ta said. The process “hol­lowed out” the mil­i­tary, he added, and the nation can­not accept this because the Unit­ed States is at war. 

We face a broad and grow­ing range of secu­ri­ty threats and chal­lenges that our mil­i­tary must be pre­pared to con­front – from ter­ror­ist net­works to rogue nations to ris­ing pow­ers wait­ing to see if we have lost our edge,” the sec­re­tary said. 

The Pen­ta­gon will do its part to fight the deficit, Panet­ta said, acknowl­edg­ing that the Unit­ed States is fac­ing tough eco­nom­ic times. But these times can­not impinge on the country’s need to pro­tect itself, he added. 

We also have to always remem­ber those who are doing their part in the defense of this nation: our men and women in uni­form and their fam­i­lies,” he said. “Through­out this process, I will be work­ing close­ly with the lead­ers of this depart­ment … to ensure that we do not break faith with our troops or their fam­i­lies. I have no high­er respon­si­bil­i­ty as sec­re­tary of defense than to do every­thing I can to pro­tect and sup­port them.” 

Panet­ta stressed that the mil­i­tary is an all-vol­un­teer force and that this is what makes the Amer­i­can mil­i­tary the best in the world. “I have no high­er respon­si­bil­i­ty as sec­re­tary of defense but to do every­thing I can to pro­tect and sup­port them,” he said. “Every deci­sion I make will be made with them in mind. They put their lives on the line, [and] too many have made the ulti­mate sac­ri­fice on behalf of this coun­try. We owe it to them to do this right and to do this responsibly.” 

Mullen said the depart­ment already has start­ed look­ing for effi­cien­cies, not­ing that a com­pre­hen­sive review is under way to assess the impact of bud­get reduc­tions on force struc­ture and capa­bil­i­ty, and ulti­mate­ly, on mis­sions and America’s role in the world. “The cuts required by this agree­ment over the next 10 years are cer­tain­ly in keep­ing with the president’s pre­vi­ous bud­getary direc­tion, and we are already hard at work inside the com­pre­hen­sive review process to find the req­ui­site sav­ings,” he said. 

The U.S. mil­i­tary is involved in two wars and a num­ber of oth­er actions in the world. Amer­i­can ser­vice mem­bers have had to be ready for a range of mis­sions from earth­quake relief in Haiti to pro­vid­ing sup­port to NATO over Libya, Mullen said. 

The U.S. mil­i­tary remains a lynch­pin to defend­ing our nation­al inter­ests,” the chair­man said. “To loosen that pin unnec­es­sar­i­ly through debil­i­tat­ing and capri­cious cuts near­ly dou­ble to those already in the off­ing puts at grave risk not only our abil­i­ty to accom­plish the mis­sions we have been assigned, but those we have yet to be assigned as well.” 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →