Petraeus: Counterinsurgency Strategy Has ‘Borne Fruit’

WASHINGTON, July 12, 2011 — The com­man­der of the NATO-led Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Force, the offi­cer many view as the archi­tect of the Defense Department’s coun­terin­sur­gency strat­e­gy, assessed its results in Afghanistan as he pre­pares to retire.

Dur­ing his last full week com­mand­ing coali­tion and U.S. forces in Afghanistan, Army Gen. David H. Petraeus dis­cussed his tenure there with NATO TV yes­ter­day.

“What we have done is imple­ment the so-called NATO com­pre­hen­sive approach, a civ­il-mil­i­tary cam­paign … that does indeed embody many of the prin­ci­ples of the coun­terin­sur­gency field man­u­al that we devel­oped back in 2006, and which we employed in Iraq in the surge of 2007–2008,” he said. “I think gen­er­al­ly, it has borne fruit.”

Petraeus and Marine Corps Gen. James N. Mat­tis, who suc­ceed­ed him in August as com­man­der of U.S. Cen­tral Com­mand, joint­ly over­saw the manual’s devel­op­ment and pub­li­ca­tion. Petraeus has issued fur­ther coun­terin­sur­gency guid­ance on troop oper­a­tions and con­tract­ing since assum­ing the ISAF com­mand in July 2010.

There have been set­backs as well as suc­cess­es, the gen­er­al said, but over the last year coali­tion and Afghan forces have halt­ed the Taliban’s momen­tum in much of the coun­try, and reversed the insur­gent hold in cen­tral Hel­mand province, dis­tricts around Kan­da­har city and in the secu­ri­ty bub­ble in and around the Afghan cap­i­tal of Kab­ul.

While ISAF and Afghan forces have increased their hold in many pop­u­la­tion cen­ters, there is still a tough fight for con­trol of the coun­try, he said.

“We always say it gets hard­er before it gets eas­i­er, and we have def­i­nite­ly been in the ‘get­ting hard­er’ phase of this over­all endeav­or,” the gen­er­al not­ed.

The num­ber of ene­my attacks between last May and this May was about the same, he said, and lev­els in June decreased by 3 to 5 per­cent from last year. That trend may not con­tin­ue, but is still note­wor­thy for those two months, Petraeus said, par­tic­u­lar­ly since the increase in vio­lent inci­dents from 2009 to 2010 was “very, very sig­nif­i­cant.”

“But this is hard,” he said. “There is a resilient ene­my, and there is no ques­tion … that ene­my is will­ing to cause civil­ian casu­al­ties. It’s an ene­my will­ing to blow him­self up, in some cas­es, to achieve objec­tives.”

Ene­my activ­i­ty with­in Afghanistan’s bor­der area with Pak­istan is a very seri­ous chal­lenge, the gen­er­al said.

Petraeus said ISAF and Afghan forces have worked togeth­er to estab­lish a lay­ered bor­der defense in key loca­tions such as the area between Khost province and North Waziris­tan. The pro­tec­tion force there “is quite effec­tive and well sup­port­ed,” he added.

Coali­tion troops plan to expand that force and estab­lish sim­i­lar defens­es in Pak­ti­ka province and oth­er “rugged, moun­tain­ous trib­al areas in which the insur­gents have been able to estab­lish safe havens over the years,” he said.

“Many of these areas, frankly, are just not those in which you will ever see size­able Afghan or ISAF forces,” he acknowl­edged.

With moun­tains reach­ing to 14,000 feet and sparse pop­u­la­tion, he said, the bor­der area requires sus­tain­able secu­ri­ty solu­tions that will deny insur­gents access to the Afghan side of the bor­der. The chal­lenge then, he said, will be to “work with our Pak­istani part­ners so that they can do the same on the oth­er side.”

“Keep in mind, many of these insur­gents are pos­ing what we believe is the most exis­ten­tial threat to Pak­istan,” Petraeus said. “[They] pose the most urgent threat to the very exis­tence of the Pak­istani state, as its cit­i­zens know it, … killing dozens of Pak­istani civil­ians in an aver­age week.”

In con­trast, and in keep­ing with the coalition’s empha­sis on min­i­miz­ing civil­ian casu­al­ties, he said, coali­tion spe­cial oper­a­tions activ­i­ties gen­er­al­ly result in no shots fired.

“They have been very effec­tive, indeed, in get­ting those indi­vid­u­als we’re seek­ing,” he said. “Typ­i­cal­ly cap­tur­ing them, because we want to inter­ro­gate them and … learn more about their net­works.”

The hier­ar­chy of Afghan secu­ri­ty forces is capa­ble “with some caveats,” the gen­er­al said.

“The Afghan spe­cial oper­a­tions forces, over 12,000 of them now, [are] real­ly quite capa­ble and indeed lead­ing near­ly a quar­ter of the so-called night raids at this point,” he said. “We cer­tain­ly pro­vide enablers for them … but they are the ones going through the door, they’re the ones doing the appre­hen­sions, the search­es, and all the rest of that.”

The Afghan reg­u­lar army forces are “gen­er­al­ly doing well,” he said. “Cer­tain­ly there’s a range of them,” he added, “all the way from still being estab­lished … to an actu­al inde­pen­dent infantry bat­tal­ion.”

The Afghan police forces, he said, “run the gamut from quite good to some that are sus­pect in the eyes of the local pop­u­la­tion.”

Petraeus said that dur­ing the attack on the Inter­con­ti­nen­tal Hotel in Kab­ul on June 28, Afghan forces respond­ed capa­bly and rel­a­tive­ly quick­ly in a sit­u­a­tion involv­ing a mas­sive struc­ture with hun­dreds of rooms, two huge wings and mul­ti­ple floors.

“It does take a few hours to alert a force, assem­ble it, issue its equip­ment, devel­op ini­tial plans, deploy to the loca­tion, get an update and then launch into oper­a­tions,” he said, “keep­ing in mind that the indi­vid­u­als they were going after, each of them, was wear­ing a sui­cide vest and heav­i­ly armed.”

Afghan forces accom­plished a “cred­i­ble and coura­geous per­for­mance” clear­ing the hotel of heav­i­ly armed attack­ers in sui­cide vests, he said.

NATO forces assist­ed dur­ing the attack, Petraeus said. “But it was the Afghan forces that died in this oper­a­tion,” he added. “There’s no bet­ter exam­ple … that they were the ones con­fronting these would-be sui­cide bombers, and ulti­mate­ly forc­ing the remain­ing hand­ful that remained up on to the roof, where they were killed by … oth­er forces.”

Petraeus will turn over com­mand July 18. Marine Corps Lt. Gen. John R. Allen has been nom­i­nat­ed for pro­mo­tion to gen­er­al and appoint­ment as Petraeus’ suc­ces­sor.

Petraeus will retire from the Army on Aug. 31 and assume his new duties as CIA direc­tor Sept. 6.

Petraeus told NATO TV he nev­er expect­ed to end his mil­i­tary career in Afghanistan.

“I thought I would end it as the com­man­der of U.S. Cen­tral Com­mand,” he said. “This was unex­pect­ed. … We’ve jok­ing­ly said that I went to the White House for the month­ly Nation­al Secu­ri­ty Coun­cil meet­ing on Afghanistan and Pak­istan with Pres­i­dent [Barack] Oba­ma, and came out with a new job.”

Serv­ing as NATO ISAF com­man­der was “an extra­or­di­nary priv­i­lege,” Petraeus said.

“There’s no greater hon­or, there’s also no greater respon­si­bil­i­ty, than that of com­mand,” he said. “I’ve had prob­a­bly more than my share of com­mands, espe­cial­ly as a gen­er­al offi­cer, and espe­cial­ly in some pret­ty impor­tant endeav­ors in com­bat.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →