Panetta Details NATO Successes, Challenges

BRUSSELS, Oct. 5, 2011 — As it nears the end of a suc­cess­ful cam­paign in Libya and delib­er­ate­ly accom­plish­es shared goals in Afghanistan, NATO faces sev­er­al dif­fi­cult chal­lenges, Defense Sec­re­tary Leon E. Panet­ta said here today.

The sec­re­tary addressed a gath­er­ing host­ed by the Carnegie Europe Cen­ter, part of the Carnegie Endow­ment for Inter­na­tion­al Peace.

“The inter­na­tion­al secu­ri­ty envi­ron­ment is com­plex, and it’s rapid­ly chang­ing. Our nations are grap­pling with sig­nif­i­cant bud­get chal­lenges, putting new pres­sure on defense spend­ing that has already been in decline here on this con­ti­nent,” Panet­ta said.

“But that can­not be an excuse for walk­ing away from our nation­al secu­ri­ty respon­si­bil­i­ties,” he added. “This fis­cal envi­ron­ment means that the Unit­ed States and all nations in NATO must depend on their fel­low mem­bers even more to share the bur­den of pro­tect­ing com­mon inter­ests.”

To do so, he said, requires a strong alliance whose mem­bers must address grow­ing gaps in mil­i­tary capa­bil­i­ties despite fis­cal aus­ter­i­ty.

Panet­ta not­ed that for­mer Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates used his last pol­i­cy address here to deliv­er a strong mes­sage to Europe about the need to boost its com­mit­ment to defense and to more equi­tably share the secu­ri­ty bur­den with the Unit­ed States. NATO Sec­re­tary Gen­er­al Anders Fogh Ras­mussen, he added, has warned that Europe risks becom­ing weak and divid­ed if it does not invest in its own secu­ri­ty.

“We do not have to choose between fis­cal secu­ri­ty and nation­al secu­ri­ty,” Panet­ta said. “But achiev­ing that goal will test the very future of lead­er­ship through­out NATO.”

Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma has called NATO the most suc­cess­ful alliance in human his­to­ry, Panet­ta said. “We depend on it every day to pro­vide capac­i­ty that we can­not find any­place else,” he added.

Oper­a­tion Uni­fied Pro­tec­tor, now wind­ing down in Libya, is the lat­est exam­ple of NATO’s impor­tance, the sec­re­tary said. Because of the quick action of 28 nations, he told the audi­ence, the alliance has giv­en that nation “a real chance at a bet­ter and more pros­per­ous future free from the tyran­ny of the Gad­hafi regime.”

The mis­sion had greater lead­er­ship from Europe and achieved more bur­den-shar­ing between the Unit­ed States and Europe than in the past, Panet­ta said. “After the Unit­ed States employed its unique assets in the first week of the con­flict to destroy key regime mil­i­tary tar­gets and air defense capa­bil­i­ties,” he added, “Euro­peans took on the brunt of oper­a­tions.”

France and the Unit­ed King­dom engaged on a large scale, fly­ing one-third of the over­all sor­ties and attack­ing 40 per­cent of the tar­gets, and they exer­cised lead­er­ship roles polit­i­cal­ly and diplo­mat­i­cal­ly, Panet­ta said. Cana­da was a sub­stan­tial con­trib­u­tor, he not­ed, Italy con­tributed to the air-ground mis­sion and Den­mark, Nor­way and Bel­gium togeth­er destroyed as many tar­gets as France. Roma­nia and Bul­gar­ia deployed ships as part of the Libyan arms embar­go, the sec­re­tary added.

“This was tru­ly a col­lec­tive action,” Panet­ta said, “not only among NATO allies, but with non-NATO part­ners like Qatar, the [Unit­ed Arab Emi­rates] and Swe­den.”

The oper­a­tion demon­strat­ed the alliance’s effec­tive inte­grat­ed com­mand struc­ture and the con­trib­u­tors’ abil­i­ty to work effec­tive­ly and com­mu­ni­cate with each oth­er quick­ly in a com­plex mis­sion, he said.

NATO is very sim­ply the only alliance that is capa­ble of exe­cut­ing this kind of respon­si­bil­i­ty,” Panet­ta said.

The largest effort and a focus of NATO talks among the alliance’s defense min­is­ters here this week is the war in Afghanistan, the sec­re­tary added, where non-NATO allies and part­ners con­tribute close to 40,000 troops to the mis­sion.

As the Unit­ed States begins draw­ing down its forces there, the sec­re­tary said, “[we] will make sure that … we do not deprive our NATO part­ners of the crit­i­cal enablers and sup­port their troops depend on.”

The alliance must con­tin­ue “to send a strong sig­nal to the peo­ple of Afghanistan and the Tal­iban that we are com­mit­ted to the long-term secu­ri­ty of their coun­try,” Panet­ta added.

But NATO suc­cess­es also illus­trate grow­ing gaps in alliance capa­bil­i­ties, he said.

In Libya, the sec­re­tary said, NATO had sig­nif­i­cant short­ages of well-trained tar­get­ing spe­cial­ists, sup­plies and muni­tions, aer­i­al refu­el­ing tankers, and intel­li­gence, sur­veil­lance and recon­nais­sance plat­forms such as Glob­al Hawk and Preda­tor drones. With­out such capa­bil­i­ties, pro­vid­ed by the Unit­ed States, said he added, “the Libya oper­a­tion would not have got­ten off the ground or been sus­tained.”

In Afghanistan, Marine Corps Gen. John R. Allen, com­man­der of the Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Force, still lacks train­ers and con­tin­ues to seek con­tri­bu­tions to trust funds estab­lished to sus­tain the Afghan nation­al secu­ri­ty forces. As in Libya, Panet­ta said, the short­age of ISR capa­bil­i­ties and enablers, espe­cial­ly air­lift, has plagued the mis­sion since the begin­ning.

“These capa­bil­i­ty gaps are being exposed at pre­cise­ly the time when every defense min­is­ter in NATO, includ­ing myself, is deal­ing with great fis­cal chal­lenges at home,” the sec­re­tary added. “There are legit­i­mate ques­tions about whether, if present trends con­tin­ue, NATO will again be able to sus­tain the kind of oper­a­tions we have seen in Libya and Afghanistan with­out the Unit­ed States tak­ing on even more of a bur­den.”

The Defense Depart­ment already is required to reduce spend­ing by $450 bil­lion over the next 10 years, and that total could jump to $1 tril­lion if Con­gress fails to address larg­er deficit issues this year, he said.

“Rec­og­niz­ing the finan­cial and polit­i­cal real­i­ties we face, … we need at a min­i­mum to coor­di­nate addi­tion­al cuts, avoid sur­pris­es and ensure that our lim­it­ed resources are being put into the most effi­cient and effec­tive defense pro­grams,” Panet­ta said.

Going for­ward, he added, NATO must fun­da­men­tal­ly review how the alliance orga­nizes itself to fight, iden­ti­fy and pro­tect the core alliance mil­i­tary capa­bil­i­ties it needs to meet the next decade’s chal­lenges.

Before May’s NATO sum­mit in Chica­go, Panet­ta said, the alliance should look for inno­v­a­tive ways to enhance part­ner­ships with coun­tries out­side NATO that are excep­tion­al­ly capa­ble mil­i­tar­i­ly and those that strive to be more capa­ble.

“We live in a world of grow­ing dan­ger and grow­ing uncer­tain­ty where we face threats from vio­lent extrem­ism, from nuclear pro­lif­er­a­tion, from ris­ing pow­ers and from cyber attack,” the sec­re­tary said. “We can­not pre­dict where the next cri­sis will occur, but we know we are stronger when we con­front these threats togeth­er.”

In con­fronting the bud­get chal­lenges he faces at home, Panet­ta said, he will make the tough deci­sions need­ed to avoid hol­low­ing out the U.S. mil­i­tary. NATO, he added, must send a strong sig­nal of its deter­mi­na­tion not to hol­low out the alliance, but to keep it strong and vital.

“It has been a tough decade of war, but our alliance has emerged stronger,” the sec­re­tary said. “Just as we met the chal­lenges of the Cold War and 9/11,“I am con­fi­dent we can con­front the chal­lenges that await us in the next decade.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →