Officials Emphasize Commitment to Joint Strike Fighter

WASHINGTON, May 9, 2012 — Senior lead­ers from the Air Force and Navy affirmed yes­ter­day that the F‑35 joint strike fight­er remains the cen­ter­piece of the tac­ti­cal air­craft pro­gram and will play a large part in the ser­vices’ ongo­ing mod­ern­iza­tion plans.

Navy Vice Adm. David J. Ven­let, F‑35 Light­ning II pro­gram exec­u­tive offi­cer, told the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Committee’s air­land sub­com­mit­tee that the F‑35’s basic engine designs were deemed sound and deliv­er­able after a bat­tery of tests and obser­va­tions over the past year.

“While there is still risk in the pro­gram, it is risk-bal­anced,” Ven­let said. “I have con­fi­dence in the resilience of the plan to absorb fur­ther learn­ing dis­cov­ery and stay on track.”

Still, Ven­let said, the pro­gram will “not exe­cute itself,” and will require resources, tools and process­es to enable dis­ci­plined deci­sions on devel­op­ment and incre­men­tal capa­bil­i­ty deliv­ery.

Tech­ni­cal and cost issues exist, the admi­ral acknowl­edged, but he added that the joint strike fighter’s enhanced capa­bil­i­ty can be the back­bone of fifth-gen­er­a­tion fight­ers.

Car­ri­er test pilots con­duct­ing approach­es at Patux­ent Riv­er, Md., have laud­ed the han­dling char­ac­ter­is­tics of the F‑35’s air­craft car­ri­er vari­ant, he said, and short take­off and ver­ti­cal land­ing results have demon­strat­ed sol­id per­for­mance.

“It is a tes­ti­mo­ny to the very effec­tive and impres­sive mar­riage of engine and air­frame,” Ven­let said, adding that mea­sures will stay in place to ensure the program’s long-term effec­tive­ness. “Rig­or­ous man­age­ment con­trol by the joint pro­gram office, sup­port­ed by the ser­vice sys­tem com­mands, will be applied with a … focus on pro­duc­tion and afford­able deliv­ery capa­bil­i­ty — our only mean­ing­ful exter­nal result.”

Navy Vice Adm. W. Mark Skin­ner, prin­ci­pal mil­i­tary deputy in the office of the assis­tant sec­re­tary of the Navy for research, devel­op­ment and acqui­si­tion, said afford­abil­i­ty will be a key focus in deliv­er­ing capa­bil­i­ties.

“Dur­ing these aus­tere times, we must per­sist in mod­ern­iz­ing and recap­i­tal­iz­ing our naval avi­a­tion forces and increase our capa­bil­i­ty through force mul­ti­pli­ers, such as the Navy Inte­grat­ed Fire Con­trol Counter-Air and using ’should-cost/will-cost’ process­es to bring more afford­able sys­tems to our warfight­ers,” Skin­ner said.

Lt. Gen. Janet C. Wolfen­barg­er, assis­tant sec­re­tary of the Air Force for acqui­si­tion, told the pan­el the fis­cal 2013 bud­get aligns with the Air Force’s tac­ti­cal avi­a­tion pro­gram as the ser­vice shifts its nation­al secu­ri­ty strat­e­gy to counter mod­ern-day threats.

“Our rapid­ly aging air­craft fleet dri­ves the urgent need to bal­ance pro­cure­ment of new inven­to­ry with sus­tain­ment of our cur­rent fleet,” Wolfen­barg­er said.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →