New Law Identifies No Additional Defense Cuts, Official Says

WASHINGTON, Aug. 3, 2011 — The leg­is­la­tion Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma signed into law yes­ter­day to raise the nation’s debt ceil­ing and con­trol long-term spend­ing does not specif­i­cal­ly call for more spend­ing cuts than Defense Depart­ment offi­cials already were plan­ning, a senior Pen­ta­gon offi­cial said today.

The pres­i­dent asked depart­ment offi­cials ear­li­er this year to find $400 bil­lion in sav­ings, and Pen­ta­gon offi­cials have been work­ing to iden­ti­fy that amount over the next 10 or so years, offi­cials have said. “That is hard to do, but man­age­able,” a senior depart­ment offi­cial told reporters dur­ing a back­ground brief­ing today. All Pen­ta­gon-relat­ed spend­ing cuts would come from the department’s base bud­get, and not from its over­seas oper­at­ing fund, which sup­plies oper­a­tions in Afghanistan, Iraq and oth­er for­eign loca­tions, the offi­cial said. 

Deci­sions about the spend­ing cuts are not made arbi­trar­i­ly, he said. “As we work to accom­mo­date these changes in the defense bud­get, we do so with pol­i­cy and strat­e­gy in mind,” he explained. 

The new law rais­es the government’s bor­row­ing abil­i­ty by $2.1 tril­lion, which offi­cials said would elim­i­nate the need for fur­ther debt ceil­ing increas­es until 2013. 

In its effort to curb spend­ing, the law caps dis­cre­tionary spend­ing for all fed­er­al depart­ments for 10 years in an effort to save more than $900 bil­lion. A White House fact sheet released yes­ter­day esti­mates the Defense Department’s share of that goal at $350 bil­lion, which the Pen­ta­gon offi­cial said is inclu­sive of the $400 bil­lion fig­ure offi­cials already were work­ing on. He acknowl­edged, how­ev­er, that “there are a lot of num­bers float­ing around.” 

In a mes­sage to the Defense Depart­ment work­force today, Defense Sec­re­tary Leon E. Panet­ta said the esti­mat­ed reduc­tions in defense spend­ing asso­ci­at­ed with the law are in line with what DOD offi­cials have been plan­ning. “I believe we can imple­ment these reduc­tions while main­tain­ing the excel­lence of the mil­i­tary,” he said. 

The law, how­ev­er, also cre­ates a bipar­ti­san com­mit­tee of Con­gress mem­bers charged with iden­ti­fy­ing an addi­tion­al $1.5 tril­lion in bud­get sav­ings by Nov. 23. While there is no way to know what the com­mit­tee will rec­om­mend, the Pen­ta­gon offi­cial said in today’s back­ground brief­ing, “I would hope they will not make fur­ther cuts in defense, because we’ve done a lot already.” 

The offi­cial said he assumes the com­mit­tee will focus on find­ing sav­ings in enti­tle­ment spend­ing, such as a Med­ic­aid and Medicare, and through tax rev­enue. “Large, addi­tion­al cuts would be a prob­lem for us, as far as our nation­al defense,” he said. 

An “unac­cept­able” sce­nario for the depart­ment, the offi­cial said, is if Con­gress fails to act on the committee’s rec­om­men­da­tions by the law’s dead­line of Dec. 23. If that hap­pens, an auto­mat­ic across-gov­ern­ment spend­ing cut of $1.2 tril­lion over 10 years will go into effect. 

Even with exemp­tions for vet­er­an, mil­i­tary and civil­ian pay, he said, the process known as “seques­tra­tion” like­ly would cut an addi­tion­al $50 bil­lion to $60 bil­lion more per year from the defense bud­get, lead­ing to fur­loughs, lay­offs and dis­rup­tions of programs. 

But the offi­cial empha­sized that the Pen­ta­gon is not plan­ning for such an event. “I don’t think that will hap­pen,” he said. “The whole point is for that not to happen.” 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →