USA — Army improving helicopter protective measures

WASHINGTON (Army News Ser­vice, Aug. 19, 2010) — The Army is now craft­ing an inte­grat­ed approach to air­craft sur­viv­abil­i­ty that com­bines input from mul­ti­ple on-board sen­sors and uses that infor­ma­tion to detect, track and defeat incom­ing ene­my fire.

 -
Spc. Kevin Welsh pro­vides secu­ri­ty before board­ing a CH-47 Chi­nook heli­copter after com­plet­ing a mis­sion in Chak val­ley in the War­dak province of Afghanistan on Aug. 3, 2010. Welsh is assigned to Delta Com­pa­ny, 1st Bat­tal­ion, 503rd Infantry Reg­i­ment, 173rd Air­borne Brigade Com­bat Team.
Pho­to cred­it Sgt. Rus­sell Gilchrest
Click to enlarge

By com­bin­ing input from a vari­ety of dif­fer­ent sur­viv­abil­i­ty sys­tems now on-board rotary air­craft into a sin­gle sys­tem and dis­play screen, the Army can stream­line threat infor­ma­tion deliv­ery and at the same time reduce the size, weight and pow­er require­ments for its air­craft, said Col. John Leaphart, project man­ag­er for air­craft sur­viv­abil­i­ty equip­ment.

“Right now we have mul­ti­ple prod­uct lines — three or four dif­fer­ent sys­tems that do dif­fer­ent things,” said Leaphart. “We need to move toward a more inte­grat­ed approach, which in the future means a suite of sen­sors and a suite of coun­ter­mea­sures that are con­trolled by a com­mon proces­sor that runs all of them in a holis­tic fash­ion.”

Leaphart said such a sys­tem would save devel­op­ment and pro­cure­ment dol­lars. But more impor­tant­ly, he said, a com­bined sys­tem would weigh less than mul­ti­ple sys­tems, which reduced air­craft weight. Such a sys­tem would also con­sume less pow­er on the air­craft.

The Army is now work­ing on com­put­er algo­rithms able to com­bine input from a range of dif­fer­ent air­craft tech­nolo­gies includ­ing CMWS and var­i­ous now-in-devel­op­ment tech­nolo­gies, such as the Hos­tile Fire Detec­tion Sys­tem and the Com­mon Infrared Coun­ter­mea­sure sys­tem.

The CIRCM sys­tem is an improved, lighter-weight ver­sion of Advanced Threat Infrared Coun­ter­mea­sures — a high-tech laser jam­mer that is able to thwart guid­ed-mis­sile attacks on heli­copters by using an infrared sen­sor designed to track an approach­ing mis­sile. The sys­tem fires a multi­band heat laser to inter­cept the mis­sile and throw it off course, Leaphart explained.

“Right now pilots are look­ing at mul­ti­ple dis­plays and we need to get to a com­mon dis­play,” he said. “We are work­ing on wrap­ping the acqui­si­tion strat­e­gy around this so that we achieve a grad­ual migra­tion toward a more inte­grat­ed approach.”

A key exam­ple of this move toward inte­gra­tion is a new effort called the Hos­tile Fire Detec­tion Sys­tem. The HFDS com­bines ultra­vi­o­let and acoustic sen­so­ry input to thwart small arms fire.

“One of the big things we are fac­ing right now in the­ater is small arms fire, so we are look­ing at devel­op­ing this HFDS. We are get­ting ready to pro­duce a quick reac­tion capa­bil­i­ty that involves a piece of soft­ware that will go into the proces­sor for CMWS and give it the abil­i­ty to detect trac­er fire and oth­er threats,” Leaphart said.

HFDS works off of the UV sen­sor in the CMWS sys­tems and adds an algo­rithm into the process which enables it to dif­fer­en­ti­ate trac­er fire from a mis­sile launch.

“This is bring­ing a new capa­bil­i­ty into an exist­ing sys­tem which makes that sys­tem more effec­tive against a broad­er spec­trum of threats,” he explained.

The next step is to con­nect the UV sen­sor to an acoustic sen­sor so as to bet­ter detect mul­ti­ple sources of incom­ing fire.

The CMWS has already proven itself in com­bat.

“The CMWS does reduce the imme­di­ate reac­tion work­load of respond­ing to a mis­sile threat,” said Chief War­rant Offi­cer Pat Shores, Avi­a­tion Branch Tac­ti­cal Oper­a­tions Offi­cer; Direc­torate of Train­ing and Doc­trine, U.S. Army Avi­a­tion Cen­ter of Excel­lence. “This also enables the crew to react faster to destroy­ing the threat on the ground.”

Shores said he thinks America’s ene­mies find out too late just how effec­tive sys­tem like CMWS actu­al­ly are.

“Shoot­ing a mis­sile at Army air­craft is a lose-lose sit­u­a­tion for them,” Shores said. “They have an extreme­ly low prob­a­bil­i­ty of a hit, and due to the CMWS and sim­i­lar sys­tems, they also have a high prob­a­bil­i­ty being detect­ed and destroyed after the shot.”

The CIRCM pro­gram, planned as a mul­ti-ser­vice sur­viv­abil­i­ty solu­tion for rotary-wing air­craft, aims to improve on and cap­ture lessons learned from the now-field­ed ATIRCM tech­nol­o­gy. CIRCM is prepar­ing to enter a com­pet­i­tive devel­op­ment pro­to­typ­ing phase, Leaphart said.

A for­mal request for pro­pos­al for CIRCM is planned for release by the fourth quar­ter of this year.

“The acqui­si­tion strat­e­gy is we will do a tech-devel­op­ment phase with mul­ti­ple com­pa­nies in com­pe­ti­tion with each oth­er. They will devel­op two pro­to­types that will be eval­u­at­ed dur­ing this phase. For engi­neer­ing devel­op­ment, a mar­ket sur­vey will be con­duct­ed and if war­rant­ed, a lim­it­ed com­pe­ti­tion between these two ven­dors will occur for EMD with a man­u­fac­tur­ing phase for one of those,” Leaphart said.

ATIRCM is field­ed now on heli­copters over Iraq and Afghanistan. CIRCM, its replace­ment, low­ers the weight of the sys­tem and there­fore brings with it the oppor­tu­ni­ty to deploy this kind of laser counter-mea­sure across a wider por­tion of the fleet.

“This will give the rotary wing fleet the capa­bil­i­ty to defeat IR mis­siles that they don’t have right now. CIRCM has a laser emit­ter as part of the tur­ret — guid­ed by an IR point­er. This points the laser on the IR seek­er of the inbound mis­sile. Shoot­ing the laser into the IR seek­er essen­tial­ly blinds the mis­sile,” Leaphart explained.

Test­ing and devel­op­ment of CIRCM will take place at a vari­ety of loca­tions, to include Red­stone Arse­nal, Ala., and Eglin AFB, Fla. Pro­duc­tion is slat­ed to begin by 2015.

(Kris Osborn writes for the Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of the Army (Acqui­si­tion, Logis­tics and Tech­nol­o­gy.))

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →