NATO — Stavridis Expands on NATO Strategic Concept’s Aims

WASHINGTON, May 20, 2010 — The new NATO strate­gic con­cept looks to build on the alliance’s obvi­ous strengths, the alliance’s supreme allied com­man­der for Europe said yes­ter­day.
Navy Adm. James G. Stavridis said NATO is look­ing at a com­pre­hen­sive approach to secu­ri­ty for the future. 

“I would argue that the future of secu­ri­ty in this 21st cen­tu­ry is not an on-and-off switch between hard pow­er and soft pow­er, between com­bat and peace,” he said dur­ing a pre­sen­ta­tion at the Atlantic Coun­cil here. “It’s a rheo­stat — you’ve got to dial it in.” 

The imag­i­nary rheo­stat runs from pure hard pow­er to pure soft pow­er, he said, and while the alliance remains mil­i­tar­i­ly capa­ble, more often than not, secu­ri­ty will need ele­ments of both hard and soft power. 

Stavridis talked about the new­ly released strate­gic con­cept drawn up by a broad­ly based group of experts. For­mer U.S. Sec­re­tary of State Madeleine K. Albright chaired the group, and she intro­duced Stavridis at the Atlantic Coun­cil. Albright said her work was a start­ing point for dis­cus­sion on a strate­gic con­cept that NATO lead­ers are expect­ed to approve at the alliance’s sum­mit in Lis­bon, Por­tu­gal, in November. 

Peo­ple who say NATO is an out­dat­ed rel­ic have not looked at its his­to­ry or its present, and have not tried to look at its future, the admi­ral said. “When we talk of this alliance, we need to rec­og­nize the wealth of it, the reach of it, the pow­er of it,” he said. “No nation has ever attacked a NATO nation, and no NATO nation has ever attacked anoth­er NATO nation.” 

Stavridis likened the alliance to a bridge between North Amer­i­ca and Europe that bridges cul­tures and is a bridge in time. “It bridges the Cold War past to the present, and leads us in to the 21st cen­tu­ry,” he said. 

It also is a large alliance, now con­tain­ing 28 mem­ber states and more part­ners. This cre­ates a chal­leng­ing envi­ron­ment to get deci­sions made, but it is doable, the admi­ral said. “We have 130,000 sol­diers, sailors, air­men and marines on mis­sions on three con­ti­nents,” the admi­ral said. “Those are hard deci­sions, but they’ve all been made at [the NATO] table among 28 dif­fer­ent states. I main­tain we’ve done a good job of get­ting 28 [nations] together.” 

The alliance also makes good use of the cul­tur­al, lin­guis­tic, mil­i­tary, eco­nom­ic and polit­i­cal strengths of 28 nations, Stavridis added. 

Alliance lead­ers need to focus on a com­pre­hen­sive approach, Stavridis said, and NATO has learned much from its expe­ri­ences in Afghanistan. 

“Fun­da­men­tal to suc­ceed­ing there is the idea of a com­pre­hen­sive approach – com­bin­ing mil­i­tary and civil­ian orga­ni­za­tions as one,” he said, adding that civil­ian gov­ern­ment agen­cies, the Unit­ed Nations, the World Bank, var­i­ous gov­ern­ment aid orga­ni­za­tions and pri­vate-sec­tor enti­ties all will have to work togeth­er to suc­ceed in Afghanistan. NATO needs to under­stand this, he said, and devise ways to include these enti­ties in plan­ning and execution. 

The new strate­gic con­cept also calls for increased engage­ment with Rus­sia, and Stavridis acknowl­edged that two views of Rus­sia exist with­in the alliance. On one side are coun­tries that still wor­ry about aggres­sion or intim­i­da­tion from Rus­sia, while anoth­er set of coun­tries wants to engage with the nation, he explained. 

“We must reas­sure one set of allies and we must con­tin­ue to find a dia­logue and find zones of coop­er­a­tion with Rus­sia,” the admi­ral said. Poten­tial areas of coop­er­a­tion include arms con­trol, coun­ter­pira­cy, coun­tert­er­ror­ism, mis­sile defense and Afghanistan, he added. The con­cept also calls for NATO to devel­op cyber­se­cu­ri­ty defenses. 

“We need to come to grips about what is a cyber attack,” he said. “We need cen­ters that can focus on it. We need pro­ce­dures to pro­vide defen­sive means in this world of cyber.” Com­bat­ing ter­ror­ism is not the pri­ma­ry mis­sion of the alliance, the admi­ral said, but he not­ed that more than 400 ter­ror attacks took place in Europe in 2009. “It’s not a direct mis­sion for the mil­i­tary or for NATO,” he said, but there are sup­port func­tions we can provide.” 

Inter­na­tion­al pira­cy is a lab­o­ra­to­ry for coop­er­a­tion in the 21st cen­tu­ry, Satvridis said, not­ing that the Euro­pean Union is the lead agency address­ing pira­cy off the coast of Africa. “That’s fine,” he said. “NATO is there with a com­ple­men­tary oper­a­tion. The EU has the lead, and I see that as a com­fort­able sit­u­a­tion. NATO does not always have to be the lead agency in every secu­ri­ty dimension.” 

The long-range bal­lis­tic mis­sile threat already is real and will get worse in the years ahead, Stavridis said. Iran­ian mis­siles can reach some of Europe’s cap­i­tals, he said, and this chal­lenge requires mis­sile defense. 

“The Unit­ed States is mov­ing for­ward with a phased, adap­tive approach,” he said. “Much of the dis­cus­sion before the Lis­bon sum­mit will be how NATO wants to be a part of that.” NATO also needs to do a bet­ter job of com­mu­ni­cat­ing what the alliance is and why it still is impor­tant to a new gen­er­a­tion, the admi­ral said. 

“We’re very good at launch­ing mis­siles,” he told the group. We need to get bet­ter at launch­ing ideas.” 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →