NATO Incorporates Afghan Ways into Training

WASHINGTON, Sept. 8, 2011 — As NATO’s Train­ing Mis­sion Afghanistan works to build the country’s army, air force, and police, it is doing so with an empha­sis on being “Afghan cen­tric,” the mission’s deputy com­man­der said.

U.S. Army Maj. Gen. Peter Fuller dis­cussed NATO’s mis­sion to train a self-suf­fi­cient Afghan mil­i­tary and police force yes­ter­day on a DoDLive Blog­gers’ Round­table.

The gen­er­al said it is unre­al­is­tic to think a few years of train­ing will cre­ate a mil­i­tary “on par with our own,” and an Afghan mil­i­tary won’t have the same require­ments as the U.S. mil­i­tary. He said he tries to focus on what an Afghan army, air force or police force might need.

“The three words I use around here a lot are, we’re try­ing to be Afghan-right, we’re try­ing to be Afghan-first, and now, we’re try­ing to be Afghan-like,” Fuller said.

For exam­ple, he explained, the U.S. Army has mobile kitchens they can set up until a con­trac­tor can get on-site to pro­vide food for the troops. But the Afghan army tends to be more local­ized, he said, and does­n’t need a lot of expe­di­tionary capa­bil­i­ty.

Build­ing infra­struc­ture also has shown the Afghan mil­i­tary to have dif­fer­ing require­ments. West­ern build­ing stan­dards dic­tate cer­tain ameni­ties, includ­ing air con­di­tion­ing, propane-equipped kitchens and West­ern-style toi­lets. Afghans have dif­fer­ent “neces­si­ties.”

Bath­rooms at U.S. instal­la­tions in Afghanistan had porce­lain sinks � a west­ern stan­dard. “But the Afghans like to wash their feet before they do prayers,” Fuller said. “So they were try­ing to perch on the edge of a porce­lain sink, and it did­n’t work out very well. So, now we’ve changed it to Afghan-right.”

Doing what’s right for Afghanistan can come through busi­ness part­ner­ships, too. NTM‑A is work­ing with Afghan-owned and oper­at­ed com­pa­nies to build a sus­tain­able mil­i­tary sup­port indus­try, the gen­er­al said.

The 352,000 mem­bers of the Afghan Nation­al Secu­ri­ty force need boots, uni­forms and oth­er equip­ment, Fuller said, and there’s no rea­son to import them.

“We’re hav­ing an Afghan com­pa­ny — or actu­al­ly, sev­er­al Afghan com­pa­nies — make the uni­forms, make the boots, make all the equip­ment items that they need,” he said. “Now we’re get­ting a much low­er price because the price we had to pay for in the Unit­ed States was one that had a ship­ping cost asso­ci­at­ed with it.”

Fuller said he wants NTM‑A to leave Afghanistan with a capa­ble, sus­tain­able secu­ri­ty force, and a mar­ket for local­ly pro­duced equip­ment to help their econ­o­my grow and devel­op.

“We’re try­ing to do sev­er­al things … : build what’s appro­pri­ate for Afghanistan, use Afghanistan com­pa­nies as much as pos­si­ble, and then ensure that as they estab­lish stan­dards for account­abil­i­ty and stew­ard­ship, that they fol­low them,” Fuller said.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →