Iraq — Soldier in Iraq Faces Criminal Charges

From a U.S. Divi­sion Cen­ter News Release BAGHDAD, July 6, 2010 — Crim­i­nal charges under the Uni­form Code of Mil­i­tary Jus­tice were pre­ferred yes­ter­day against a sol­dier assigned to the 10th Moun­tain Division’s 2nd Brigade Com­bat Team at Con­tin­gency Oper­at­ing Sta­tion Ham­mer, Iraq, mil­i­tary offi­cials report­ed today.

Two charges con­sist­ing of 12 spec­i­fi­ca­tions were pre­ferred against Army Pfc. Bradley E. Man­ning, 22. 

The first charge, under Arti­cle 92 of the UCMJ, is for vio­lat­ing a law­ful Army reg­u­la­tion by trans­fer­ring clas­si­fied data onto his per­son­al com­put­er and adding unau­tho­rized soft­ware to a clas­si­fied com­put­er system. 

The sec­ond charge includes eight spec­i­fi­ca­tions under Arti­cle 134 of the UCMJ, incor­po­rat­ing vio­la­tions of the U.S. Crim­i­nal Code: 

— One spec­i­fi­ca­tion of vio­lat­ing U.S. Code Title 18, Sec­tion 793, for com­mu­ni­cat­ing, trans­mit­ting and deliv­er­ing nation­al defense infor­ma­tion to an unau­tho­rized source; 

— Three spec­i­fi­ca­tions of vio­lat­ing U.S. Code Title 18, Sec­tion 1030(a)(1), for dis­clos­ing clas­si­fied infor­ma­tion con­cern­ing the nation­al defense with rea­son to believe that the infor­ma­tion could cause injury to the Unit­ed States; and 

— Four spec­i­fi­ca­tions of vio­lat­ing Unit­ed States Code Title 18, Sec­tion 1030(a)(2), for exceed­ing autho­rized com­put­er access to obtain clas­si­fied infor­ma­tion from a U.S. depart­ment or agency. 

All of the charges relate to inci­dents that occurred between Novem­ber 2009 and May 2010, and the crim­i­nal inves­ti­ga­tion remains open, offi­cials said. 

Offi­cials empha­sized that pre­fer­ral of charges rep­re­sents an accu­sa­tion only, and that Man­ning is pre­sumed inno­cent until and unless he’s proven guilty. The case will be processed in accor­dance with nor­mal pro­ce­dures, offi­cials added. 

The com­mand will appoint an offi­cer to pre­side over an Arti­cle 32 inves­ti­ga­tion, which is sim­i­lar to a civil­ian grand jury hear­ing. The inves­ti­gat­ing offi­cer will make find­ings and rec­om­men­da­tions that the chain of com­mand con­sid­ers in deter­min­ing whether to refer the case to tri­al by court-martial. 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →