Intelligence Chief Says al-Qaida Still Greatest Threat

WASHINGTON, Feb. 11, 2011 — Ter­ror­ism –- specif­i­cal­ly al-Qai­da -– remains the great­est threat to the Unit­ed States, the direc­tor of nation­al intel­li­gence said on Capi­tol Hill, yes­ter­day.
“Coun­tert­er­ror­ism is our top pri­or­i­ty, because Job One for the intel­li­gence com­mu­ni­ty, mind you, is to keep Amer­i­cans safe and the home­land secure,” James R. Clap­per Jr. told the House Select Com­mit­tee on Intel­li­gence. “The intel­li­gence com­mu­ni­ty has helped thwart many poten­tial­ly dev­as­tat­ing attacks.”

The Unit­ed States has made progress against the orga­ni­za­tion that car­ried out the Sept. 11, 2001, ter­ror­ist attacks on the Unit­ed States, Clap­per said. “We’ve appre­hend­ed numer­ous dan­ger­ous actors through­out the world and weak­ened much of al-Qaida’s core capa­bil­i­ties,” he added, “includ­ing its oper­a­tions, train­ing and its pro­pa­gan­da.”

U.S. intel­li­gence agen­cies work close­ly with for­eign part­ners to detect and pre­vent ter­ror­ist actions, and all remain vig­i­lant, the intel­li­gence direc­tor told the com­mit­tee mem­bers. But although al-Qaida’s capa­bil­i­ties have been degrad­ed, he said, the orga­ni­za­tion still can launch attacks.

“We’re espe­cial­ly focused on al-Qaida’s resolve to tar­get Amer­i­cans for recruit­ment and to spawn affil­i­ate groups around the world,” the direc­tor said. “We also see dis­turb­ing instances of self-rad­i­cal­iza­tion among our own cit­i­zens.”

In 2010, intel­li­gence experts dis­rupt­ed plots and pro­vid­ed infor­ma­tion that led to the arrest of home­grown vio­lent extrem­ists, Clap­per said. The num­bers of Amer­i­can ter­ror­ists is small, he added, but he not­ed that they have dis­pro­por­tion­ate impact because “they under­stand our home­land, have con­nec­tions here, and have eas­i­er access to U.S. facil­i­ties.” Coun­tert­er­ror­ism is cen­tral to the intel­li­gence community’s over­seas oper­a­tions, notably in Afghanistan, Clap­per said. Although there has been great work against al-Qai­da in Afghanistan, he told the House pan­el, there is no ques­tion that the peo­ple of Afghanistan are up against a deter­mined insur­gency.

“There’s trou­bling attri­tion with­in [Afghanistan’s] secu­ri­ty forces, and cor­rup­tion -– includ­ing extor­tion, land seizures and drug traf­fick­ing –- feed the insur­gency,” he said. Mean­while, Pak­istan has made real progress in con­fronting al-Qai­da and its allies, Clap­per added.

The intel­li­gence com­mu­ni­ty also is con­cerned about the pro­lif­er­a­tion of weapons of mass destruc­tion, Clap­per said.

“The pro­lif­er­a­tion threat envi­ron­ment is a flu­id, bor­der­less are­na that reflects the broad­er glob­al real­i­ty of an increas­ing­ly free move­ment of peo­ple, goods and infor­ma­tion,” the direc­tor said. “While this envi­ron­ment is crit­i­cal for peace­ful sci­en­tif­ic and eco­nom­ic advances, it also allows the mate­ri­als, tech­nolo­gies and know-how relat­ed to chem­i­cal, bio­log­i­cal, radi­o­log­i­cal and nuclear weapons, as well as mis­sile deliv­ery sys­tems, to be shared with ease and speed.”

Iran is the key chal­lenge, Clap­per said, as it con­tin­ues to push for nuclear mate­ri­als and capa­bil­i­ties, and pro­lif­er­ates mis­sile tech­nol­o­gy.

“In the months fol­low­ing the 2009 Iran­ian elec­tions, we saw a pop­u­lar move­ment chal­lenge the author­i­ty of its gov­ern­ment,” Clap­per said. “We also saw the Iran­ian gov­ern­ment crack down with harsh­er author­i­tar­i­an con­trol. We see a dis­turb­ing con­flu­ence of events: an Iran that is increas­ing­ly rigid, auto­crat­ic, depen­dent on coer­cion to main­tain con­trol, and defi­ant towards the West, and an Iran that con­tin­ues to advance its ura­ni­um-enrich­ment capa­bil­i­ties — along with what appears to be the sci­en­tif­ic, tech­ni­cal and indus­tri­al capac­i­ty to pro­duce nuclear weapons if its lead­ers choose to do so.”

North Kore­an nuclear weapons and mis­sile pro­grams also pose a seri­ous threat, both region­al­ly and beyond, Clap­per said. “Pyongyang has sig­naled a will­ing­ness to re-engage in dia­logue, but it also craves inter­na­tion­al recog­ni­tion as a nuclear-weapons pow­er,” he told the pan­el.

Events in Tunisia, Egypt, Yemen and oth­er coun­tries demon­strate the real­i­ty that in an inter­con­nect­ed, inter­de­pen­dent world, insta­bil­i­ty can arise and spread quick­ly beyond bor­ders, he said, not­ing ten­sions and insta­bil­i­ty intel­li­gence pro­fes­sion­als have report­ed in the Mid­dle East and North Africa. “Spe­cif­ic trig­gers for how and when insta­bil­i­ty would lead to the col­lapse of var­i­ous regimes can­not always be known or pre­dict­ed,” Clap­per said.

The intel­li­gence direc­tor stressed that intel­li­gence can reduce uncer­tain­ty for deci­sion mak­ers, but can’t elim­i­nate it. “We are not clair­voy­ant,” he said.

The intel­li­gence com­mu­ni­ty has pro­vid­ed crit­i­cal intel­li­gence through­out the cri­sis in North Africa and has been report­ing on unrest, demo­graph­ic changes, eco­nom­ic uncer­tain­ty and the lack of polit­i­cal expres­sion for these frus­tra­tions for decades, Clap­per said. “Eco­nom­ic chal­lenges have become para­mount and can­not be under­es­ti­mat­ed — from increas­ing debt to fluc­tu­at­ing growth, to China’s eco­nom­ic and mil­i­tary rise,” he said.

The intel­li­gence com­mu­ni­ty is extreme­ly focused on cyber threats, Clap­per said, and their poten­tial effects on nation­al secu­ri­ty and eco­nom­ic pros­per­i­ty.

“This threat is increas­ing in scope and scale, and its impact is dif­fi­cult to over­state,” the direc­tor said. “Indus­try esti­mates the pro­duc­tion of mali­cious soft­ware has reached its high­est lev­el yet, with an aver­age of 60,000 new pro­grams or vari­a­tions iden­ti­fied each day. Some of these are what we define as advanced per­sis­tent threats, which are dif­fi­cult to detect and counter.”

Amer­i­ca faces a wide range of for­eign intel­li­gence threats to eco­nom­ic, polit­i­cal and mil­i­tary inter­ests at home and abroad, Clap­per said, not­ing that unau­tho­rized dis­clo­sures of sen­si­tive and clas­si­fied U.S. gov­ern­ment infor­ma­tion pose sub­stan­tial chal­lenges.

“Per­haps the most bla­tant exam­ple, of course, is the unau­tho­rized down­load­ing of clas­si­fied doc­u­ments sub­se­quent­ly released by Wik­iLeaks,” he said. “From an intel­li­gence per­spec­tive, these dis­clo­sures have clear­ly been very dam­ag­ing.”

An inter­con­nect­ed intel­li­gence team is con­fronting the threats of an inter­con­nect­ed world, Clap­per told the pan­el.

“The intel­li­gence com­mu­ni­ty is bet­ter able to under­stand the vast array of inter­lock­ing con­cerns and trends, antic­i­pate devel­op­ments to stay ahead of adver­saries pre­cise­ly because we oper­ate as an inte­grat­ed com­mu­ni­ty,” he said.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →