Historian Captures Evolving Story in Iraq

WASHINGTON — With a front-row seat to the his­to­ry unfold­ing in Iraq, Army Lt. Col. Les’ Mel­nyk is cap­tur­ing it all for pos­ter­i­ty, so the Amer­i­can pub­lic knows the full sto­ry behind what hap­pened there, and the mil­i­tary can learn from its expe­ri­ences.

Army Lt. Col. Les' Melnyk, official historian for U.S. Forces Iraq, is capturing details about U.S. military operations under way in Iraq to support a comprehensive history about Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation New Dawn. Courtesy photo
Army Lt. Col. Les’ Mel­nyk, offi­cial his­to­ri­an for U.S. Forces Iraq, is cap­tur­ing details about U.S. mil­i­tary oper­a­tions under way in Iraq to sup­port a com­pre­hen­sive his­to­ry about Oper­a­tion Iraqi Free­dom and Oper­a­tion New Dawn.
Cour­tesy pho­to
Click to enlarge

Mel­nyk, a Nation­al Guards­man with a Ph.D. in his­to­ry from the City Uni­ver­si­ty of New York, serves as offi­cial his­to­ri­an for U.S. Forces Iraq.

Since deploy­ing in late May, he has chron­i­cled sev­er­al major his­tor­i­cal devel­op­ments in Iraq, includ­ing the offi­cial end of the U.S. com­bat mis­sion, the tran­si­tion of oper­a­tions to State Depart­ment con­trol, and the draw­down of U.S. forces to just under 50,000 troops.

Mel­nyk also played wit­ness to the lead­er­ship changes at USFI, with Army Gen. Ray­mond T. Odier­no pass­ing com­mand to Army Gen. Lloyd J. Austin III as Oper­a­tion Iraqi Free­dom offi­cial­ly end­ed and Oper­a­tion New Dawn was born.

Through­out these events, Mel­nyk works like a sponge, absorb­ing details about the USFI oper­a­tions and how they fit into the broad­er strate­gic plan. Tape recorder and note­book in hand, he’s a reg­u­lar at a long line of brief­in­gs, from Austin’s com­man­ders’ updates four morn­ings each week, to low­er-lev­el staff ses­sions where the details of day-to-day oper­a­tions get ham­mered out.

Unless specif­i­cal­ly asked to put an issue at hand into a his­tor­i­cal con­text, Mel­nyk is a silent observ­er, the prover­bial fly on the wall.

“That’s the whole point,” he said. “I’m not there to influ­ence events. I’m there as an observ­er. The most impor­tant thing for me is to take notes on what the [com­mand­ing gen­er­al] and the oth­er senior lead­ers say and what their reac­tions are.

“It’s not just about doc­u­ment­ing facts, but also about what the CG says to the staff,” Mel­nyk con­tin­ued. “What are his pri­or­i­ties? What are his con­cerns? What does he find encour­ag­ing or in some cas­es, dis­cour­ag­ing, about what is going on?”

Mel­nyk remains in a col­lec­tion mode between brief­in­gs, inter­view­ing the USFI staff to gain insights and sit­u­a­tion­al aware­ness, as he exam­ines deci­sion papers and oth­er key doc­u­ments.

Unlike jour­nal­ists, always fight­ing the clock to meet the next dead­line, Mel­nyk has the lux­u­ry of reflec­tion. His focus isn’t on what hap­pened today — just how it fits into the broad­er pic­ture of what’s hap­pen­ing in Iraq.

“I don’t have to pro­duce a prod­uct on a dai­ly basis, so I have more time to digest it all,” he said. “I also have the [secu­ri­ty] clear­ance and access and wear the uni­form, so I have the under­stand­ing that comes with hav­ing been in uni­form for 22 years that enables me to put it all into con­text that a reporter does­n’t have. I have a bet­ter under­stand­ing of how a large head­quar­ters con­ducts oper­a­tions and how the mil­i­tary does things.”

Mel­nyk con­sol­i­dates the huge vol­ume of infor­ma­tion he gath­ers into a sin­gle report each quar­ter. His first report, which cov­ered April, May and June, was 88 pages long and includ­ed almost 300 foot­notes refer­ring to doc­u­ments and inter­views he had col­lect­ed.

He con­sid­ers this a rough draft to sup­port the big­ger sto­ry of U.S. mil­i­tary oper­a­tions in Iraq — one future his­to­ri­ans will write down the road, after the mis­sion is com­plete and doc­u­ments relat­ed to it are declas­si­fied.

Those his­to­ri­ans, with the advan­tage of 20–20 hind­sight as they tell the sto­ry of the U.S. mil­i­tary mis­sion in Iraq, will rely heav­i­ly on the on-the-ground accounts and doc­u­men­ta­tion that Mel­nyk and oth­er mil­i­tary his­to­ri­ans who have pre­ced­ed him in Iraq have been amass­ing since 2003.

They’re all con­tained on a mas­sive share dri­ve housed with­in USFI, and shared with Melnyk’s three cus­tomers: the Army Cen­ter for Mil­i­tary His­to­ry, the U.S. Cen­tral Command’s his­to­ri­an and the Joint His­to­ry Office at the Pen­ta­gon.

As he goes about his work dur­ing his first expe­ri­ence as a deployed his­to­ri­an, Mel­nyk said he’s impressed by the recep­tion he has received. “Almost every­where, you run into peo­ple here who think his­to­ry is cool,” he said. “They each bring their per­son­al, and in many cas­es, fam­i­ly his­to­ry to the table, and they are fas­ci­nat­ed by the his­to­ry of the mil­i­tary they serve in.”

That appre­ci­a­tion isn’t new to the mil­i­tary. In a memo to his staff in Novem­ber 1947, then-Army Chief of Staff Gen. Dwight D. Eisen­how­er empha­sized the impor­tance of Army his­to­ri­ans as they chron­i­cled the his­to­ry of World War II.

“The Army pos­sess­es no inher­ent right to con­ceal the his­to­ry of its affairs behind a cloak of secu­ri­ty, nor is such con­duct con­ducive to a sound and healthy approach to the per­for­mance of its duties,” Eisen­how­er wrote.

“The his­tor­i­cal record of the Army’s oper­a­tions as well as the man­ner in which these were accom­plished, are pub­lic prop­er­ty,” he con­tin­ued. “Beyond this, the major achieve­ments with which the Army is cred­it­ed are, in fact, the accom­plish­ments of the entire nation.”

Mel­nyk keeps Eisenhower’s memo by his desk at the USFI head­quar­ters at Camp Vic­to­ry in Bagh­dad to guide his work today.

“Part of the rea­son we care about the his­to­ry is what Eisen­how­er said: the pub­lic has a right to know,” he said. “The pub­lic has made a big invest­ment in lives and peo­ple and its trea­sury, and has a right to know about what our mil­i­tary forces have done.”

But tomorrow’s mil­i­tary stands to gain from that sto­ry as well, he said. “You want to have this his­to­ry avail­able for lessons learned, to teach what we did, what worked and what did­n’t work, and about the unique com­plex­i­ty of Iraq,” Mel­nyk said.

“Future gen­er­a­tions will want to know what we did here so that they can learn from it.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →