Canada — Major-General Jon Vance on the cost of Canadian Forces Operations

State­ment made by Major-Gen­er­al Jon Vance on the cost of Cana­di­an Forces Oper­a­tions — Op Mobile Tech­ni­cal Brief­ing of May 11th, 2012.

 -
Here you can find more infor­ma­tion about:

Good after­noon.
Thank you for join­ing us this after­noon.
My name is Major Gen­er­al Jon Vance. I am the Direc­tor of Staff of the Strate­gic Joint Staff.

I am here today to pro­vide you with some con­text sur­round­ing how the Depart­ment man­ages and reports costs of our oper­a­tional mis­sions, specif­i­cal­ly OP MOBILE – Canada’s con­tri­bu­tion to pro­tect­ing Libyan civil­ians last year.

In gen­er­al terms, before the Depart­ment under­takes any con­tin­gency oper­a­tion — regard­less of size, scope or dura­tion — a detailed cost esti­mate is pre­pared.

This includes prepar­ing a finan­cial cost esti­mate of the antic­i­pat­ed incre­men­tal costs to DND for the con­duct of the mis­sion. Such cost esti­mates are required so that Senior Lead­er­ship and the Gov­ern­ment are aware of the poten­tial cost and impact of a mis­sion and there­fore can make informed deci­sions regard­ing the stew­ard­ship of resources.

As plan­ning for a new mis­sion matures, and as the oper­a­tional sce­nario becomes clear­er, the cost esti­mate is updat­ed. It is pru­dent to re-cost the mis­sion when the con­cept of oper­a­tions changes or the oper­a­tional tem­po changes by a sig­nif­i­cant amount.

As you are all no doubt well aware, plan­ning only takes you so far. As the oper­a­tion itself unfolds, the require­ments — and thus the costs — change. We adapt to those cir­cum­stances and adjust the plans and the esti­mates as need­ed..

With respect to the costs of Op Mobile, Canada’s mis­sion in Libya, I can state with com­plete con­fi­dence that the Depart­ment has been utter­ly trans­par­ent with Cana­di­ans, mem­bers of the media and Par­lia­ment as to the costs of the mis­sion as it evolved.

We pro­vid­ed reg­u­lar updates to Cana­di­ans and Par­lia­ment about mis­sion costs as the oper­a­tion unfold­ed.

This includ­ed costs of the mis­sion to date, as well as esti­mates of future incre­men­tal costs.

The Min­is­ter respond­ed to ques­tions in the House of Com­mons.

Senior offi­cers and offi­cials pro­vid­ed this infor­ma­tion in appear­ances before Par­lia­men­tary com­mit­tees.

And the Depart­ment respond­ed to ques­tions from the media.

When report­ing costs of mis­sions — as was the case in Afghanistan — the Depart­ment of Nation­al Defence uses incre­men­tal costs.

Incre­men­tal cost is the cost for per­son­nel and equip­ment that would not have been incurred if there was no CF oper­a­tion.

Specif­i­cal­ly, incre­men­tal cost includes the addi­tion­al cost to deploy troops and equip­ment, pro­vide ongo­ing main­te­nance and sup­port dur­ing the applic­a­ble oper­a­tion and any oper­a­tion spe­cif­ic train­ing required for the oper­a­tion.

As of Jan­u­ary 31st 2012, the total incre­men­tal expen­di­tures incurred for OP MOBILE are esti­mat­ed to be $103.6 mil­lion. This fig­ure includes costs for:

  • Allowances for per­son­nel deployed ($7.4 mil­lion);
  • Accom­mo­da­tions, food and trans­porta­tion ($38.4 mil­lion);
  • Ship oper­at­ing costs: fuel, spare parts, port fees, garbage col­lec­tion ($16.8 mil­lion);
  • Ammu­ni­tion con­sumed ($34.6 mil­lion);
  • Rental of vehi­cles ($3.0 mil­lion); and
  • Satel­lite com­mu­ni­ca­tion ($3.4 mil­lion)

Recent reports have sug­gest­ed that the cost of Op MOBILE as report­ed pub­licly in our Report on Plans and Pri­or­i­ties has increased to $350 mil­lion with­out the knowl­edge of those respon­si­ble for the fis­cal man­age­ment of Defence.

This is wrong.

As I men­tioned ear­li­er, the incre­men­tal cost of Op MOBILE was $103.6 mil­lion. This is the for­mal record of addi­tion­al expense to DND and Cana­di­ans for con­duct­ing the mis­sion. All oth­er fig­ures, includ­ing the “full cost” fig­ure of $347.5M include mon­ey that would have been spent whether the mis­sion was per­formed or not. This includes costs of salaries, depre­ci­a­tion of equip­ment, com­mand and con­trol and so on. Full costs were report­ed in the RPP as is our respon­si­bil­i­ty.

Bot­tom Line: $63M esti­mat­ed from Mar 11 to Sep 11; $106M esti­mat­ed from Sep to Dec11. Actu­al incre­men­tal costs for the oper­a­tion: $103.6M (we came in under esti­mates). Full costs, prop­er­ly report­ed in the RPP: $347.5M. All state­ments made that updat­ed the pub­lic while the oper­a­tions were ongo­ing or as expens­es were being incurred were accu­rate to the day they were updat­ed and as reflect­ed in the actu­al expens­es ver­sus esti­mates.

In con­clu­sion, I trust that the above infor­ma­tion pro­vides both you as mem­bers of the media and Cana­di­ans with a more com­plete pic­ture of the costs of our mis­sion in Libya.

I also want to reas­sure Cana­di­ans that the Depart­ment has been trans­par­ent with Cana­di­ans in how it esti­mates, funds and reports mis­sion costs.

Source:
Depart­ment of Nation­al Defence, Cana­da

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →