USA — Army eyes industry for energy efficiency alliances

DETROIT (Army News Ser­vice) — To meet ener­gy ini­tia­tives, cut costs, and to help bet­ter pro­tect Sol­diers, the Army is look­ing to indus­try for solu­tions and part­ner­ships.

Army's Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center
While vis­it­ing the Army’s Tank Auto­mo­tive Research, Devel­op­ment and Engi­neer­ing Cen­ter, Aug. 26, Sen. Carl Levin of Michi­gan, left, and Under Sec­re­tary of the Army Joseph W. West­phal, cen­ter, met with Steve Knott, of TARDEC’s ground sys­tems sur­viv­abil­i­ty divi­sion. Knott explained to the sen­a­tor and the sec­re­tary new advances in lighter armor for Army com­bat vehi­cles. Dur­ing the Aug. 26–27 vis­it to Detroit, West­phal
Pho­to Cred­it: C. Todd Lopez.
Click to enlarge

Under Sec­re­tary of the Army Joseph W. West­phal trav­eled to Detroit Aug. 26 to vis­it the Army’s Tank Auto­mo­tive Research, Devel­op­ment and Engi­neer­ing Cen­ter, along with automak­ers Gen­er­al Motors and Ford. 

The secretary’s vis­it to the Michi­gan sites came at the request of U.S. Sen. Carl Levin, the state’s senior sen­a­tor and chair­man of the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Committee. 

“He had a great inter­est in me learn­ing more about what TARDEC does and its con­nec­tion to the auto indus­try and its con­nec­tion to the Depart­ment of Ener­gy,” said West­phal, of Levin. “My goal was to come here and see it with him and get a broad­er per­spec­tive of their work, their mis­sion and those relationships.” 

Out­side the Gen­er­al Motors Tech­ni­cal Cen­ter in War­ren Michi­gan, West­phal and Levin test-drove a Chevro­let Volt — a plug-in hybrid elec­tric vehi­cle. Fol­low­ing the dri­ve, the two vis­it­ed with GM exec­u­tives at the cen­ter to dis­cuss the Army’s efforts toward ener­gy effi­cien­cy, and what Gen­er­al Motors is doing in that area that could be done in part­ner­ship with the military. 

West­phal and Levin then trav­eled to the near­by TARDEC facil­i­ty to see how Army researchers are devel­op­ing tech­nolo­gies relat­ed to both Sol­dier safe­ty and fuel econ­o­my — two things West­phal said are impor­tant to the Army. 

“What I’d like to see us make the most progress in would be to first of all do what­ev­er we need to do to con­tin­ue to max­i­mize pro­tec­tion for Sol­diers in the bat­tle­field,” he said. “We are doing every­thing we can in that respect with all of our vehi­cles that we are using in the fight. And sec­ond­ly — to the extent that we can max­i­mize ener­gy sav­ings — have less depen­den­cy on petro­le­um prod­ucts and fos­sil fuels, both in com­bat and at home.” 

Dur­ing his vis­its to GM, TARDEC and Ford, the sec­re­tary said he saw evi­dence of that. 

“I think we saw evi­dence that there are a lot of poten­tial tech­nolo­gies and infra­struc­ture we can use,” he said. “Some will require upfront invest­ment — that’s more cost­ly — we have to make those deci­sions to do that.” 

While at TARDEC, the sec­re­tary saw tech­nol­o­gy relat­ed to fuel effi­cien­cy, Sol­dier safe­ty, and devel­op­ment of bat­tery tech­nol­o­gy that would allow Sol­diers and equip­ment to yield more pow­er at less weight. 

Sonya Zanardel­li, an elec­tri­cal engi­neer and the ener­gy stor­age team leader at TARDEC, was one of those West­phal and Levin met at TARDEC. She is part of a team now look­ing at bet­ter alter­na­tives to the lead-acid bat­ter­ies now in 95 per­cent of Army vehicles. 

One goal, she said, is to increase the “silent watch” time pos­si­ble for Army com­bat vehicles. 

“What that means is on the vehi­cles you can pow­er all of your elec­tron­ics with your main engine off and have some­thing called ‘true silent watch’ — engine off and pow­er every­thing with a bat­tery,” she said. 

For Sol­diers, that means the abil­i­ty to con­duct oper­a­tions in silence, in the dark, vir­tu­al­ly unde­tect­ed, for as long as pos­si­ble. That length of time is lim­it­ed now by the dura­tion of lead-acid batteries. 

Zanardel­li said bat­tery chem­istry can deter­mine the length of time equip­ment can oper­ate. A lithi­um-ion bat­tery, for instance, has an ener­gy den­si­ty three times that of a lead-acid battery. 

“You can pow­er your mis­sion equip­ment much longer,” with a lithi­um-ion bat­tery, she said. Impor­tant also is “ener­gy den­si­ty” — that’s the amount of ener­gy a bat­tery can pro­vide com­pared to the weight of the battery. 

“We’re look­ing for high-ener­gy den­si­ty bat­ter­ies, high-pow­er bat­ter­ies, so the Sol­dier can car­ry his load and not have to change bat­ter­ies as often,” she said. That also means that Sol­diers would have less weight to carry. 

Zanardel­li said one chal­lenge with lithi­um-ion bat­ter­ies, how­ev­er, is that they are sub­ject to “ther­mal run­away.” That’s a con­di­tion where the bat­ter­ies over­heat due to the chem­i­cal reac­tions inside them. That con­di­tion can be man­aged by bat­tery man­age­ment sys­tems that con­trol ener­gy use and mon­i­tor temperature. 

“One of the chal­lenges is how to mit­i­gate ther­mal run­away and how to devel­op a smarter more intel­li­gent bat­tery man­age­ment sys­tem,” she said. “If the bat­tery man­age­ment sys­tem fails, the bat­tery shuts down.” 

Steve Knott, with TARDEC’s ground sys­tems sur­viv­abil­i­ty divi­sion, also met with the sec­re­tary and sen­a­tor. He dis­cussed tech­nolo­gies being devel­oped now that pro­vide lighter pro­tec­tion for com­bat vehi­cles, yet still pro­vide the right kind of pro­tec­tion for Soldiers. 

“Prob­a­bly the most impor­tant things are the light­weight armors — the light­weight ceram­ic-com­pos­ite armors,” he said. “Tra­di­tion­al armors have been steels, alu­minum, vari­a­tions of steels that cause the round to break up and to tum­ble. The weight of those mate­ri­als are caus­ing bur­dens to the vehi­cle — specif­i­cal­ly in weight and size.” 

Some of those tech­nolo­gies involve ceram­ics, and car­bon-fiber prod­ucts that pro­vide the same pro­tec­tion as steel armor, but at a much lighter weight. That means that Sol­diers stay safe, but that the vehi­cles the armor pro­tects can car­ry more pay­load: more peo­ple, more sup­plies, or more weapons. 

“We have this awe­some task of bal­anc­ing per­for­mance, pay­load and pro­tec­tion,” he said. “You want to ensure you get the best pro­tec­tion with­out eat­ing up pay­load or performance.” 

Recent devel­op­ments in armor for vehi­cles, Knott said, have result­ed in sig­nif­i­cant weight reduc­tions for Army com­bat vehicles. 

“I think it’s safe to say we are reduc­ing today’s armors com­pared to steel — we can stop the same kind of round in about half the weight,” he said. “Today, the state-of-the-art is ceram­ics, com­pos­ites, and dif­fer­ent met­al matrix com­pos­ites. And as we get far­ther out, I think there are oppor­tu­ni­ties to exploit elec­tro­mag­net­ic and dif­fer­ent types of defeat mechanisms.” 

West­phal said he was impressed with the work he saw at TARDEC, and said that he sees progress being made toward Army goals of bet­ter ener­gy effi­cien­cy and Sol­dier safety. 

“The work that’s being done here is pret­ty essen­tial to not only the cur­rent mis­sions but pret­ty essen­tial to how we mod­ern­ize the Army and how best we move this equip­ping of the Army for­ward into the future,” he said. 

The sec­re­tary also said he was unaware as to the scope and depth of research being done at the Army’s War­ren, Mich., research facility. 

“I did­n’t real­ize they were focused on so many aspects of the fleet and look­ing at every­thing from ener­gy, to struc­ture and mobil­i­ty and so forth,” he said. “I was very pleased to see the scope and breadth and com­pre­hen­sive nature of their work.” 

Final­ly, the sec­re­tary said he was pleased with the abil­i­ty to talk direct­ly with auto man­u­fac­tur­ers to dis­cuss Army needs and desires and to strike up rela­tion­ships with them to move the Army for­ward with its goals. 

“See­ing that for the first time, after going through that peri­od where the car­mak­ers were going through tremen­dous eco­nom­ic cri­sis and all that tur­moil in the indus­try and see­ing where they have come from and what they are doing now and how they are look­ing at the future — that was pret­ty excit­ing,” he said. 

Still, West­phal said, build­ing mean­ing­ful part­ner­ships with the auto indus­try may prove chal­leng­ing. He said the part­ner­ships between indus­try, the Army and TARDEC will require more atten­tion in the very near future if the Army is going to accom­plish the things it wants to accomplish. 

“I think it will require greater open­ness by us, to engage with the pri­vate sec­tor and acad­e­mia,” he said. “And I would say the same thing about them. They will need to be a lit­tle more flex­i­ble and open in deal­ing with the mil­i­tary and the gov­ern­ment and the rules we work under.” 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twitter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →