Africa Command Makes Steady Progress, Ward Says

WASHINGTON, Feb. 22, 2011 — U.S. Africa Com­mand has made steady, under­stat­ed progress with allies, region­al orga­ni­za­tions and inter­na­tion­al part­ners on the con­ti­nent, Army Gen. William E. “Kip” Ward, Africom’s com­man­der, said in an inter­view last week.
Ward, who took the reins as the first com­man­der of America’s newest geo­graph­ic com­mand in 2007, will turn over com­mand to Army Gen. Carter F. Ham next month.

Africom con­ducts sus­tained secu­ri­ty engage­ment through mil­i­tary-to-mil­i­tary pro­grams, mil­i­tary spon­sored activ­i­ties and oth­er mil­i­tary oper­a­tions. The command’s aim is to pro­mote a sta­ble and secure envi­ron­ment in sup­port of U.S. for­eign pol­i­cy.

The goals are to help region­al allies build secu­ri­ty orga­ni­za­tions that per­form pro­fes­sion­al­ly and with integri­ty, and that have the will and means to direct, dis­suade, deter and defeat transna­tion­al threats. The com­mand also works to strength­en capa­bil­i­ties to sup­port con­ti­nen­tal and inter­na­tion­al peace efforts.

Estab­lish­ing the com­mand was an uphill bat­tle, Ward said. Crit­ics in the Unit­ed States assumed it marked anoth­er step in the “mil­i­ta­riza­tion” of U.S. for­eign pol­i­cy, he explained, and some on the con­ti­nent saw the com­mand as a new colo­nial­ist effort.

“Many thought that the com­mand would be the con­duit through which all activ­i­ty of the U.S. gov­ern­ment, con­ti­nen­twide, would pass,” Ward said. “It was nev­er the case, but that was the impres­sion, and since it was a brand-new com­mand, there was no basis for com­par­i­son.”

Until Africom stood up, three U.S. com­mands had respon­si­bil­i­ty for the con­ti­nent –- U.S. Euro­pean Com­mand, U.S. Cen­tral Com­mand and U.S. Pacif­ic Com­mand. Africa Com­mand was to com­bine the mis­sions those com­mands were doing in Africa in a uni­fied and thought­ful pur­pose.

“Still, the way things were said in the ear­ly days lent them­selves to mis­in­ter­pre­ta­tions” by crit­ics, the gen­er­al said.

Allay­ing the con­cerns of crit­ics in the Unit­ed States and, espe­cial­ly, on the con­ti­nent were the first mis­sions Ward set for the com­mand.

“I set out with a staff of folks to cor­rect the mes­sage,” he said. “Just say­ing we’re not going to be in charge of devel­op­ment was­n’t enough. We will be sup­port­ive of gov­er­nance and devel­op­ment, but we weren’t going to run the pro­grams. We repeat­ed that mes­sage to our friends, and it became what they heard from me, from my deputies, my direc­tors and from our senior enlist­ed lead­ers.”

That mes­sage, he added, was fol­lowed up by how the com­mand con­duct­ed itself. Mem­bers of the com­mand lis­tened more than they spoke –- in Africa and with inter­a­gency part­ners, he said. Soon, the gen­er­al added, all could see that the com­mand was not mil­i­ta­riz­ing for­eign pol­i­cy, but fur­ther­ing State Depart­ment or U.S. Agency for Inter­na­tion­al Devel­op­ment pro­grams.

“Seen through the lens of the for­eign pol­i­cy per­spec­tive, we weren’t lead­ing -– we were, in fact, sup­port­ing the efforts of oth­er U.S. gov­ern­ment agen­cies,” Ward said.

Sus­tain­ing engage­ment in Africa was one rea­son the new com­mand was formed. The three com­mands that had respon­si­bil­i­ty before had oth­er mat­ters to address, Ward explained, their atten­tion to the world’s sec­ond-largest con­ti­nent ebbed and flowed. Now that has changed, he said.

“[Lead­ers] know our focus is always on the con­ti­nent of Africa and nowhere else,” the gen­er­al said. “It is a huge fac­tor, and they under­stood that we did care about them and we were pri­or­i­tiz­ing our work to con­cen­trate on what con­cerned them.”

African allies have accept­ed the com­mand, “and more impor­tant­ly, it is effec­tive on the con­ti­nent,” he said. Africa has many ungoverned or under-gov­erned areas, includ­ing Soma­lia, Dar­fur, Sudan and oth­ers. Africom cov­ers 53 of the 54 nations on the con­ti­nent — Egypt remained in the U.S. Cen­tral Com­mand area of oper­a­tions — and the com­mand is work­ing with many to facil­i­tate peace­keep­ing oper­a­tions and human­i­tar­i­an relief oper­a­tions.

The command’s activ­i­ty is focused on three lev­els: coun­try-to-coun­try, region­al and con­ti­nen­tal, Ward said. Africom works with indi­vid­ual coun­tries to build secu­ri­ty capa­bil­i­ties and with region­al orga­ni­za­tions to strength­en African respons­es. Final­ly, it works with con­ti­nen­twide groups.

“One of our pri­or­i­ty objec­tives is to work with these region­al eco­nom­ic com­mu­ni­ties and their stand-by forces as best we can,” the gen­er­al said. “We also know that work­ing through these orga­ni­za­tions is ter­ri­bly impor­tant.”

The com­mand has worked with the Eco­nom­ic Com­mu­ni­ty of West Africa States, the East African Com­mu­ni­ty and the South­ern African Devel­op­ment Com­mu­ni­ty. “As they mature and as they ask for our sup­port,” Ward said, “we pro­vide it and encour­age them in that region­al approach.”

At the con­ti­nen­tal lev­el, the com­mand works with the African Union. “The first trip I made to the con­ti­nent when we stood up the com­mand was to [the Ethiopi­an cap­i­tal of] Addis Aba­ba, to the African Union head­quar­ters, to rein­force our sup­port to the Africans’ con­ti­nen­tal orga­ni­za­tion,” the gen­er­al said.

These capa­bil­i­ties have grown, Ward said, adding that he is pleased at the will­ing­ness of these region­al orga­ni­za­tions to work togeth­er.

“We see nations who are now part­ner­ing who 10 years ago were ene­mies,” he said. “I give them the cred­it. They have made the deci­sion. We are there to rein­force this and pro­vide the sup­port they ask for.”

The Inter­na­tion­al Mil­i­tary Edu­ca­tion and Train­ing pro­gram prob­a­bly is Africom’s sin­gle most impor­tant tool, Ward said.

“I’ve been going to Con­gress and the Depart­ment of State, say­ing we ought to be doing all we can to rein­force and to enlarge and enhance our IMET pro­gram,” Ward said. “That is the long-term div­i­dend in our engage­ment — when offi­cers, [non­com­mis­sioned offi­cers,] and war­rant offi­cers from our part­ner nations can come to the Unit­ed States, sit side by side with our men and women, and in addi­tion to learn­ing about the art of mil­i­tary sci­ence, also under­stand Amer­i­cans as humans, the things we val­ue, the role of a mil­i­tary in a democ­ra­cy.” The Unit­ed States has seen the edu­ca­tion and train­ing pro­gram pay off in Egypt, Kenya and Cote d’Ivoire, Ward said.

“This long-term sus­tained engage­ment has caused the mil­i­tary to behave in ways that shows their neu­tral­i­ty, their impar­tial­i­ty and their role as pro­tec­tors of their peo­ple and not oppres­sors of their peo­ple,” he added.

Ward stressed that the com­mand fol­lows the for­eign pol­i­cy direc­tion of the State Depart­ment, not­ing that he con­struct­ed and staffed the com­mand to mir­ror that pri­or­i­ty.

“What we want­ed to do was have rep­re­sen­ta­tion of the inter­a­gency [rela­tion­ship] as a part of the com­mand -– not in the tra­di­tion­al sense of the inter­a­gency as mem­bers who sit off by them­selves, but inte­grat­ed mem­bers of our staff,” he said. The Africom staff includes a State Depart­ment deputy and rep­re­sen­ta­tives from U.S. Agency for Inter­na­tion­al Devel­op­ment, the Agri­cul­ture and Ener­gy depart­ments, and oth­er U.S. agen­cies.

“Their involve­ment in all our activ­i­ties clear­ly lent itself to the notion that what we were doing was off by itself, but was being informed by our for­eign pol­i­cy and the range of activ­i­ties that we were involved in -– be it State or the U.S. Agency for Inter­na­tion­al Devel­op­ment or the Agri­cul­ture Depart­ment,” he said.

The command’s inter­a­gency aspect also serves to inform the agen­cies’ head­quar­ters in Wash­ing­ton as the men and women there use their con­tacts and skills to help the com­mand, and vice ver­sa, Ward said.

“Hav­ing those inter­a­gency part­ners on our team, they could see how we were doing and were clear­ly there to help us do our plan­ning and our work,” the gen­er­al said, “but they could pro­vide that input back to their depart­ments.”

Chal­lenges exist on the con­ti­nent, Ward acknowl­edged. Soma­lia, al-Qai­da in North Africa’s Mah­greb region and, ille­gal traf­fick­ing of peo­ple and drugs and weapons through porous bor­ders are among the chal­lenges the peo­ple of the con­ti­nent must deal with, he added.

“It’s rein­forced when you have chal­lenges in devel­op­ment in infra­struc­ture and ener­gy and water, [and] when you have issues with gov­er­nance,” he said. “All these chal­lenges have to be looked at in a com­pre­hen­sive way. This means the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty also has to play. They have to work togeth­er.”

But in addi­tion to the chal­lenges, the gen­er­al said, Africa also presents vast oppor­tu­ni­ties. The con­ti­nent has seen small but steady eco­nom­ic growth, even through the down­turn in the Amer­i­can and Euro­pean economies, Ward not­ed.

“The oppor­tu­ni­ties are great,” he said. “We are see­ing more region­al coop­er­a­tion. With secure struc­tures oper­at­ing in more appro­pri­ate ways, we take advan­tage of those oppor­tu­ni­ties to rein­force suc­cess and we work as a glob­al com­mu­ni­ty on these chal­lenges.

“How we rein­force and sup­port the African Union mis­sion in Soma­lia is impor­tant,” he con­tin­ued. “How we rein­force and sup­port the work being done by region­al part­ners in East Africa is impor­tant.”

The com­mand is “mov­ing out smart­ly, and at a pace com­pa­ra­ble to oth­er geo­graph­ic com­mands,” Ward said.

“But we haven’t been at it very long,” he added. “What we have done is chart­ed a course where our work is seen as pre­ven­tive. Our work will pre­vent a cri­sis, as opposed to [hav­ing] to respond and react to one. We think that is the best result for our nation — if a cri­sis nev­er gets start­ed.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →