Afghanistan Strategy Review on Track for December

WASHINGTON, Nov. 9, 2010 — Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma should receive a report on a review of his Afghanistan pol­i­cy next month, a senior admin­is­tra­tion offi­cial said today.

Speak­ing to reporters on back­ground, the offi­cial, who is involved in the review, said the review will help to deter­mine how well the strat­e­gy is work­ing and aid in plan­ning the start of tran­si­tion­ing to Afghan con­trol of secu­ri­ty.

“By now, pat­terns devel­op, which is quite help­ful,” he said.

The annu­al review is the first since Oba­ma announced the pol­i­cy change in a Decem­ber speech at the U.S. Mil­i­tary Acad­e­my at West Point, N.Y., the offi­cial said, but he added that Oba­ma has mon­i­tored the sit­u­a­tion from the begin­ning.

“The pres­i­dent made clear he would care­ful­ly watch for progress over time, and he’s done that in the course of the last year,” he said.

Oba­ma receives week­ly writ­ten input from Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates and Sec­re­tary of State Hillary Rod­ham Clin­ton and their sub­or­di­nates in the field, the offi­cial said.

Oba­ma also takes part in a month­ly video con­fer­ence with his nation­al secu­ri­ty team and lead­ers in field, and he receives a com­pre­hen­sive set of met­rics quar­ter­ly to mea­sure progress in Afghanistan, Pak­istan, and in the coun­tert­er­ror­ism effort at large, the offi­cial added.

The pur­pose of the annu­al review, he explained, is to assess trends not obvi­ous at the more fre­quent inter­vals. The review will account for adjust­ments and revi­sions that have tak­en place dur­ing the year, such as the ini­tia­tive to bet­ter hire and train Afghan local police, efforts to rein­te­grate insur­gents into civil­ian soci­ety, Pak­istan mil­i­tary ini­tia­tives, and dev­as­tat­ing floods that Pak­istan has been deal­ing with since sum­mer, he said.

The report also will include results of NATO’s Nov. 19–20 sum­mit in Lis­bon, Por­tu­gal, where offi­cials are expect­ed to dis­cuss tran­si­tion­ing Afghan forces to take the lead on their country’s secu­ri­ty, and putting a tran­si­tion in place to imple­ment over sev­er­al years, he said. Also, the offi­cial said, he expects a theme to come out of Lis­bon that “the Afghans will not have to stand alone.”

“I think NATO will look to estab­lish and define their endur­ing com­mit­ments and part­ner­ships,” he said.

The review is designed to pro­vide an assess­ment, but not rec­om­men­da­tions, the offi­cial said. “This is a diag­nos­tic look at the strat­e­gy. It is not pre­scrip­tive,” he said. “We are not in the busi­ness of for­mu­lat­ing pol­i­cy alter­na­tives or dif­fer­ent cours­es of action.”

Oba­ma wants to know if the strat­e­gy is on the right path, and whether it’s deliv­er­ing the desired effects at the right pace.

Still, he said, pol­i­cy impli­ca­tions prob­a­bly will result in the form of ques­tions the review will raise, which will be tak­en up in the new year by the nation­al secu­ri­ty team.

The review will include input from inter­na­tion­al part­ners, as well as lead­ers on the ground, espe­cial­ly Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, com­man­der of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, the offi­cial said. “Gen­er­al Petraeus’ input is fun­da­men­tal to what we’re gath­er­ing here,” he said. “It’s a bot­tom-up dri­ven process. In that way, Gen­er­al Petraeus and his region­al com­man­ders are absolute­ly at the con­trols with their Afghanistan coun­ter­parts on what’s doable and on what time­line.”

Like the more fre­quent reviews, the annu­al review will not be made pub­lic due to the nation­al secu­ri­ty infor­ma­tion involved, but the admin­is­tra­tion will have announce­ments for Con­gress and the pub­lic prob­a­bly in late Decem­ber or ear­ly Jan­u­ary, he said.

The offi­cial would not be spe­cif­ic about what met­rics are being used to assess progress in the region, oth­er than to say it will include “com­pre­hen­sive” items for mea­sure­ment. An exam­ple, he said, would be in assess­ing secu­ri­ty by look­ing at trends in vio­lence by dis­tricts and which dis­tricts are con­trolled by the Tal­iban.

A reporter asked how the Afghanistan strat­e­gy can suc­ceed with insur­gent safe havens in Pak­istan. “This is the fun­da­men­tal under­ly­ing ques­tion that we’ve exam­ined care­ful­ly in the quar­ter­ly reviews,” the offi­cial replied. “There still are safe havens in Pak­istan. Get­ting at those safe havens is fun­da­men­tal to our approach. You’ve hit on a key item of review.”

Also, he said, “We’re see­ing some indi­ca­tors that the Tal­iban may be under pres­sure in ways it was­n’t under pres­sure before. So the ques­tion is, which dimen­sions of the cam­paign is apply­ing that pres­sure and how can we sus­tain it? This gets to the fun­da­men­tal ques­tions about the mil­i­tary cam­paign and the polit­i­cal process con­nect­ed to it.”

The offi­cial said Oba­ma is stand­ing by his plans to begin to start draw­ing down U.S. forces in Afghanistan in July. The review will help to deter­mine the pace of the draw­down, he said, although it “won’t be the defin­ing look,” because six more months will pass before then.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →