UNSC vote on Palestine State: US Credibility at Stake

Syn­op­sis
Pres­i­dent Mah­moud Abbas’ deci­sion to seek Unit­ed Nations Secu­ri­ty Coun­cil recog­ni­tion of Pales­tin­ian state­hood pos­es the most seri­ous chal­lenge to US cred­i­bil­i­ty in the Arab and Mus­lim world. It will also weak­en Israel’s strate­gic links with Turkey, its most impor­tant Mus­lim ally.

Com­men­tary

THE PALESTINE Author­i­ty is prepar­ing to con­front Israel’s main ally, the Unit­ed States, in the Unit­ed Nations Secu­ri­ty Coun­cil in a bat­tle of wills over recog­ni­tion of the Pales­tine State. This impend­ing diplo­mat­ic clash will sig­nif­i­cant­ly under­mine Washington’s abil­i­ty to pro­tect its friend and could weak­en its alliances in the Arab world.

A deci­sion by Pales­tin­ian Pres­i­dent Mah­moud Abbas to request the Secu­ri­ty Coun­cil rather than the UN Gen­er­al Assem­bly to recog­nise Pales­tin­ian state­hood is designed to force the US to make good on its pledge to veto the res­o­lu­tion. The veto will sig­nif­i­cant­ly under­mine US cred­i­bil­i­ty and call into ques­tion Pres­i­dent Barak Obama’s sup­port for the cre­ation of a Pales­tin­ian state with bor­ders based on the bound­aries of Israel pri­or to the 1967 Arab-Israeli war in which it con­quered the West Bank, the Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem.

Mr. Oba­ma has vowed to block UN recog­ni­tion of the Pales­tin­ian state in sup­port of Israel. He has argued that recog­ni­tion would not fur­ther the Pales­tin­ian quest for state­hood and has set aside warn­ings from Arab nations that the veto would affect their rela­tions with the US. The pres­i­dent clear­ly feels that he can­not afford a bruis­ing domes­tic bat­tle with Israel’s sup­port­ers in the US at a time when his abil­i­ty to tack­le the country’s severe eco­nom­ic prob­lems is in ques­tion and with pres­i­den­tial elec­tions loom­ing in just over a year.

Cap­i­tal­is­ing on pop­u­lar revolt

Mr. Abbas, by drop­ping his ini­tial plan to seek recog­ni­tion by the Gen­er­al Assem­bly, has opt­ed for a head-on chal­lenge with the US that is designed to exploit the mood of pub­lic opin­ion in the Arab world where pop­u­lar revolts are fuelled in part by resent­ment at the impo­tence of their gov­ern­ments to effec­tive­ly help Pales­tini­ans assert their rights. Arab states are under pres­sure to appear to back the Pales­tini­ans more aggres­sive­ly after non-Arab Turkey set the tone ear­li­er this month by expelling Israel’s ambas­sador, down­grad­ing diplo­mat­ic rela­tions and sus­pend­ing all mil­i­tary coop­er­a­tion with it. In doing so, Mr. Abbas is rid­ing the pop­u­lar wave that in Cairo led to the storm­ing of the Israeli embassy by mil­i­tant, high­ly politi­cised soc­cer fans.

Apply­ing to the Gen­er­al Assem­bly would have allowed Mr. Abbas to adopt a for­mu­la that would have avoid­ed a head-on col­li­sion with Wash­ing­ton. He could have sought recog­ni­tion of Pales­tine as a state that would not become a UN mem­ber. The US does not have a veto in the Gen­er­al Assem­bly, in which a major­i­ty endors­es recog­ni­tion of Pales­tin­ian state­hood; also its endorse­ment does not have to be approved by the Secu­ri­ty Coun­cil as long as Pales­tine does not seek UN mem­ber­ship.

In forc­ing Arab states to ral­ly around his quest for state­hood, Mr. Abbas has thrown up a bar­ri­er to tac­it efforts by Israel and the Gulf states to find com­mon ground based on their eager­ness to curb the tidal wave of anti-gov­ern­ment protests sweep­ing the Mid­dle East and North Africa that have already top­pled the lead­ers of Tunisia, Egypt and Libya and are shak­ing the foun­da­tions of auto­crat­ic regimes in Syr­ia and Yemen.

Both Israel and the Gulf states fear that the tidal wave threat­ens the exist­ing order in the region and empow­ers the Arab street. It was bare­ly noticed that dur­ing the storm­ing of the Israeli embassy in Cairo the near­by Sau­di embassy was tar­get­ed as well. The pro­test­ers vent­ed their anger at the treat­ment of Egypt­ian pil­grims return­ing from the holy city of Mec­ca, who had been delayed for days at Jed­dah air­port. The pil­grims were insult­ed by Sau­di offi­cials for putting oust­ed Pres­i­dent Mubarak on tri­al for respon­si­bil­i­ty for the deaths of hun­dreds of Egyp­tians in the revolt ear­ly this year that forced him out of office.

Polit­i­cal real­i­ty over­rides com­mon inter­est

Israel and the Gulf states also share con­cerns about Egypt’s Sinai penin­su­la becom­ing a large­ly aban­doned fron­tier for weapons smug­gling and human traf­fick­ing and that could become a launch­ing pad for attacks on Israel along­side the Gaza Strip that is con­trolled by Hamas, the mil­i­tant Pales­tin­ian Islamist group. Also, Israel and the Gulf states both view Iran as a major threat to region­al sta­bil­i­ty; they do not want to see the Islam­ic repub­lic suc­ceed in its alleged efforts to devel­op a nuclear weapons capa­bil­i­ty.

All of that is sec­ondary to the bat­tle lines being drawn over Pales­tine. In a stark warn­ing, Prince Tur­ki al-Faisal, an influ­en­tial mem­ber of the Sau­di rul­ing fam­i­ly, warned that the king­dom will break with the US on Iraq, and per­haps on Afghanistan and Yemen, if the two coun­tries were to go sep­a­rate ways over next week’s Pales­tin­ian bid for state­hood. Prince Turki’s remarks reflect a grow­ing sense in Sau­di Ara­bia that US sup­port is as much a lia­bil­i­ty as it is an asset.

To be sure, the US, Israel and the Gulf states share a host of com­mon polit­i­cal and eco­nom­ic inter­ests. Yet, the oppor­tu­ni­ty to cap­i­talise on that com­mon­al­i­ty is shrink­ing at the very moment when they would ben­e­fit most from increased coop­er­a­tion. The risks involved in act­ing on those com­mon inter­ests grow by the day as the fall­out from Turkey’s rup­tur­ing ties with Israel becomes increas­ing­ly appar­ent. Besides, emo­tions and the polit­i­cal real­i­ty of Arab and Mus­lim pub­lic opin­ion are ris­ing to the fore­front with the Pales­tini­ans gear­ing up in the Unit­ed Nations for recog­ni­tion of their state­hood.

That recog­ni­tion is like­ly be a large­ly sym­bol­ic vic­to­ry, but it is one that could dra­mat­i­cal­ly change the legal play­ing field on which the Israeli-Pales­tin­ian bat­tle is fought.

About The Author:
James M. Dorsey is a senior fel­low at the S. Rajarat­nam School of Inter­na­tion­al Stud­ies at Nanyang Tech­no­log­i­cal Uni­ver­si­ty in Sin­ga­pore and the author of the blog, The Tur­bu­lent World of Mid­dle East Soc­cer.

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →