Vietnam Legacy Shapes Today’s Military Leaders

WASHINGTON, April 29, 2011 — Tomor­row marks the 36th anniver­sary of the end of the Viet­nam War –- a con­flict that claimed the lives of more than 58,000 Amer­i­cans and con­tin­ues to affect the Unit­ed States, includ­ing its mil­i­tary lead­ers and cur­rent wartime oper­a­tions.
The fall of Saigon on April 30, 1975, marked the dra­mat­ic and painful cul­mi­na­tion of the Viet­nam War. The last of the domi­nos were laid when then-Pres­i­dent Richard M. Nixon announced the end of offen­sive oper­a­tions against North Viet­nam after the sign­ing of the Paris Peace Accords on Jan. 27, 1973. The accords called for a cease­fire in South Viet­nam, but allowed North Viet­namese forces to retain the ter­ri­to­ry they had captured. 

With near­ly all U.S. forces gone, and Con­gress’ pas­sage of the For­eign Assis­tance Act of 1974 that cut off mil­i­tary aid to South Viet­nam, North Viet­nam became embold­ened. Its forces began a steady march south­ward toward Saigon, the South Viet­namese cap­i­tal. As the North Viet­namese closed in on Saigon, Oper­a­tion Fre­quent Wind, the largest heli­copter evac­u­a­tion oper­a­tion in his­to­ry, com­menced, mov­ing tens of thou­sands of Amer­i­can mil­i­tary and civil­ian per­son­nel from the city, along with thou­sands of South Viet­namese civilians. 

On April 29, 1975, the North Viet­namese launched a heavy artillery bom­bard­ment that would become their final attack on Saigon. The city fell the fol­low­ing after­noon when a North Viet­namese tank crashed the gates of the pres­i­den­tial palace, accept­ing South Vietnam’s uncon­di­tion­al sur­ren­der. Ho Chi Minh’s dream of a uni­fied, com­mu­nist Viet­nam was ful­filled, and the city once known as Saigon today bears his name. Viet­nam now cel­e­brates April 30 as Reuni­fi­ca­tion Day. The Viet­nam War cost mil­lions of lives, includ­ing 58,267 Amer­i­cans, with more than 300,000 U.S. ser­vice­mem­bers wound­ed in action and 1,711 miss­ing in action. 

The Viet­nam War had a pro­found impact on today’s Amer­i­can mil­i­tary lead­ers, includ­ing Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, the top U.S. com­man­der in Afghanistan. And in many ways, the lessons learned dur­ing the Viet­nam con­flict have shaped the way U.S. forces oper­ate today, par­tic­u­lar­ly in con­duct­ing coun­terin­sur­gency oper­a­tions like those under way in Afghanistan. 

Mullen, the high­est-rank­ing U.S. mil­i­tary offi­cer, is among the few peo­ple still on active duty who expe­ri­enced Viet­nam first­hand. Fresh from the U.S. Naval Acad­e­my in 1968, he report­ed aboard the destroy­er USS Col­lett for duty as an anti-sub­ma­rine offi­cer and par­tic­i­pat­ed in com­bat oper­a­tions off the Viet­nam coast. Mullen speaks fre­quent­ly about how the Viet­nam War affect­ed the nation and shaped him both per­son­al­ly and professionally. 

“The Viet­nam con­flict was a life-defin­ing expe­ri­ence for every Amer­i­can who lived dur­ing that era, and it con­tin­ues to impact us all: the pain, the con­flict, the heal­ing,” he said dur­ing last year’s Memo­r­i­al Day obser­vance at the Viet­nam War Memo­r­i­al in Wash­ing­ton. “The lessons we learned in Viet­nam were bought at a very great price. Act­ing on them is the best trib­ute we can pay to hon­or those who died” — among them, some of Mullen’s own friends and Annapo­lis classmates. 

While he was struck dur­ing that first assign­ment at the inten­si­ty of the con­flict, Mullen said, he soon began to process just how divi­sive the war had become. “What I take away from Viet­nam is the detach­ment of the Amer­i­can peo­ple from the U.S. mil­i­tary — the dis­con­nect and the unpop­u­lar­i­ty of the war,” he told U.S. News and World Report in April 2008. 

Mullen fre­quent­ly tells audi­ences he address­es that he had con­cerns dur­ing the ear­ly days of the war in Afghanistan that it would have the same polar­iz­ing effect. To his relief, he said at the Viet­nam Memo­r­i­al, Amer­i­cans “are so incred­i­bly sup­port­ive of our mil­i­tary men and women now.” 

The chair­man said he attrib­ut­es the changed atti­tudes to the lessons learned from Viet­nam about sup­port­ing troops uncon­di­tion­al­ly. “Dur­ing that time, as a coun­try, we were unable to sep­a­rate the pol­i­tics from the peo­ple,” he said. “We must nev­er allow Amer­i­ca to become dis­con­nect­ed from her mil­i­tary. Nev­er.” Like most oth­er cur­rent mil­i­tary lead­ers, Petraeus, com­man­der of the Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Force and U.S. Forces Afghanistan, entered a mil­i­tary still heal­ing from the Viet­nam expe­ri­ence. Petraeus grad­u­at­ed from the U.S. Mil­i­tary Acad­e­my in 1974, a year before the fall of Saigon. 

But Petraeus has stud­ied the Viet­nam expe­ri­ence thor­ough­ly, even writ­ing his doc­tor­al dis­ser­ta­tion at Prince­ton Uni­ver­si­ty on “The Amer­i­can Mil­i­tary and the Lessons of Viet­nam.” That dis­ser­ta­tion, pub­lished in 1987, rec­og­nized the last­ing impact the Viet­nam expe­ri­ence would have. 

“The lega­cy of Viet­nam is unlike­ly to soon recede as an impor­tant influ­ence on America’s senior mil­i­tary,” Petraeus wrote. “The frus­tra­tions of Viet­nam are too deeply etched in the minds of those who now lead the ser­vices and the com­bat­ant commanders. 

“Viet­nam cost the mil­i­tary dear­ly,” he con­tin­ued. “It left America’s mil­i­tary lead­ers con­found­ed, dis­mayed and dis­cour­aged. Even worse, it dev­as­tat­ed the armed forces, rob­bing them of dig­ni­ty, mon­ey and qual­i­fied peo­ple for a decade.” 

This expe­ri­ence, Petraeus wrote, left many mil­i­tary lead­ers over­ly cau­tious. Specif­i­cal­ly, he said, many felt “they should advise against involve­ment in coun­terin­sur­gen­cies unless spe­cif­ic, per­haps unlike­ly cir­cum­stances” ensure domes­tic pub­lic sup­port, the promise of a quick cam­paign and the free­dom to use what­ev­er force is need­ed to achieve rapid vic­to­ry. Lat­er in his career, as he over­saw the revi­sion of the military’s coun­terin­sur­gency field man­u­al, Petraeus applied some of the lessons learned through the Viet­nam expe­ri­ence. That man­u­al has become the guide for coun­terin­sur­gency oper­a­tions in Afghanistan and Iraq. It empha­sizes that mil­i­tary pow­er alone can’t suc­ceed against an insur­gency, and the impor­tance of pub­lic diplo­ma­cy as part of a “com­pre­hen­sive strat­e­gy employ­ing all instru­ments of nation­al power.” 

Informed by the Viet­nam expe­ri­ence, the strat­e­gy also rec­og­nizes that clear­ing and keep­ing the ene­my from an area alone does not spell suc­cess. A crit­i­cal third tenet, it notes, is the estab­lish­ment of a legit­i­mate gov­ern­ment sup­port­ed by the peo­ple and infra­struc­ture devel­op­ment that empow­ers them. After apply­ing those prin­ci­ples — first while com­mand­ing U.S. and coali­tion forces in Iraq and now as the top com­man­der in Afghanistan — Petraeus said he is see­ing this strat­e­gy bear fruit. 

Petraeus told the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee last month the coali­tion in Afghanistan con­tin­ues to face tough days against insur­gents, but is mak­ing steady progress in improv­ing secu­ri­ty and help­ing the Afghan gov­ern­ment improve gov­er­nance, eco­nom­ic devel­op­ment and the pro­vi­sion of basic ser­vices. “These are essen­tial ele­ments of the effort to shift deliv­ery of basic ser­vices from provin­cial recon­struc­tion teams and inter­na­tion­al orga­ni­za­tions to Afghan gov­ern­ment ele­ments,” he told the panel. 

As the tran­si­tion approach­es for Afghan forces to begin tak­ing secu­ri­ty respon­si­bil­i­ty for their coun­try, Petraeus empha­sized that actions being tak­en now in Afghanistan will have con­se­quences for years to come –- just as those in Viet­nam more than three decades ago. “We’ll get one shot at tran­si­tion, and we need to get it right,” he said. 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →