USA/Lateinamerika

Latin Amer­i­can Engage­ment Requires New Think­ing, Mullen Says

By Jim Gara­mone
Amer­i­can Forces Press Ser­vice

U.S. mil­i­tary-to-mil­i­tary engage­ment in Latin Amer­i­ca will require a change in think­ing and in the cul­ture with­in the armed ser­vices, the chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said yes­ter­day.

Navy Adm. Mike Mullen spoke with Amer­i­can Forces Press Ser­vice on his way here dur­ing a trip that also has tak­en him to Brazil and Chile and will include vis­its to Colom­bia and Mex­i­co.

In Brazil and Chile, the chair­man empha­sized that the Unit­ed States has to rid itself of the ves­tiges of the Cold War to be effec­tive in deal­ing with Latin Amer­i­ca. He said Amer­i­cans have been accus­tomed to look­ing east and west rather than north and south. To change that think­ing, he added, mil­i­tary plan­ners first must admit that’s what they do.

“I grew up in a polar­ized world that was basi­cal­ly East-West. That’s the Cold War,” Mullen said. “Here it is 20 years lat­er, and we’re still break­ing out of that.” The Cold War dom­i­nat­ed U.S. mil­i­tary think­ing for gen­er­a­tions, the chair­man added, and mil­i­tary plan­ners still look to Europe and Asia before look­ing to Latin Amer­i­ca.

The need for the Unit­ed States to focus on Latin Amer­i­ca is obvi­ous, Mullen said. South Amer­i­ca is the Unit­ed States’ largest trad­ing part­ner. Brazil, alone, is the fifth-largest coun­try and 10th-largest econ­o­my in the world.

Latin Amer­i­ca does have prob­lems, the admi­ral said. The main threat to the region is nar­co-traf­fick­ing and the insid­i­ous prob­lem of drug mon­ey. But chal­lenges also exist with migra­tion, ungoverned spaces, eco­nom­ic inequities and cor­rup­tion. The U.S. gov­ern­ment must engage with the lead­ers of Latin Amer­i­ca across the spec­trum, and mil­i­tary-to-mil­i­tary rela­tion­ships can be the cat­a­lyst for much of this engage­ment, Mullen said.

The chair­man also said he wants to cap­i­tal­ize on the ties between the Unit­ed States and the var­i­ous coun­tries of the region.

“When you look at the per­cent­age of His­pan­ics in the Unit­ed States and the His­pan­ic con­ti­nent of Latin Amer­i­ca, there is a great nat­ur­al affin­i­ty that draws our peo­ples’ togeth­er,” he explained. “I just think there are tremen­dous oppor­tu­ni­ties and real­ly impor­tant imper­a­tives for our future.”

U.S. South­ern Com­mand is an impor­tant part of this engage­ment with Latin Amer­i­can and Caribbean nations. Mullen said the com­mand — based in Mia­mi — is doing well with lim­it­ed resources to lis­ten to and engage with lead­ers in the region.

“There’s a whole range of aspects that go with engage­ment,” he said. “It’s eco­nom­ics, it’s edu­ca­tion, it’s secu­ri­ty, it’s cli­mate [and] envi­ron­ment that are glob­al­ly chal­lenges. Doing this con­sis­tent­ly is key to progress.”

The glob­al finan­cial cri­sis presents more prob­lems, Mullen said. The U.S. mil­i­tary will feel the effects of this cri­sis and must be care­ful with how pro­grams are cut.

“There are some rel­a­tive­ly inex­pen­sive invest­ments on the ’soft-pow­er’ side that have huge lever­age,” he said. “So engage­ment invest­ments on the mil­i­tary side — exer­cis­es, exchanges, mil­i­tary edu­ca­tion, staff trips, all the things we do — even in a time of finan­cial cri­sis, we need to be thought­ful about cut­ting those.”

The chair­man said he views engage­ment as a long-term invest­ment. Cut­ting those pro­grams might mean a short-term finan­cial gain, he said, but could end up cost­ing more in the long run.

“I think that’s where lead­ers must be real­ly thought­ful about how we adjust to finan­cial increased bud­get pres­sures,” he said.

Engage­ment requires tan­gi­ble “deliv­er­ables” – equip­ment, train­ing, exer­cis­es and exchanges, Mullen said. He used U.S. mil­i­tary-to-mil­i­tary rela­tions with Chile as an exam­ple.

“There have been plen­ty of deliv­er­ables with Chile over the years,” he said. “The total has pro­duced a real­ly sol­id rela­tion­ship. Chile’s mil­i­tary is much more inter­op­er­a­ble with us than oth­er part­ners.” The same process must hap­pen with oth­er nations in the region, he added.

“One of the mes­sages I took from meet­ing with my coun­ter­part in Brazil is we must make sure we have a list like that and that we work it very hard,” the chair­man said. “There has been great improve­ment in that in the last few years, and they are excit­ed about that. There are great oppor­tu­ni­ties. We have to have a good pace and rhythm with Brazil, which is such an impor­tant part of South Amer­i­ca and wants to be a good part­ner with the Unit­ed States.”

The bot­tom line in U.S. engage­ment with coun­tries in the region is the secu­ri­ty risks the area presents, Mullen said.

“This real­ly is a glob­al risk,” he said, “and I think engage­ment and atten­tion does an awful lot to mit­i­gate and reduce that risk so we don’t get into a big cri­sis.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →