USA — Science, Technology Aid Today’s Wars, Gird for Tomorrow’s

WASHINGTON — The Defense Department’s sci­ence and tech­nol­o­gy effort has two over­ar­ch­ing mis­sions: to help today’s warfight­ers and pre­pare capa­bil­i­ties for tomorrow’s ser­vice­mem­bers.

The trick is to put these two mis­sions in synch, said Zachary J. Lem­nios, direc­tor of defense research and engineering. 

Dur­ing a Defense Writ­ers’ Group break­fast yes­ter­day, Lem­nios said the Defense Depart­ment faces a range of chal­lenges. When he arrived as direc­tor last year, he said, he framed four imper­a­tives to ensure the office gets it right. 

“The first is accel­er­at­ing deliv­ery of tech­ni­cal capa­bil­i­ties to win the cur­rent fight,” he said. Sec­ond, he added, is to pre­pare for an uncer­tain future. 

These two imper­a­tives are at the heart of the orga­ni­za­tion. The office must get tech­nol­o­gy to ser­vice­mem­bers in Iraq and Afghanistan to win today’s fights, but no one knows what type of threat will face the nation in the future, and sci­ence and tech­nol­o­gy mon­ey must be spent to com­bat as yet unknown enemies. 

The third imper­a­tive is reduc­ing the risk, time and cost of acqui­si­tion sys­tems, Lem­nios said. “And the fourth is to make sure we have the under­ly­ing math, sci­ence and tech­nol­o­gy foun­da­tion that we need.” 

Respond­ing to the needs of ser­vice­mem­bers in the field, Lemh­nios said, is the most impor­tant imper­a­tive. Lem­nios said he has met with all 10 com­bat­ant com­man­ders, and it has helped him shape how the depart­ment looks at sci­ence and tech­nol­o­gy base. 

“We are try­ing to put in place a sci­ence and tech­nol­o­gy port­fo­lio that isn’t there just for fun­da­men­tal sci­ence, it’s there for the com­bat­ant com­man­ders and ser­vices and to sup­port the future needs of the depart­ment,” he said. 

Lem­nios receives joint urgent oper­a­tions require­ments direct­ly from the com­bat­ant com­man­ders. A require­ment is a need that is “so urgent it has to be addressed in order to save lives,” he explained. 

“There have been sev­er­al hun­dred of these requests,” he said. Lem­nios’ office con­nects the sci­ence and tech­nol­o­gy com­mu­ni­ty with the com­bat­ant com­man­ders so they under­stand the art of the possible. 

Right now, these needs are cen­tered on the fight to counter impro­vised explo­sive devices, on per­sis­tent sur­veil­lance and on body pro­tec­tion and armor, Lem­nios said. “All [of the com­bat­ant com­man­ders] want the 80 per­cent solu­tion today rather than per­fec­tion five years from now,” he said. 

Exam­ples of an urgent need rushed to the front are Aero­stat bal­loons that con­tain sur­veil­lance cam­eras and oth­er hard­ware to help in pro­tect­ing for­ward bases, the direc­tor said. 

For­ward oper­at­ing bases in iso­lat­ed areas need perime­ter sur­veil­lance, he said, not­ing the bal­loons loft up to 1,500 feet and don’t take much man­ning to operate. 

“We’re now deliv­er­ing these [bal­loons] to all for­ward oper­at­ing bases,” he said. 

The office also is mov­ing a heli­copter alert threat sys­tem along. This sys­tem answers the need to pro­tect heli­copters from small-arms fire, and it was adopt­ed from a sys­tem in place for Humvees. Six­teen micro­phones mount­ed on the chop­pers can pin­point where ground fire is com­ing from. The sys­tem now is mount­ed on Black Hawk heli­copters at Fort Drum, N.Y., and will deploy to the com­bat the­ater in Octo­ber, he said. 

“Both sys­tems were field­ed in less than six months,” Lem­nios said. “We blew through a bunch of bar­ri­ers to make this happen.” 

The office also is work­ing to detect impro­vised explo­sive devices – the lead­ing killers of U.S. per­son­nel. “Think of the IED prob­lem as a sys­tem, in which the ene­my has a vote,” 

Lem­nios said. The depart­ment is address­ing the threat through tech­nol­o­gy, foil­ing the trig­gers, attack­ing the net­works and com­ing up with new tac­tics, train­ing and procedures. 

Sci­ence and tech­nol­o­gy can help in all of these areas, Lem­nios said. 

“This is less about indi­vid­ual tech­nol­o­gy and more about the sys­tem con­struct,” he added. 

All of this IED tech­nol­o­gy and sur­veil­lance results in tera-bytes of data, and sort­ing through it is a major stum­bling block, he acknowl­edged. Lem­nios said the depart­ment is going to tack­le the data-to-deci­sion chal­lenge head on. His office has a tight tie with train­ers at Twen­ty-nine Palms in Cal­i­for­nia and Fort Polk, La., to see “where tech­nol­o­gy real­ly does sup­ply a lever and how do we sup­ple­ment that tech­nol­o­gy con­cept with tac­tics, tech­niques and procedures.” 

But per­son­nel 20 years from now will need capa­bil­i­ties, and the seed corn for these ideas is the basic research paid for today, Lem­nios said. Indus­try looks for pay­outs and gen­er­al­ly does­n’t fund basic research, he not­ed; his­tor­i­cal­ly, the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment or uni­ver­si­ties do that. 

The Defense Depart­ment gen­er­al­ly funds basic research when the depart­ment needs to have a pre-emi­nent posi­tion for a long time or when pri­vate indus­try finds the risk too high to fund it. A large effort is under way in the Air Force to open the next fron­tier in propul­sion, Lem­nios said. The Air Force is devel­op­ing an engine that will use 25 per­cent less fuel at Day­ton Lab in Ohio. 

Lem­nios said he wants the depart­ment to fund the high-risk, crit­i­cal tech­nol­o­gy devel­op­ment, then for indus­try to opti­mize the results and pro­vide the tech­nol­o­gy back to the depart­ment. A sim­ple exam­ple is the way the glob­al posi­tion­ing sys­tem was put in place 23 years ago. “That was a [Defense Depart­ment] invest­ment,” he said. “Today, that’s a shrink-wrapped prod­uct that … is ubiquitous.” 

Anoth­er exam­ple is micro­elec­tron­ics. Orig­i­nal­ly, the Air Force drove that invest­ment. Today, it’s pri­vate industry. 

The part­ner­ship still works. An exam­ple is the all ter­rain mine-resis­tant, ambush-pro­tect­ed vehi­cle that has been deployed to Afghanistan in the thou­sands and is going to coali­tion part­ners also. It went from the idea to indus­try pro­duc­ing 1,000 vehi­cles a month in less than a year. 

“This was sort of on par with what the depart­ment did in World War II to pro­duce air­craft,” Lem­nios said. 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →