Military Commission Panel Sentences Guantanamo Detainee

NAVAL STATION GUANTANAMO BAY, Cuba, Feb. 18, 2011 — After delib­er­at­ing for five and a half hours, a mil­i­tary com­mis­sion pan­el today sen­tenced Sudanese detainee Noor Uth­man Muhammed to 14 years of con­fine­ment at the deten­tion cen­ter here.
But in accor­dance with a pre­tri­al agree­ment, Noor, as he has asked to be called in court, will serve only 34 months — until Decem­ber 2013 — pro­vid­ed he ful­ly coop­er­ates with the U.S. gov­ern­ment.

Noor Uthman Mohammed
A court­room sketch depicts Sudanese detainee Noor Uth­man Mohammed at his sen­tenc­ing hear­ing at Guan­tanamo Bay, Cuba, Feb. 18, 2011.
DOD sketch by Army Spc. Kel­ly Gary
Click to enlarge

“The pro­tec­tions afford­ed to Noor Uth­man in this mil­i­tary com­mis­sion are unprece­dent­ed in the his­to­ry of mil­i­tary com­mis­sions,” Navy Capt. John Mur­phy, chief pros­e­cu­tor for the Office of Mil­i­tary Com­mis­sions, told reporters after the trial. 

“They’re robust and impor­tant,” he said, “and they pro­duce results like those we saw today, where an accused admit­ted his guilt and has also agreed to cer­tain pro­vi­sions that will be impor­tant as we go forward.” 

One such pro­vi­sion is an agree­ment by the detainee to ful­ly coop­er­ate with the U.S. gov­ern­ment, Mur­phy said. 

“Full coop­er­a­tion cuts across every aspect of our work — tes­ti­mo­ny, debrief­ing, meet­ing with agents, prepar­ing oth­er cas­es, pro­vid­ing intel­li­gence infor­ma­tion, and also being ful­ly avail­able to assist the gov­ern­ment in any forum,” he said, not­ing that poten­tial forums include fed­er­al court, mil­i­tary com­mis­sions, grand juries, civ­il pro­ceed­ings and oth­ers. If Noor does not coop­er­ate, Mur­phy added, he would face serv­ing the orig­i­nal 14-year sentence. 

“I’m pleased that we have a sys­tem here that will enable some­one in Noor’s sit­u­a­tion to final­ly bring clo­sure to what’s been a nine-year peri­od of con­fine­ment,” Noor’s defense attor­ney, Howard Cabot, told reporters. The detainee arrived at the deten­tion cen­ter here in August 2002. 

“For the first time,” Cabot said, “Noor can now have some cer­tain­ty in his life.” 

This is the sixth case to be resolved by mil­i­tary com­mis­sions since the deten­tion cen­ter opened in 2002. Those who have been con­vict­ed here in addi­tion to Noor include David M. Hicks of Aus­tralia, Sal­im Ham­dan of Yemen, Ali Hamza Ahmad Suli­man al Bahlul of Yemen, Ibrahim Ahmed Mah­moud al Qosi of Sudan and Omar Ahmed Khadr of Canada. 

A freeze on hold­ing new mil­i­tary com­mis­sion tri­als for Guan­tanamo detainees has been in place since Jan­u­ary 2009, when Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma took office. As a result, Noor’s is the last case the mil­i­tary com­mis­sions office is free to pros­e­cute for now, Mur­phy said. 

In Novem­ber 2009, Attor­ney Gen­er­al Eric Hold­er des­ig­nat­ed three oth­er sus­pect­ed ter­ror­ists to be pros­e­cut­ed in mil­i­tary com­mis­sions. Before it can pro­ceed with the cas­es, though, the office must receive autho­riza­tion from Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates. 

“We have not [yet] tried the most seri­ous detainees in terms of their con­duct. We have not pros­e­cut­ed any high-val­ue detainees in com­mis­sions,” Mur­phy told reporters this week. “That’s not unusu­al in a pros­e­cu­tion,” he added. “Peo­ple at the low­er end of a con­spir­a­cy often aren’t giv­en the biggest sen­tences, but as pros­e­cu­tors move up the pyra­mid and look at more seri­ous indi­vid­u­als, of course, our cal­i­bra­tion in that regard will change.” 

Today, accord­ing to Guan­tanamo offi­cials, the cen­ter holds 172 detainees from 24 coun­tries. Of that num­ber, the Oba­ma admin­is­tra­tion has deter­mined that 48 of the detainees “can­not be pros­e­cut­ed [because of a lack of or taint­ed evi­dence], yet pose a clear dan­ger to the Amer­i­can peo­ple,” the pres­i­dent said dur­ing a speech at the Nation­al Archives in Wash­ing­ton in May 2009. 

“We are not going to release any­one if it would endan­ger our nation­al secu­ri­ty,” Oba­ma said, “nor will we release detainees with­in the Unit­ed States who endan­ger the Amer­i­can people.” 

Call­ing it the “tough­est sin­gle issue that we will face,” Oba­ma said his admin­is­tra­tion would work with Con­gress to devel­op “clear, defen­si­ble and law­ful stan­dards” for those who “in effect remain at war with the Unit­ed States.” 

In the same speech, Oba­ma endorsed the use of mil­i­tary com­mis­sions to pros­e­cute “detainees who vio­late the laws of war.” 

In April, Gates signed the lat­est edi­tion of the Man­u­al for Mil­i­tary Com­mis­sions, amend­ed by the Mil­i­tary Com­mis­sions Act of 2009. The 2006 ver­sion of the act was revised, Oba­ma said, “to bring the com­mis­sions in line with the rule of law.” 

Two days after his inau­gu­ra­tion, Oba­ma announced that with­in a year he would close the deten­tion cen­ter here, but clo­sure has been ham­pered by polit­i­cal resis­tance and most recent­ly by pro­vi­sions in the 2011 Defense Autho­riza­tion Bill that pre­vent the trans­fer of Guan­tanamo detainees to the U.S. main­land and oth­er countries. 

“Despite my strong objec­tion to these pro­vi­sions, which my admin­is­tra­tion has con­sis­tent­ly opposed, I have signed this act because of the impor­tance of autho­riz­ing appro­pri­a­tions for, among oth­er things, our mil­i­tary activ­i­ties in 2011,” Oba­ma said in a Jan. 7 statement. 

“Nev­er­the­less,” he added, “my admin­is­tra­tion will work with Con­gress to seek repeal of these restric­tions, will seek to mit­i­gate their effects, and will oppose any attempt to extend or expand them in the future.” 

Dur­ing a Feb. 17 Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee hear­ing, Gates con­firmed that about 25 per­cent of detainees who are trans­ferred out of Guan­tanamo are thought to re-engage in hos­tile actions against the Unit­ed States and its allies. 

As of Oct. 1, 598 detainees had been trans­ferred out of Defense Depart­ment cus­tody at Guan­tanamo, DOD spokes­woman Army Lt. Col. Tanya Brad­sh­er told Amer­i­can Forces Press Service. 

Of that num­ber, the intel­li­gence com­mu­ni­ty assess­es that 81 are con­firmed and 69 are sus­pect­ed of re-engag­ing in ter­ror­ist or insur­gent activ­i­ties after trans­fer, she said. 

At the Sen­ate hear­ing, Gates said the Unit­ed States “has been very selec­tive in terms of return­ing peo­ple, [but] … we’re not par­tic­u­lar­ly good at pre­dict­ing which returnee will be a recidivist.” 

The Nation­al Defense Autho­riza­tion Act of 2011 “impos­es some addi­tion­al restric­tions on who we can release, and Con­gress put me in the uncom­fort­able posi­tion of hav­ing to cer­ti­fy peo­ple who get returned — that they are no longer a dan­ger,” he added. “So … that rais­es the bar very high as far as I’m concerned.” 

Gates said the ques­tion of where to hold high-val­ue indi­vid­u­als who might be cap­tured in the future, espe­cial­ly if the Guan­tanamo deten­tion cen­ter is closed, is unresolved. 

“If we cap­ture them out­side of areas where we are at war that are not cov­ered by exist­ing war autho­riza­tions, one pos­si­bil­i­ty is for such a per­son to be put in the cus­tody of their home gov­ern­ment,” he said. 

“Anoth­er pos­si­bil­i­ty is that we bring them to the Unit­ed States,” he added. “After all, we’ve brought a vari­ety of ter­ror­ists to the Unit­ed States and put them on tri­al in Arti­cle III courts here over the years. But it will be a challenge.” 

Fed­er­al courts estab­lished under Arti­cle III of the U.S. Con­sti­tu­tion include the Supreme Court, appel­late courts, dis­trict courts and the Court of Inter­na­tion­al Trade. 

Gates said new detainees are not being sent to Guan­tanamo “at this point” and that the cen­ter is unlike­ly to close, at least for now. 

“The prospects for clos­ing Guan­tanamo, as best I can tell, are very, very low,” he said, “giv­en very broad oppo­si­tion to doing that here in the Congress.” 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →