USA — Picatinny engineer pursues improved hand grenade

PICATINNY ARSENAL, N.J. — As far as the design of the basic hand grenade goes, essen­tial­ly it has been frozen in time. The first pull-pin design with a lever and delayed fuze dates back to May 1915 and is often referred to as the grand­fa­ther to the cur­rent vari­a­tion.

 -
Sol­diers engage in grenade train­ing. The hand grenade is famil­iar to the gen­er­al pub­lic by virtue of its fre­quent appear­ance in count­less war movies. Yet the basic tech­nol­o­gy is almost 100 years old. A Picatin­ny arse­nal engi­neer wants to give a mod­ern face-lift to the warhorse of war­fare.
Click to enlarge
 -
Exist­ing grenade design.
Click to enlarge
 -
Here you can find more infor­ma­tion about US Defense Sec­tor

“The basic tech­nol­o­gy is almost 100 years old,” said Richard Lauch, a Picatin­ny Arse­nal engi­neer, refer­ring to the Mills Bomb No. 5.

The Mills bomb is the pop­u­lar name for a series of promi­nent British hand grenades. They were the first mod­ern frag­men­ta­tion grenades and named after William Mills, a hand grenade design­er.

Lauch, who served in the U.S. Marine Corps, has been on a mis­sion to mod­ern­ize the hand grenade so that it is safer as well as eas­i­er to use and cheap­er to pro­duce.

Dur­ing the last year and half of his Marine ser­vice, Lauch was pri­ma­ry marks­man­ship instruc­tor in the Weapons Train­ing Bat­tal­ion at Marine Corps Recruit Depot, San Diego, Calif.

While he was assist­ing in train­ing recruits on the prop­er use of the M67 hand grenade, Lauch became inti­mate­ly famil­iar with what he saw as the grenade’s defi­cien­cies.

The cur­rent grenade fuze design only allows for a right-hand­ed user to throw it in the upright posi­tion. A lefty has to hold the grenade upside down to safe­ly pull the pin.

Also, the cur­rent fuze con­sists of an explo­sive train that is in-line from pro­duc­tion through usage; thus, it is always “armed.”

In a grenade, the explo­sive train is the sequence of events that begins when the han­dle is released. That ini­ti­ates a mechan­i­cal strike on a primer, which ignites a slow-burn­ing fuze to pro­vide time for the grenade to be thrown before the fuze sets off the pri­ma­ry explo­sive.

In an “in-line” explo­sive train, the sequence is always in-place and ready. Until it is removed, a pin in the han­dle is the only thing that pre­vents the sequence from being ini­ti­at­ed.

Lauch believes his design is safer because a lefty or righty holds the grenade no dif­fer­ent­ly, and because the grenade can only be armed by rotat­ing the explo­sive chain in line.

CHAIN OF INVENTION

Lauch came to the Arma­ment Research, Devel­op­ment and Engi­neer­ing Cen­ter, known as ARDEC, in 2008 after work­ing sev­er­al years in pri­vate indus­try.

About a year and a half lat­er, his idea came to Lauch after he read about an injury to a Sol­dier who was train­ing at Fort Dix, N.J. A year and a half after, he sub­mit­ted a patent appli­ca­tion for his project.

The Sol­dier at Fort Dix, a lefty, was prepar­ing to throw an M69 prac­tice grenade and was hold­ing it in an invert­ed posi­tion with the vent port toward her face. Even though the mas­ter sergeant was wear­ing pro­tec­tive eye­wear, when she pulled the pin, the fuze det­o­nat­ed and debris vent­ed, burn­ing her face and blind­ing her for three weeks.

“What struck me most was that a Sol­dier, miles from home for what was sup­posed to be tem­po­rary train­ing, was now sit­ting in her bar­racks room blind­ed,” Lauch said.

Dur­ing Lauch’s research, he noticed that for hand-emplaced devices, the fuze safe­ty pol­i­cy for a new fuze design requires an out-of-line explo­sive train until it is ready to be armed.

“When I start­ed explor­ing a means to make the grenade ambidex­trous, it led itself to an out-of-line design. There was no way around it with what I was doing,” Lauch said. “Some­thing was going to have to rotate. It was just one of the things that hap­pened to fall into place with what we are striv­ing to do.”

Lauch’s patent appli­ca­tion design includes a safe­ty that requires two dis­tinct actions to arm the grenade.

The first motion ensures that users have a firm grip and con­trol of the lever before they can arm it.

The sec­ond motion “arms” the grenade by rotat­ing the explo­sive train in-line. If the tac­ti­cal sit­u­a­tion were to change, the Sol­dier just revers­es the sec­ond step and the grenade is re-safed. Cur­rent­ly, re-saf­ing a grenade requires try­ing to rein­sert the some­times-deformed safe­ty pin, which is not eas­i­ly done.

Anoth­er rea­son Lauch was deter­mined to make an improve­ment was that Sol­diers have been known to make their own mod­i­fi­ca­tions to grenades when they know there is poten­tial for an acci­dent.

“I know that if any­one ever got on my chop­per with a grenade, the crew ensured they all taped the pins in with duct tape so there was no room for an acci­dent,” Lauch said.

How­ev­er, when the tape is removed it may unin­ten­tion­al­ly remove the safe­ty pin, result­ing in seri­ous injury or even death. In recent years the Army dis­al­lowed the tap­ing of grenade pins and start­ed a train­ing cam­paign to rein­force safe prac­tices.

“If we send a fin­ished prod­uct to the field and the warfight­er has to mod­i­fy or alter it for their mis­sion, then we did­n’t do our jobs very well,” he said.

“It’s been going on for decades, from air­crew­men using a C‑Ration can to aid the belt feed on the door-mount­ed M60s to this,” Lauch added. “Instead of telling a warfight­er, ‘Don’t do that,’ we need to make it so they don’t want to make any mod­i­fi­ca­tions.”

After bounc­ing his idea around the office, Lauch became frus­trat­ed that there sim­ply was no fund­ing for his con­cept because there was no writ­ten require­ment for a new grenade design.

With troops in com­bat, the Army places a pre­mi­um on deliv­er­ing capa­bil­i­ties based on what com­bat troops say are their most press­ing needs. The Army has a detailed process to doc­u­ment these needs into writ­ten require­ments.

Lauch believes that the rea­son there is no real require­ment is because the Sol­diers are unaware that a bet­ter ver­sion could exist.

“If you asked some­one in the 1880s how you could improve a horse and car­riage, they would tell you they would want it to go faster. They had no idea that the auto­mo­bile was next in line,” Lauch said.

He became deter­mined to prove that he was at the cusp of some­thing great. Lauch worked dai­ly dur­ing his per­son­al time to bring his idea to real­i­ty.

Lauch then turned to the Inno­va­tion Devel­op­ments Every­day at Army Research, or IDEA, Devel­op­ment and Engi­neer­ing Cen­ter also known as ARDEC, or IDEA pro­gram and one of the program’s “cat­a­lysts,” Andrea Stevens.

An idea cat­a­lyst encour­ages and fos­ters ideas, help­ing to refine exist­ing ideas, to con­nect asso­ciates with oth­er ARDEC enti­ties, and advise asso­ciates on the inno­va­tion process­es.

With some guid­ance and work­ing with Stevens, paper­work was sub­mit­ted for more fund­ing and to acquire a patent for the new grenade design con­cept.

“This is a great exam­ple of the advan­tage of hav­ing an inno­va­tion process and cat­a­lysts there to assist these engi­neers,” said Maria Allende, a Grenades and Mor­tars Fuz­ing Team Leader.

Lauch received some fund­ing from the office of John Hed­derich, exec­u­tive direc­tor of ARDEC’s Muni­tions Engi­neer­ing Tech­nol­o­gy Cen­ter. Lauch pre­sent­ed his idea before the patent eval­u­a­tion com­mit­tee with just two days notice. The com­mit­tee liked what it saw and labeled it a high pri­or­i­ty.

On Dec. 29, 2011, a patent appli­ca­tion was filed.

“We could have put him on any pro­gram,” Edwina Chesky, a Fuz­ing Sys­tems branch chief, said of Lauch when he first arrived at Picatin­ny. “Luck­i­ly we put him on grenade fuzes.”

Lauch and Philip Gor­man, the com­pe­ten­cy man­ag­er for Fuze Divi­sion, agree that there is still a lot of work on the prod­uct that needs to be explored. Final dimen­sions and delay mech­a­nisms are still to be final­ized. A patent does not mean a prod­uct will end up in the hands of troops any­time soon.

SOLDIERS NEED PERSUADING

“There is still no doc­u­ment­ed require­ment from the field and there has been a resis­tance from the user to accept a rad­i­cal depar­ture from the old design,” Gor­man said.

Lauch acknowl­edges that it takes a lot of per­suad­ing to gain accep­tance from Sol­diers.

“But at the same time, it is their opin­ions that you want because they will find any and every flaw you haven’t thought of and if they can’t find any you know you have a good design,” Lauch said.

Cur­rent­ly, there are only 12 pro­to­types in inven­to­ry and fur­ther research is still need­ed. But Gor­man and Lauch believe there are fur­ther ben­e­fits besides improved oper­a­tional safe­ty.

“In the pro­duc­tion of the M67 hand grenade, inspec­tions are con­duct­ed to ensure that none of 20 poten­tial crit­i­cal defects relat­ed to the in-line assem­bly of the explo­sive train are present” Gor­man said.

He said that with the improved safe­ty fea­tures, few­er inspec­tions need to be imple­ment­ed, cre­at­ing poten­tial cost-sav­ings.

Reduc­ing the num­ber of crit­i­cal defects to be inspect­ed reduces the amount of time spent on inspec­tions and test­ing.

“At the end of the day, grenade fuzes are a real bear to make,” Gor­man said. “Dri­ven by the fact that you screw it in-line. This explores the pos­si­bil­i­ty to get rid of that in-line explo­sive,” he said.

For the approval of his patent appli­ca­tion, ARDEC will receive a $200 inven­tion award. Lauch plans to donate the prize mon­ey to the Wound­ed War­rior Project to help oth­er injured Sol­diers like the injured mas­ter sergeant at Fort Dix that inspired Lauch to pur­sue his goal of putting a new grenade out in the field.

Source:
U.S. Army

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →