USA — Official Explains Approach to Climate Change, Energy

WASHINGTON — Devel­op­ing a delib­er­ate approach to ener­gy and cli­mate change is an impor­tant plat­form to nation­al secu­ri­ty and the U.S. mil­i­tary mis­sion, a senior Defense Depart­ment offi­cial told mem­bers of Con­gress here yes­ter­day.

Dorothy Robyn, deputy under­sec­re­tary of defense for instal­la­tions and envi­ron­ment, tes­ti­fied before the Sen­ate Ener­gy and Nat­ur­al Resources Com­mit­tee about the Pentagon’s take on the Cal­i­for­nia Desert Pro­tec­tion Act of 2010.

The pro­pos­al, intro­duced to Con­gress in Decem­ber, requests that hun­dreds of thou­sands of acres of fed­er­al­ly grant­ed land belong­ing to mil­i­tary instal­la­tions and school sys­tems in the South­west be des­ig­nat­ed as nation­al park wilder­ness areas.

The plan also would per­mit con­struc­tion of trans­mis­sion lines to facil­i­tate renew­able ener­gy trans­fer in these wilder­ness areas and pro­vide solar ener­gy com­pa­nies with poten­tial projects.

“The Depart­ment of Defense sup­ports these goals and we want to work close­ly with the com­mit­tee to ensure that mil­i­tary renew­able ener­gy and envi­ron­men­tal equi­ties are pro­tect­ed as you fur­ther devel­op this leg­is­la­tion,” Robyn said in her writ­ten state­ment. “As the Qua­dren­ni­al Defense Review made clear, craft­ing a strate­gic approach to ener­gy and cli­mate change is a high pri­or­i­ty for the depart­ment.”

Pen­ta­gon research has deter­mined that the military’s heavy reliance on oil and fos­sil fuels comes with risks to its tac­ti­cal and strate­gic agen­da, Robyn said. Con­tin­ued use of these resources with­out even­tu­al­ly find­ing alter­nate ener­gy will result in “lost dol­lars, in reduced mis­sion effec­tive­ness and in U.S. sol­diers’ lives,” she explained.

“Unleash­ing warfight­ers from the teth­er of [fos­sil] fuel and reduc­ing our mil­i­tary instal­la­tions’ depen­dence on a cost­ly and poten­tial­ly frag­ile pow­er grid will not [only] sim­ply enhance the envi­ron­ment, it will sig­nif­i­cant­ly improve our mis­sion effec­tive­ness,” she added.

Robyn acknowl­edged that the department’s instal­la­tions – some 300,000 build­ings and 2.2 bil­lion square feet of floor space – account for near­ly 30 per­cent of the department’s ener­gy use. The Pen­ta­gon spent $4 bil­lion on ener­gy for per­ma­nent instal­la­tions in 2009, she said, not­ing the department’s pledge to reduce green­house emis­sions by 34 per­cent dur­ing the next decade.

“The expan­sion of renew­able ener­gy devel­op­ment on our instal­la­tions will be key to meet­ing that goal,” she said. “Com­bined with appro­pri­ate tech­nolo­gies and nec­es­sary ener­gy assur­ance poli­cies, the devel­op­ment of renew­able ener­gy can help mil­i­tary instal­la­tions pro­vide greater mis­sion assur­ance.”

Robyn not­ed exam­ples of the military’s pur­suit of renew­able ener­gy, cit­ing progress at Nel­lis Air Force Base, Nev., where a 14-megawatt pho­to­volta­ic solar ener­gy sys­tem saves $1 mil­lion a year in elec­tric­i­ty costs and avoids 24,000 tons of car­bon diox­ide emis­sions.

Also, Naval Air Weapons Sta­tion Chi­na Lake, Calif., has been oper­at­ing a 270-megawatt geot­her­mal plant since 1987, Robyn said. She added that the Navy is work­ing with the Army to tap into geot­her­mal resources as well.

Some renew­able ener­gy, how­ev­er, can be prob­lem­at­ic for mil­i­tary instal­la­tions, she acknowl­edged. Robyn described how wind tur­bines and solar tow­ers can inter­fere with air­craft nav­i­ga­tion and oth­er radars. She also not­ed that the land on many mil­i­tary instal­la­tions is home to pro­tect­ed wildlife, and that solar projects increase com­pe­ti­tion for water sup­ply.

“We are work­ing active­ly both to iden­ti­fy poten­tial prob­lems well in advance of [select­ing sites] and to devel­op bet­ter mit­i­ga­tion tech­nol­o­gy,” she said. “How­ev­er, some con­flicts may be unavoid­able, and sus­tain­ing our abil­i­ty to con­duct our cur­rent and pro­ject­ed mis­sion require­ments must be our over­rid­ing con­sid­er­a­tion.”

Despite these issues, the mil­i­tary is com­mit­ted to help­ing the devel­op­ment of renew­able and alter­na­tive resources, she said. She acknowl­edged the impor­tance of the leg­is­la­tion to the mil­i­tary and the part­ner­ship between the mil­i­tary and law­mak­ers in draft­ing the bill.

“As a result of that col­lab­o­ra­tion, the bill incor­po­rates many pro­vi­sions that address and pro­tect our oper­a­tions,” Robyn said. “The mil­i­tary has sig­nif­i­cant inter­ests and equi­ties in fed­er­al pol­i­cy deal­ing with the devel­op­ment of renew­able and alter­na­tive ener­gy sources.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →