USA — Leaders Can Pave Way for Openly Gay Troops, General Says

WASHINGTON, Nov. 30, 2010 — A change in the law that bans gay men and les­bians from serv­ing open­ly in the mil­i­tary can be imple­ment­ed with­out irrepara­ble harm, the co-chair of a Pen­ta­gon work­ing group that stud­ied the mat­ter said yes­ter­day.
“It’s my belief, hav­ing now looked this mat­ter exten­sive­ly over nine months, that the lead­ers of our ser­vices — all ser­vices, all com­po­nents — are so good today, so expe­ri­enced today, that they can effec­tive­ly imple­ment this change, main­tain unit cohe­sion, and a strong focus on mis­sion accom­plish­ment,” Army Gen. Carter F. Ham, com­mand­ing gen­er­al of U.S. Army Europe, said.

Ham and Jeh C. John­son, the Defense Department’s gen­er­al coun­sel and the work­ing group’s oth­er co-chair, dis­cussed their find­ings in an inter­view with the Pen­ta­gon Chan­nel and Amer­i­can Forces Press Service. 

Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates appoint­ed Ham and John­son ear­ly this year to lead the group to deter­mine the effects on the mil­i­tary if the law is changed to allow gays to serve open­ly. Ham and John­son made their find­ings pub­lic today, as well as their report, which assess­es the mat­ter and gives rec­om­men­da­tions for mov­ing forward. 

A major­i­ty — about 55 per­cent — of respon­dents to a sur­vey sent to 400,000 ser­vice­mem­bers in the active and reserve com­po­nents said allow­ing gays to serve open­ly would have either no effect or a bal­ance of pos­i­tive and neg­a­tive effects on the mil­i­tary, and between 15 and 20 per­cent said such a change would have only pos­i­tive effects. 

About 30 per­cent of respon­dents said over­turn­ing the law would have a most­ly neg­a­tive impact, and those respon­dents most­ly were part of the warfight­ing spe­cial­ties, Ham said. 

Results showed slight trends in dif­fer­ences among mem­bers of each ser­vice, Ham said, adding that he was sur­prised the feed­back showed few trends among age groups. 

The issue has come under increas­ing scruti­ny as a law­suit chal­leng­ing the 17-year-old law worked its way through the fed­er­al courts this year, and is sched­uled to be heard by a fed­er­al appeals court in the spring. Con­gress has before it a bill that would repeal the law, but it is unclear yet whether they will vote on it before the ses­sion ends Dec. 30 and a new Con­gress takes over in January. 

Mean­while, Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma, Gates, and Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, have said they sup­port con­gres­sion­al repeal of the law. One focus of the debate is whether allow­ing gays to serve open­ly would be detri­men­tal to mil­i­tary cohesion. 

“Any time a pol­i­cy change of this order is con­sid­ered, we know there are inher­ent risks,” Ham said. “In my view, the great­est risk comes if repeal is ordered and we imper­fect­ly apply the changes that are needed.” 

Those risks must receive spe­cial scruti­ny in a for­ward-deployed area, Ham said, but strong lead­er­ship can mit­i­gate risks. “Lead­er­ship is so key in the imple­men­ta­tion phase,” he said. 

Ham and John­son rec­om­mend­ed changes they believe the ser­vices should start mak­ing or think­ing about mak­ing if the law is overturned. 

“For those of us in uni­form, we should take this time we have now to think about repeal, and be pre­pared for repeal should it come,” Ham said. The gen­er­al cau­tioned, how­ev­er, that all mil­i­tary mem­bers must uphold the law that is in place. 

“A key point for all us in uni­form to remem­ber as we think about Don’t Ask Don’t Tell is that the cur­rent law is in effect, and all us in uni­form have sworn an oath to uphold the law,” he said. 

If the law is over­turned, they said, the ser­vices will need to increase costs in train­ing and edu­ca­tion, but should not incur the high cost of cre­at­ing sep­a­rate facil­i­ties, as has been discussed. 

“We strong­ly rec­om­mend against estab­lish­ing sep­a­rate facil­i­ties,” Ham said. “We think that is the wrong direc­tion for the Depart­ment of Defense.” 

The biggest impact for tran­si­tion­ing the mil­i­tary to accept­ing open­ly gay ser­vice­mem­bers, they said, will be in the area of benefits. 

“We rec­om­mend the ser­vices close­ly ana­lyze the costs of extend­ing cer­tain ben­e­fits once the sec­re­tary of defense and Con­gress make deci­sions about which, if any, of the ben­e­fits pro­pos­als we make are adopt­ed,” Ham said. 

Ben­e­fits for same-sex part­ners of ser­vice­mem­bers “is an issue we spent a lot of time on,” John­son said. “It’s a com­plex issue. In and of itself, it could absorb a work­ing group for months.” 

The ser­vices should look at three cat­e­gories of ben­e­fits, John­son said. Some that are “mem­ber des­ig­nat­ed,” such as life insur­ance, already can be giv­en to a same-sex part­ner or any­one the ser­vice­mem­ber choos­es, he said. The ser­vices should con­sid­er whether oth­er ben­e­fits can be reclas­si­fied as “mem­ber des­ig­nat­ed,” he said. 

Some ben­e­fits can­not be extend­ed to same-sex part­ners because of the fed­er­al Defense of Mar­riage Act, which trumps all state laws, John­son noted. 

John­son said Con­gress should change the Uni­form Code of Mil­i­tary Jus­tice to remove lan­guage for­bid­ding con­sen­su­al sodomy. The change should be made regard­less of whether the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell law is over­turned to put the UCMJ in agree­ment with a sev­en-year-old Supreme Court deci­sion, he said. 

The report fur­ther rec­om­mends that all ser­vice­mem­bers who were dis­charged under Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell should be per­mit­ted to re-enlist. “The fact that they were sep­a­rat­ed pur­suant to this law should be set aside as irrel­e­vant,” John­son said. 

Under the cur­rent leg­is­la­tion before Con­gress, repeal would become effec­tive only after the pres­i­dent, sec­re­tary of defense and chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff cer­ti­fy in writ­ing that new Defense Depart­ment reg­u­la­tions and poli­cies are con­sis­tent with unit cohe­sion, reten­tion and recruit­ment, John­son said. 

“If they pass the leg­is­la­tion, we imme­di­ate­ly go into this time where we cre­ate new poli­cies and reg­u­la­tions, then deliv­er it to Con­gress,” he said. There is no lim­it on how much time the admin­is­tra­tion can take in deliv­er­ing its plans. If Con­gress approves them, it would take 60 days to offi­cial­ly remove Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, he said. 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →