USA — Gates Sees Progress in Afghanistan, Despite Challenges

WASHINGTON — Though U.S. oper­a­tions in Afghanistan are prov­ing to be a “tough pull,” as was pre­dict­ed, progress is being made nonethe­less, Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates told “Fox News Sun­day” host Chris Wal­lace.

And, Gates empha­sized, it’s much too ear­ly in the process to eval­u­ate whether or not the Afghanistan mis­sion is succeeding. 

Besides Afghanistan, Gates and Wal­lace also dis­cussed oil spill mit­i­ga­tion efforts in the Gulf, UN sanc­tions against Iran, the repeal of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law, and the defense budget. 

Gates said Army Gen. Stan­ley A. McChrys­tal, the com­man­der of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, not­ed at the NATO defense min­is­te­r­i­al meet­ings held June 10–11 in Brus­sels, Bel­gium, that head­way was being made in Afghanistan. 

“Gen. McChrys­tal briefed in detail on the Mar­ja oper­a­tion as well as on Kan­da­har,” Gates said. “And, the bot­tom line was: progress is being made. It’s [just] some­what slow­er than anticipated.” 

The oper­a­tion in Kan­da­har, the spir­i­tu­al home of the Tal­iban, has been under­way for a num­ber of weeks, Gates said. Mean­while, not all of the 30,000 addi­tion­al U.S. troops tabbed to par­tic­i­pate in the Afghan “surge” have arrived in country. 

“And, so what is tak­ing more time is the shap­ing of the envi­ron­ment before we actu­al­ly engage with troops and so on,” Gates explained. “And so I think that it is a ‘tough pull,’ and we are suf­fer­ing sig­nif­i­cant casualties. 

“We expect­ed that,” he con­tin­ued, “We’d warned every­body that would be the case last win­ter; that as we went into areas that the Tal­iban had con­trolled for two or three years that our casu­al­ties would grow — espe­cial­ly this summer.” 

Nonethe­less, Gates said, McChrystal’s mes­sage to the NATO defense min­is­ters was that the gen­er­al “will be able to demon­strate by Decem­ber that we not only have the right strat­e­gy, but that we are mak­ing progress” in Afghanistan. 

July 2011 is the tran­si­tion date when coali­tion forces start to turn over respon­si­bil­i­ty for secu­ri­ty to the Afghan Nation­al Secu­ri­ty Forces. 

Gates said he believes the Afghan army and police “will be ready to assume pri­mar­i­ly respon­si­bil­i­ty for secu­ri­ty in cer­tain areas of Afghanistan, cer­tain­ly by a year from this com­ing July.” 

Mean­while, he said, the Afghan army is meet­ing its recruit­ing quo­tas and is build­ing toward field­ing 134,000 sol­diers by this fall. The Afghan army’s attri­tion and reten­tion rates, he added, are both above expectations. 

And, though there may be instances of cor­rup­tion among some in the Afghan army’s ranks, Gates said, the major­i­ty of Afghan troops are per­form­ing well in oper­a­tions along­side U.S. and allied forces. 

“We clear­ly under­stand that in July of 2011 we begin to draw­down our forces” in Afghanistan, Gates said. And, both the pace at which that draw­down is con­duct­ed and the num­bers of troops involved, he added, will be based on con­di­tions on the ground. McChrys­tal and senior Afghan gov­ern­ment and NATO offi­cials, he said, will work togeth­er in assess­ing those con­di­tions as they make their recommendations. 

Gates said he per­ceives “a rush to judg­ment” by some of the effec­tive­ness of the new Afghanistan strat­e­gy, not­ing the strat­e­gy has only been in place for four or five months. About 10,000 troops, he said, have yet to deploy to Afghanistan to par­tic­i­pate in “surge” oper­a­tions, while Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma has said that he’ll eval­u­ate the effec­tive­ness of the mis­sion in December. 

“We are still in the mid­dle of get­ting all of the right com­po­nents into place [in Afghanistan],” Gates said, adding it’ll take “a lit­tle time to have this work.” 

Chang­ing top­ics, Wal­lace asked Gates if there was any­thing more the Defense Depart­ment could do to assist in efforts to mit­i­gate the effects of the Gulf of Mex­i­co oil spill. Gates said the Pen­ta­gon has autho­rized the mobi­liza­tion of up to 17,500 Nation­al Guard troops in the four states most-impact­ed by the spill. 

How­ev­er, Gates acknowl­edged, the U.S. mil­i­tary does­n’t pos­sess the kinds of equip­ment or spe­cif­ic exper­tise need­ed to become more involved in oil mit­i­ga­tion efforts. Nonethe­less, he said, the Pen­ta­gon stands ready to do what­ev­er else it can. 

Turn­ing to Iran, Gates observed that impos­ing addi­tion­al UN eco­nom­ic sanc­tions against the Iran­ian gov­ern­ment “has real poten­tial” to deter it from devel­op­ing nuclear weapons. 

“I think you have a rea­son­able chance of get­ting the Iran­ian regime, final­ly, to come to their sens­es and real­ize their secu­ri­ty is prob­a­bly more in dan­ger by going for­ward [toward devel­op­ing nuclear weapons],” Gates said. 

The Unit­ed States and its allies “do not accept the idea of Iran hav­ing nuclear weapons,” he con­tin­ued, “and our poli­cies and our efforts are all aimed at pre­vent­ing that from happening.” 

Gates acknowl­edged that all options remain on the table to dis­suade Iran from devel­op­ing nuclear arms. Mean­while, he added, there still is “some time to con­tin­ue work­ing this prob­lem” through diplomacy. 

The sec­re­tary also dis­cussed the Pentagon’s review to under­stand the impli­ca­tions of a pos­si­ble repeal of the so-called “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law that bans gays and les­bians from open­ly serv­ing in the U.S. mil­i­tary. Pres­i­dent Oba­ma has called on Con­gress to repeal the law. 

“The pres­i­dent has made his deci­sion,” Gates said, not­ing the department’s review aims to for­mu­late how to imple­ment the change and to dis­cern any obsta­cles, prob­lems, chal­lenges and oth­er issues involved in chang­ing the law and how to mit­i­gate any neg­a­tive con­se­quences. Mean­while, mil­i­tary mem­bers and their fam­i­lies are being asked about their feel­ings about chang­ing the DADT law. 

“And I feel it is very impor­tant for the mil­i­tary to have the oppor­tu­ni­ty to weigh in, to reg­is­ter their views on these issues and to give us help on how to do this ’smart,’ should the leg­is­la­tion pass,” Gates said. 

Turn­ing to the fis­cal 2011 defense bud­get request being craft­ed on Capi­tol Hill, Gates said it “would be a very seri­ous mis­take” for peo­ple to believe that Oba­ma would not veto bud­get leg­is­la­tion that would make the Pen­ta­gon buy a sec­ond engine for the F‑35 Joint Strike Fight­er or con­tin­ue pro­duc­tion of the C‑17 car­go plane, both of which the defense sec­re­tary asserts the mil­i­tary does­n’t need. 

On a relat­ed top­ic, Gates urged U.S. leg­is­la­tors to pass the department’s sup­ple­men­tal bud­get request by the Fourth of July Con­gres­sion­al recess. The $159 bil­lion sup­ple­men­tal request con­tained with­in the fis­cal 2011 defense bud­get funds over­seas con­tin­gency oper­a­tions, includ­ing the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, while anoth­er $33 bil­lion is required in fis­cal 2010 to fund Pres­i­dent Obama’s new Afghanistan strategy. 

If the sup­ple­men­tal isn’t passed before the Fourth of July recess, the sec­re­tary said, the Pen­ta­gon will need to plan to make deci­sions that would neg­a­tive­ly impact ser­vice­mem­bers and depart­ment civil­ians by ear­ly- to mid-August, in order to con­tend with major finan­cial dis­rup­tions caused by the lack of sup­ple­men­tal monies. 

And, regard­ing Wallace’s ques­tion to Gates whether he’ll stay on as defense sec­re­tary after the first of next year, the defense sec­re­tary replied, “We’ll just see.” 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →