USA — Fields: Rebuilding Afghanistan Requires Wise Choices

WASHINGTON — A clear under­stand­ing of the Afghan people’s needs and attain­able mile­stones for progress are nec­es­sary for U.S. funds to be used wise­ly, the spe­cial U.S. inspec­tor gen­er­al for Afghanistan recon­struc­tion told Con­gress yes­ter­day.

U.S. agen­cies involved in the effort “lack a full pic­ture of recon­struc­tion projects in Afghanistan,” Arnold Fields told the House For­eign Affairs sub­com­mit­tee on inter­na­tion­al orga­ni­za­tions, human rights and over­sight. He added that the issue “must be addressed to improve the imple­men­ta­tion of what is poised to be the largest over­seas recon­struc­tion effort in Amer­i­can his­to­ry.”

Since 2002, the Unit­ed States has invest­ed more than $50 bil­lion into the war-torn coun­try. A bud­get request sub­mit­ted to law­mak­ers by Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma in Feb­ru­ary would add $20 bil­lion to Afghanistan recon­struc­tion fund­ing. But before the mon­ey is appro­pri­at­ed, Fields said, he intends to ensure it will be used respon­si­bly and that the Afghan gov­ern­ment will be held account­able for the Amer­i­can dol­lars it uses.

Fields’ under­tak­ing was estab­lished in 2008 to help in pre­vent­ing waste­ful spend­ing in Afghanistan. His office reports its find­ings to the White House, the State Depart­ment and the Pen­ta­gon, and it also offers rec­om­men­da­tions to make spend­ing and using fed­er­al funds for con­tract­ing trans­par­ent.

The spe­cial inspec­tor gen­er­al is audit­ing projects and pro­grams dat­ing back to the start of recon­struc­tion in Afghanistan. In the past 12 months, Fields’ office has pro­duced numer­ous reports, which iden­ti­fy issues dat­ing back to 2002, he said.

“We are, by way of the foren­sic effort, going back and deter­min­ing the extent to which funds were wast­ed dur­ing the peri­od in advance of this office hav­ing been stood up,” he said. “Our work has iden­ti­fied sev­er­al issues that ham­per the recon­struc­tion effort in Afghanistan. I am par­tic­u­lar­ly con­cerned about … inad­e­quate plan­ning, inad­e­quate sus­tain­abil­i­ty and inad­e­quate account­abil­i­ty.”

Fields cit­ed a lack of qual­i­ty con­trol for infra­struc­ture projects and agen­cies’ short­ages of qual­i­fied con­tract­ing offi­cials as exam­ples of his delegation’s research. Audits have dis­cov­ered “obso­lete plan­ning” doc­u­ments regard­ing ener­gy and secu­ri­ty, he said.

He also not­ed that mil­i­tary offi­cials are unable to pro­vide the inspec­tor general’s office with updat­ed plans for Afghan secu­ri­ty forces’ facil­i­ties and train­ing, despite the more than $25 bil­lion that’s already been appro­pri­at­ed to train and equip Afghan secu­ri­ty forces.

Not­ing that Amer­i­can tax­pay­ers deserve to have their dol­lars spent respon­si­bly, the inspec­tor gen­er­al said his office has con­duct­ed capa­bil­i­ty mile­stone audits to mon­i­tor devel­op­ment progress of field­ed Afghan units.

“As part of the plan­ning process, imple­ment­ing agen­cies must estab­lish reli­able met­rics to mea­sure progress,” said Fields, a retired Marine Corps major gen­er­al. “The abil­i­ty to accu­rate­ly mea­sure the abil­i­ties of the Afghan army and police is absolute­ly crit­i­cal to the U.S. strat­e­gy in Afghanistan.

“Our audit will — which is yet to be released — will describe weak­ness­es that have affect­ed the reli­a­bil­i­ty of the rat­ings sys­tem,” he con­tin­ued. “And cer­tain­ly, we will make rec­om­men­da­tions.”

This audit already has made an impact on how U.S. and NATO forces, as well as the Defense Depart­ment, mea­sure Afghan forces’ effec­tive­ness, he added. The department’s acknowl­edge­ment of the system’s lim­i­ta­tions has caused U.S. forces to employ a unit-lev­el sys­tem, as opposed to mea­sur­ing effec­tive­ness region­al­ly, he said.

Anoth­er find­ing in the past year has deter­mined that the Afghan gov­ern­ment can’t afford to oper­ate and main­tain infra­struc­ture. This means that while the Unit­ed States has con­tracts already fund­ed for the next few years to pre­serve such infra­struc­ture, it’s only a short-term solu­tion, Fields explained.

And although the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty is com­mit­ted to devel­op­ing Afghanistan’s army and police, the ques­tion that must be asked is how those forces will be sus­tained over time, he said.

“[The inspec­tor gen­er­al] cer­tain­ly sup­ports giv­ing Afghans a greater say in how mon­ey is spent,” Fields said, “but we also believe it is vital that Afghans be held account­able for U.S. funds chan­neled through the Afghan insti­tu­tions.”

Fields’ team already has begun assess­ing what the Unit­ed States and the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty are doing to build Afghan insti­tu­tions to deter cor­rup­tion and strength­en rule of law, he said, tar­get­ing sys­tems cur­rent­ly in place to see how Afghans exert con­trol and demon­strate account­abil­i­ty.

Fields said his team also is review­ing the civil­ian por­tion of the inter­a­gency surge in Afghanistan, not­ing that this audit will seek to mea­sure the effec­tive­ness of per­son­nel and whether or not they’re being “effec­tive­ly uti­lized to achieve strate­gic goals.”

Ulti­mate­ly, he said, the Afghan gov­ern­ment must do its part to be respon­si­ble and account­able to ensure that inter­na­tion­al-pro­vid­ed funds are not wast­ed.

“We are … pre­pared to pro­vide the expand­ed over­sight nec­es­sary to detect and deter waste, fraud and abuse of the increas­ing U.S. fund­ing for this recon­struc­tion effort,” Fields said. “The suc­cess of this strat­e­gy depends not only on how the U.S. imple­ments its recon­struc­tion pro­gram; it also depends on the actions of the Afghan gov­ern­ment.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →