USA — Casey Pledges Ongoing Support of Survivors

WASHINGTON, Oct. 28, 2010 — Army lead­ers are com­mit­ted to pro­vid­ing long-term sup­port to sur­vivors of the mil­i­tary fall­en, and will con­tin­ue to cre­ate and expand pro­grams and resources that will help to achieve that goal, the Army chief of staff said yes­ter­day.

“You need to know that your loved one’s sac­ri­fice is both rec­og­nized and appre­ci­at­ed and won’t be for­got­ten,” Army Gen. George W. Casey Jr. told an audi­ence of sur­vivors and the peo­ple who sup­port them dur­ing the 2010 Asso­ci­a­tion of the U.S. Army Annu­al Meet­ing and Expo­si­tion here. “That’s our com­mit­ment to you.”

Casey, accom­pa­nied by his wife, Sheila, spoke on the impor­tance of sur­vivor care dur­ing a two-hour fam­i­ly forum, one of four held dur­ing AUSA’s meet­ing intend­ed to put a spot­light on mil­i­tary fam­i­lies and the chal­lenges they face.

Casey traced his pas­sion for the issue and desire to help sur­vivors back to his own loss. Just before earn­ing his Army com­mis­sion in 1970, Casey’s father, Army Maj. Gen. George W. Casey Sr., was killed in com­bat.

Decades lat­er, Casey and his wife embarked on a jour­ney to speak with sur­viv­ing Army fam­i­lies around the world to gauge how they were cop­ing, and what the Army was doing to sup­port them. It became clear to both that after five years at war, the Army was just doing casu­al­ty assis­tance, and not much else, he said.

Sur­vivors also expressed a need to stay con­nect­ed with the Army for a longer time, rather than be cut off from the peo­ple and orga­ni­za­tion they had come to see as fam­i­ly.

“We had to fig­ure out how to oper­a­tional­ize those two thoughts,” Casey said.

The result was Army Sur­vivor Out­reach Ser­vices, also known as SOS, which launched in April 2008 to pro­vide ded­i­cat­ed and com­pre­hen­sive sup­port to sur­vivors. Lead­ers tried to build a process with enough struc­ture to call it a pro­gram, but with enough flex­i­bil­i­ty to address indi­vid­ual needs, Casey said.

“Griev­ing is a very indi­vid­ual process,” he explained. “You can’t have a cook­ie-cut­ter solu­tion.”

Casey said he relies on feed­back from a sur­vivor pan­el that he cre­at­ed ear­ly on and includes spous­es and par­ents of mil­i­tary fall­en. He also heav­i­ly relies on feed­back from oth­er sur­vivors across the Army, he said, as he invit­ed the audi­ence to voice their spe­cif­ic issues and con­cerns.

A sur­viv­ing spouse expressed a need for bet­ter pre­pared­ness. She was for­tu­nate, she said, that her hus­band dis­cussed his wish­es for every­thing from his funer­al to his chil­dren pri­or to deploy­ment, which saved her from hav­ing to do so at a very stress­ful time. But many oth­ers don’t want to broach the top­ic, whether for fear of pre­dict­ing the unthink­able or for a lack of the right words. She sug­gest­ed the Army cre­ate a train­ing pro­gram to instill the impor­tance of these dis­cus­sions and to pass on resources that can help them pre­pare.

“Those are the kinds of dis­cus­sions that are very dif­fi­cult to have,” Sheila Casey said. “But I think that they are very impor­tant con­ver­sa­tions.” It’s a gift to know what a spouse or fam­i­ly mem­ber wants for their funer­al or for their chil­dren, she added.

Casey agreed it’s nec­es­sary to plan. His son just returned from a deploy­ment in Afghanistan, and his son’s wife approached him with ques­tions about what would hap­pen if the unthink­able occurred. “That spoke vol­umes about her strength,” he said.

Cre­at­ing a struc­tured Army pro­gram for this issue is chal­leng­ing, he acknowl­edged, since it involves such a per­son­al top­ic. And train­ing still isn’t a guar­an­tee that sol­diers will take the steps to pre­pare, he added.

Hear­ing sto­ries from oth­ers can be just as help­ful, he said. “But we are tak­ing on the train­ing part of this,” he added.

An audi­ence mem­ber praised the military’s sup­port of sur­viv­ing spous­es, but said many par­ents end up feel­ing unpre­pared and lost in the wake of a mil­i­tary death. Those with­out any mil­i­tary affil­i­a­tions can end up feel­ing con­fused and are lack­ing in the same long-term sup­port spous­es receive, she said.

Robert Stoke­ly, a mem­ber of the Army’s sur­vivor pan­el and a sur­viv­ing par­ent, field­ed that ques­tion for Casey. The main focus should be on the spouse and chil­dren, but par­ents and sib­lings need atten­tion as well, he said. Sib­lings, par­tic­u­lar­ly, have received lit­tle to no sup­port, he added.

“I was one of those dads who had no clue what the Army life was about,” he said. “I had to learn a lot fast, and I’m still learn­ing a lot.”

Plan­ning for worst-case sce­nar­ios is just as impor­tant for fam­i­ly mem­bers as it is for the spouse, he said. “If you don’t [pre­pare], you’ll get swept off your feet if it hap­pens to your fam­i­ly,” he said.

Anoth­er sur­vivor said her hus­band returned safe­ly from a deploy­ment in Afghanistan only to take his own life on his daughter’s birth­day in 2007. She applaud­ed the mil­i­tary for its sui­cide pre­ven­tion efforts, but said more needs to be done. Sui­cide car­ries a stig­ma that cre­ates iso­la­tion and an incom­pa­ra­ble loss, she not­ed.

“Not only did I lose my hus­band of 10 years, I lost my mil­i­tary fam­i­ly and my entire unit,” she said. “They don’t know what to say to you.” She said she found help through SOS, but the mil­i­tary needs to expand on these types of pro­grams to com­bat a grow­ing prob­lem.

Casey agreed. “We’re all, frankly, frus­trat­ed by our inabil­i­ty to stem the tide on sui­cides with all the huge effort going on in this area,” he said. “It’s some­thing that’s not just an Army prob­lem, it’s a soci­etal prob­lem.”

The Army’s five-year men­tal health study – the largest of its type on sui­cides – has the poten­tial for enor­mous pay­offs, Casey pre­dict­ed. “It’s already giv­en us great insights,” he said.

Lead­ers also are focus­ing on pro­grams that are designed to build strength, so sui­cide won’t become an option. Casey cit­ed the Com­pre­hen­sive Sol­dier Fit­ness Pro­gram, which fea­tures online men­tal health assess­ments and train­ing mod­ules, as a tool that can help both sol­diers and fam­i­lies build resilience.

The Army needs to raise men­tal fit­ness to the same lev­el as phys­i­cal fit­ness so seek­ing care for an emo­tion­al issue becomes com­pa­ra­ble to seek­ing help for a phys­i­cal wound, Casey said. Doing so will make inroads into com­bat­ing the stig­ma pre­vent­ing peo­ple from seek­ing help, he added.

Casey said he’s encour­aged by evi­dence that the Army is mak­ing head­way. Sur­veys show that 50 per­cent of sol­diers now would be will­ing to seek men­tal health care. In years past, 90 per­cent said they would­n’t, for fear of career reper­cus­sions.

Change will take time, but lead­ers are work­ing on build­ing on ser­vices so they can have the biggest impact for sur­vivors, Casey said.

“Know you have a voice, and let us help you make your voice heard,” he said.

“I ask you to con­tin­ue fight­ing the fight, because as you do it, things will change,” Sheila Casey added. “Don’t let up.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →