Panetta: Afghanistan Tops NATO Conference Topics

ABOARD A MILITARY AIRCRAFT, Feb. 1, 2012 — Defense Sec­re­tary Leon E. Panet­ta said today he will stress dur­ing this week’s NATO defense min­is­ters con­fer­ence that ongo­ing coali­tion com­mit­ment is essen­tial to suc­cess in Afghanistan.

“One of the pil­lars of our strat­e­gy is to build on suc­cess­ful part­ner­ships, and NATO is, with­out ques­tion, one of the most suc­cess­ful mil­i­tary alliances in his­to­ry,” the sec­re­tary told reporters trav­el­ing with him to Brus­sels.

Panet­ta said min­is­ters will dis­cuss key issues such as fund­ing for Afghanistan’s army and police forces, as well as car­ry­ing through the strat­e­gy agreed upon at the alliance’s Novem­ber 2010 sum­mit in Lis­bon, Por­tu­gal. The strat­e­gy calls for lead­ing up to secu­ri­ty tran­si­tion to Afghan forces in 2014 and then con­sol­i­dat­ing the Afghan lead for secu­ri­ty respon­si­bil­i­ty.

As the strat­e­gy out­lines, Panet­ta said, the NATO-led Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Force in Afghanistan will shift dur­ing the final phase of tran­si­tion to Afghan lead in mid-to-late 2013 from a pri­mar­i­ly com­bat mis­sion to a train­ing and advi­so­ry role as Afghan forces take respon­si­bil­i­ty for secu­ri­ty there.

“We’ve got to stick to the Lis­bon strat­e­gy,” Panet­ta said. “The Unit­ed States has a very strong com­mit­ment to Lis­bon and to the strat­e­gy that was laid out there. What we want is for all of our part­ners to adhere to that strat­e­gy.”

Panet­ta said he under­stands French Pres­i­dent Niko­las Sarkozy’s recent state­ment that he would remove French com­bat troops from Afghanistan after an Afghan sol­dier killed four French troops Jan. 20. While he was sad­dened at the loss of life, Panet­ta added, his under­stand­ing is that the French gov­ern­ment still plans to con­tribute to ISAF, pos­si­bly with train­ers.

“My hope is that at this min­is­te­r­i­al, we can dis­cuss this deci­sion and hope­ful­ly bring [France] back into the Lis­bon strat­e­gy so that we can all walk for­ward togeth­er,” he said.

ISAF efforts turned a cor­ner in 2011, the sec­re­tary said, with low­er lev­els of vio­lence, a sus­tained ISAF effort tar­get­ing Tal­iban lead­ers and an Afghan army that “stepped up to the chal­lenge” of assum­ing secu­ri­ty in parts of the coun­try.

“About 50 per­cent of the pop­u­la­tion of Afghanistan will now be under Afghan gov­er­nance and secu­ri­ty,” he said. “That’s an impor­tant step.”

Next year will be even more crit­i­cal, Panet­ta not­ed, as Afghan forces take respon­si­bil­i­ty for the final, tougher areas in Afghanistan, while 2014 will involve “con­sol­i­dat­ing the tran­si­tion, mak­ing sure those gains are, in fact, held.”

Panet­ta said Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma has made clear that U.S. troops will have an endur­ing pres­ence in Afghanistan beyond 2014 — in coun­tert­er­ror­ism and “train, advise and assist” roles, for exam­ple. No final deci­sions have been made about exact num­bers or mis­sions after 2014, he added.

The sec­re­tary said he will seek 1 bil­lion euros in fund­ing for Afghan army and police forces in dis­cus­sions with his fel­low defense min­is­ters, and that he would like to expand the cur­rent fund­ing pool to include more nations, such as Arab coun­tries, Japan and South Korea.

“The key is to have a suf­fi­cient and sus­tain­able [Afghan] force that can be there for the future,” Panet­ta said. “One of the things we’ll be dis­cussing is the size that force should be, but a lot of that is going to be depen­dent on the funds.”

The sec­re­tary said anoth­er key mes­sage he brings to the min­is­te­r­i­al con­fer­ence is the strong and con­tin­u­ing U.S. com­mit­ment to Europe and to NATO. He added he hopes to encour­age the alliance to adopt a strat­e­gy-based approach to future defense needs, as the Unit­ed States did.

The recent­ly released U.S. defense strate­gic guid­ance informs Defense Depart­ment plan­ning for the mil­i­tary up to 2020, the sec­re­tary said, and “in many ways … NATO has to go through the same process, of look­ing for­ward and decid­ing what kind of force” it wants by the end of the decade.

DOD’s Joint Oper­a­tional Access Con­cept, also released in recent weeks, stress­es that U.S. forces must in the future oper­ate and deploy quick­ly, across ser­vices and domains, and with an inte­grat­ed atten­tion to cyber and space threats along with sea, land and air oper­a­tions.

In Sep­tem­ber, NATO Sec­re­tary Gen­er­al Anders Fogh Ras­mussen out­lined his vision for NATO mov­ing for­ward. “We must pri­or­i­tize, we must spe­cial­ize, and we must seek multi­na­tion­al solu­tions,” he said. “Tak­en togeth­er, this is what I call ’smart defense.’ ”

Panet­ta acknowl­edged that bud­get pres­sures argue for com­bin­ing defense capa­bil­i­ties with­in the alliance, but he told reporters that shed­ding vital pro­grams can be risky. “What I don’t want to see is ’smart defense’ used as an excuse for not main­tain­ing core capa­bil­i­ties,” the sec­re­tary said.

The dan­ger in future crises is that a nation that opts out of the sit­u­a­tion “could take an impor­tant capa­bil­i­ty with it that NATO may need,” he added.

Panet­ta said he also hopes to dis­cuss future Euro­pean engage­ment between U.S. and oth­er NATO troops. Even after the Defense Depart­ment removes two of the Army’s brigade com­bat teams from Europe, he said, the region will host the world’s largest U.S. mil­i­tary pres­ence, which will then be 37,000 troops.

A senior defense offi­cial said Panet­ta will meet tomor­row before the for­mal min­is­te­r­i­al con­fer­ence with rep­re­sen­ta­tives from ISAF troop-con­tribut­ing nations, includ­ing non-NATO mem­bers Aus­tralia and Geor­gia. Dur­ing the min­is­te­r­i­al ses­sions, the sec­re­tary will con­fer with NATO ISAF mem­ber nations’ min­is­ters, and will meet Feb. 3 with rep­re­sen­ta­tives of all 50 troop-con­tribut­ing nations, the offi­cial said.

Min­is­ters also will dis­cuss oper­a­tions in Koso­vo, where Koso­vo-Ser­bian clash­es sparked through late last year, the offi­cial said.

“The min­is­ters are going to review strat­e­gy and force pos­ture … [and] make sure that we main­tain suf­fi­cient capa­bil­i­ties there to deal with any renewed flare-up in ten­sions,” the offi­cial said.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →