USA — Army Logistics Leaders Review Progress, Way Ahead

WASHINGTON, Oct. 29, 2010 — A pan­el of senior Army logis­ti­cians this week praised advances they’ve seen in the field while stress­ing the need to retrain the force in mil­i­tary prop­er­ty man­age­ment.

The pan­el was part of the Asso­ci­a­tion of the U.S. Army’s annu­al meet­ing here. 

Lt. Gen. Mitchell H. Steven­son, Army deputy chief of staff for logis­tics, said that while Army logis­ti­cians have done tremen­dous work sup­port­ing the fight in Iraq and Afghanistan, chal­lenges remain in prepar­ing the force for full-spec­trum operations. 

Steven­son said an after-action review fol­low­ing suc­cess­ful relief oper­a­tions in Haiti revealed areas need­ing atten­tion. “What we learned is we have got­ten rusty in some of our skills,” he said. “When you deploy today to Iraq or Afghanistan, you know a year ahead of time. The whole insti­tu­tion is help­ing push you out the door. We know how to deploy forces.” 

But in con­tin­gency oper­a­tions such as dis­as­ter relief efforts, he said, equip­ment that troops are used to “falling in on” in Iraq or Afghanistan has to be tak­en along. The force is now accus­tomed to hav­ing equip­ment pre-posi­tioned, the gen­er­al not­ed, and must retrain on how to account for and main­tain equip­ment on a unit basis. 

“We have for­got­ten some of our basics,” Steven­son said. “We’ve got to get back to that.” 

Steven­son said the force now is accus­tomed to coun­terin­sur­gency oper­a­tions, and needs to pre­pare logis­ti­cal­ly for full-spec­trum missions. 

“We’ve got to keep remem­ber­ing that this war we’ve been involved in since 2001 is a spe­cial kind of war,” he said. “It’s rel­a­tive­ly secure. … We can bring con­trac­tors in to sup­port us. We’ve got to keep remind­ing our­selves of that so we don’t design an Army, and an Army logis­tics sys­tem, that’s reliant on a benign envi­ron­ment where you oper­ate with rel­a­tive impunity. 

“If we get into a full-up, heavy fight with some­body else … we’re not going to have the lux­u­ry of secure sup­ply lines and con­trac­tors who can go where and when they please,” he added. 

Lt. Gen. James H. Pills­bury, Army Materiel Command’s deputy com­mand­ing gen­er­al, said that as the Army looks ahead to reset­ting the force fol­low­ing the cur­rent con­flicts, lead­ers must stress prop­er­ty accountability. 

“That’s a skill that we’re going to have to bring back to our Army,” he said, not­ing that Gen. George W. Casey Jr., Army chief of staff, has empha­sized the need for the service’s lead­ers to get back into a gar­ri­son lead­er­ship role. 

“We have been out of that, because we’ve been deployed so much,” Pills­bury said. “Part of gar­ri­son lead­er­ship is prop­er­ty account­abil­i­ty, and get­ting that cul­ture back, ingrained in our soldiers.” 

Lt. Gen. William N. Phillips, prin­ci­pal mil­i­tary deputy to the assis­tant sec­re­tary of the Army for acqui­si­tion, logis­tics and tech­nol­o­gy, said con­tract­ed secu­ri­ty, vehi­cle main­te­nance and life-sup­port ser­vices such as food, hous­ing and util­i­ties have been cru­cial to suc­cess in the cur­rent con­flicts and have under­scored the impor­tant role Army con­tract­ing offi­cers play. 

“You can nev­er sep­a­rate con­tract­ing from logis­tics,” he said. “It has to be linked.” 

Con­tract­ing, logis­tics and com­bat spe­cial­ists have to inte­grate plan­ning, he said, or “bad things are going to happen.” 

“You waste tax­pay­er dol­lars, and at the end of the day a sol­dier needs some­thing, and you don’t give it to them. You have to be linked,” he said. “That con­tract­ing offi­cer has to sit with that bat­tal­ion com­man­der or that [logis­tics offi­cer] and under­stand what they’re doing. That is crit­i­cal – oper­a­tional­iz­ing how we exe­cute con­tracts is critical.” 

Phillips said in response to Casey’s request for train­ing to devel­op lead­ers’ under­stand­ing of con­tract­ing process­es, the Army is estab­lish­ing a con­tract­ing course for gen­er­al offi­cers and senior civilians. 

“It’s going to be a short course ded­i­cat­ed to con­tract­ing, so our senior lead­ers across the Army that man­age con­tracts and deal with them every day can bet­ter under­stand how con­tracts are exe­cut­ed,” he said. 

Brig. Gen. Jack O’Con­nor, direc­tor of logis­tics for 3rd Army, was the final pan­el mem­ber to speak. As U.S. Cen­tral Command’s Army com­po­nent, 3rd Army man­ages day-to-day oper­a­tions and plan­ning for Cent­com land forces. 

O’Con­nor said the logis­tics chal­lenge involved in reduc­ing U.S. forces in Iraq while surg­ing troops to Afghanistan and sup­ply­ing coali­tion part­ners there had been phe­nom­e­nal. “You can only imag­ine the com­plex­i­ty of what’s going on out there,” he said. 

U.S. bases in Iraq have been reduced from 412 to 90, forces have dropped from 136,000 to 52,000, and 58 per­cent of equip­ment on the bat­tle­field has been with­drawn, he said. Mean­while, 30,000 troops have been added in Afghanistan, and equip­ment there essen­tial­ly has doubled. 

“We did that in under a year,” O’Con­nor said. “That’s what we’re there for — to work through the com­plex­i­ty, the syn­chro­niza­tion and inte­gra­tion. That’s what logis­ti­cians do every day.” 

The effort involved trans­fer­ring not only peo­ple and equip­ment, but also the means to sus­tain them, he not­ed. That means con­tracts for secu­ri­ty, vehi­cle main­te­nance, hous­ing, food and util­i­ties in a com­bat environment. 

“Five years ago when I was in Iraq lay­ing in a lot of these major con­tracts, I thought I’d nev­er see that again,” he said. “Five years lat­er, they all came due, and we had to go out there and resize, reshape, rescope all these contracts. 

“We are doing things today that we nev­er thought we would be able to do with the infra­struc­ture and the tools that were in our kit bag,” O’Con­nor con­tin­ued. “Logis­ti­cians today are fig­ur­ing out new ways to do business.” 

As the Army meets cur­rent mis­sions and resets the force for future mis­sions, he said, logis­ti­cians have to learn from each oth­er as they pre­pare to effec­tive­ly meet future acqui­si­tion, main­te­nance, dis­tri­b­u­tion and con­tract­ing needs. 

“Sup­port­ing mis­sion, peo­ple, team­work,” he said. “We’ve got to be ready. … We know the call is com­ing. It’s right around the cor­ner. We’ll get this one just about right, and a new com­plex­i­ty will hit us right between the eyes. We’re going to be mov­ing out to the next objective.” 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →