USA — Allen Outlines Federal Role in Oil Spill Response

WASHINGTON, May 24, 2010 — The Gulf of Mex­i­co oil spill could soon reach lev­els on par with the 250,000 bar­rels of crude oil lost in the1989 Exxon Valdez tanker spill, the Coast Guard com­man­dant said yes­ter­day in an inter­view on CNN’s State of the Union.

“By the time we get this leak sealed, the vol­ume that’s out there is prob­a­bly going to start to approach that much,” Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen, the nation­al inci­dent com­man­der for the Gulf oil spill, told Can­dy Crowley. 

“Our big con­cern right now is oil that’s com­ing to shore around Port Four­chon in south­ern Louisiana and try­ing to rede­ploy our forces there to meet that,” he con­tin­ued. “At the same time, we’re see­ing tar balls in Mis­sis­sip­pi and Alaba­ma. And this spill has real­ly spread out wide, con­cern­ing its perime­ter, but it’s real­ly con­cen­trat­ed, heavy starts, through­out the area of about a 200-mile radius.” 

In a White House news con­fer­ence today, Allen out­lined the basic com­mand-and-con­trol struc­ture for how oil spill response works. He told reporters that although the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment has over­sight, the spiller is respon­si­ble for financ­ing cleanup, equip­ment and recoup­ing dam­ag­ing, accord­ing to the Oil Pol­lu­tion Act of 1990. In the Gulf of Mex­i­co, the oil com­pa­ny BP is the account­able par­ty, Allen said. 

The leg­is­la­tion was passed after the Exxon Valdez spill, and also cre­at­ed a lia­bil­i­ty trust fund to fund respons­es where there was no respon­si­ble par­ty. The leg­is­la­tion charges Coast Guard area com­man­ders with respon­si­bil­i­ty in those zones. These cap­tain of the port zones work with state and local offi­cials and stake­hold­ers to devel­op pro­tec­tion plans, main­ly for “sen­si­tive areas,” he said. 

Cap­tain of the port zones are present on every sin­gle part of the coast­line of the Unit­ed States. When they have to acti­vate a response, the local Coast Guard com­man­der is des­ig­nat­ed the fed­er­al on-scene coor­di­na­tor and coor­di­nates with state and local gov­ern­ments and directs the respon­si­ble par­ty in the cleanup, the admi­ral explained. “That is the way we have been pros­e­cut­ing this case since the explo­sion on the Deep­wa­ter Hori­zon on the 20th of April,” he said. “Even in advance of the sink­ing of the drilling unit, we were stag­ing equip­ment that was against the sce­nario we would have a worst-case spill. 

“We start­ed actu­al­ly mobi­liz­ing equip­ment sal­vage engi­neers and every­thing right after the event hap­pened into the 21st of April,” he added. For the Gulf Coast spill, the zone com­mands were brought under the com­mand of Coast Guard Rear Adm. Mar­ry Landry, because of the size of the spill, Allen said. Landry over­sees com­man­ders in Mobile, Ala., which cov­ers Mis­sis­sip­pi, Alaba­ma and west­ern Flori­da. Landry also super­vis­es a com­mand in St. Peters­burg and Key West, Fla. 

“If some­thing gets large enough where there’s a nation­al issue,” Allen said, “it will come up to the nation­al response team.” 

The nation­al response team con­sists of the Envi­ron­men­tal Pro­tec­tion Agency, the Coast Guard, the Nation­al Ocean­ic and Atmos­pher­ic Admin­is­tra­tion and oth­ers. Also, the pres­i­dent can declare “a spill of nation­al sig­nif­i­cance” if the coor­di­na­tion becomes “com­pli­cat­ed,” Allen added. 

“This is not pol­i­cy,” he said. “This is a com­mand-and-con­trol struc­ture. It’s actu­al­ly con­tained in the Code of Fed­er­al Reg­u­la­tions that imple­ments the Oil Pol­lu­tion Act of 1990. So there are actu­al­ly clear definitions.” 

Allen said the fed­er­al response team “needs to make sure [BP] exe­cute their respon­si­bil­i­ties as the respon­si­ble par­ty and we car­ry out our respon­si­bil­i­ties and be account­able as the fed­er­al on-scene coordinators.” 

Allen also explained that in this role, the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment can issue an order to BP to apply resources in a par­tic­u­lar way if the gov­ern­ment is not pleased with BP’s method. How­ev­er, BP, or the respon­si­ble par­ty, is the one with the means to deal with the spill. The mil­i­tary does not have the equip­ment or tech­nol­o­gy to address the Gulf Coast spill alone, he said. 

“Ulti­mate­ly, we are account­able to make sure [BP cleans up the spill],” he said. “The law requires them to play a cer­tain role, to pay for it, to pro­vide equip­ment and so forth, and par­tic­u­lar­ly with try­ing to deal with a leak on the bot­tom of the ocean there — 5,000 feet down.” 

While BP works to cap the leak, states have request­ed sup­port from the Army Corps of Engi­neers to pre­vent oil dam­age ashore. Louisiana has applied for a per­mit that sug­gests estab­lish­ing a sys­tem of bar­ri­er islands and berm struc­tures, the admi­ral said. 

The Army is eval­u­at­ing the requests and look­ing at costs and sched­ule as well as issues the engi­neers may face. Build­ing the bar­ri­er islands could take as long nine months. The review is still ongo­ing by the Army and Coast Guard, he added. 

Oth­er U.S. mil­i­tary sup­port comes from the Air Force, who has been con­duct­ing aer­i­al spray mis­sions to help in neu­tral­iz­ing the oil spill with dis­pers­ing agents. Also, the Air Force is trans­port­ing boom from Alas­ka. Mean­while, the Navy is sup­ply­ing ves­sels to act as stag­ing plat­forms for BP work­ers and equip­ment. Allen esti­mates that it could take until August to cap the oil spill. 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →