U.S. Must Sustain Military Strength, Gates Says

WASHINGTON, Nov. 16, 2010 — Even in a time of bud­getary con­straints, the Unit­ed States must main­tain its mil­i­tary might to address the secu­ri­ty chal­lenges of today and the future, Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates said today.
“Giv­en the secu­ri­ty chal­lenges that the U.S. is like­ly to face around the world — and the unfor­tu­nate real­i­ty that most of our allies are reduc­ing their mil­i­taries — the bur­dens on us and the secu­ri­ty chal­lenges are going to remain unchanged and poten­tial­ly even increase in the future — there­fore, the need to sus­tain force struc­ture,” he said.

Speak­ing at the Wall Street Journal’s CEO Coun­cil here, Gates said he is sym­pa­thet­ic to the chal­lenges caused by the fed­er­al deficit. “If you cut the defense bud­get by 10 per­cent — which would be cat­a­stroph­ic in terms of force struc­ture — that’s $55 bil­lion out of a $1.4 tril­lion deficit,” he said. “We are not the problem.” 

The sec­re­tary addressed rec­om­men­da­tions from the Nation­al Com­mis­sion on Fis­cal Respon­si­bil­i­ty and Reform, which has rec­om­mend­ed cut­ting defense pro­cure­ment by 15 per­cent and its research and devel­op­ment by 10 per­cent. The com­mis­sion also rec­om­mend­ed freez­ing non-com­bat mil­i­tary and civil­ian pay. Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma appoint­ed Ersk­ine Bowles and for­mer U.S. Sen. Alan Simp­son to co-chair the pan­el in April. They pre­sent­ed their report last week. 

Gates called the commission’s rec­om­men­da­tion to slash the defense bud­get “math, not strategy.” 

“Frankly, the idea that Defense would take half of the cut in dis­cre­tionary spend­ing, par­tic­u­lar­ly giv­en what we’re try­ing to do in terms of pre­serv­ing secu­ri­ty, is a prob­lem,” he said. 

The sec­re­tary has launched his own ini­tia­tive to cut over­head costs and allow the ser­vices to keep the sav­ings to re-invest in the needs of troops. The depart­ment needs to main­tain about 3 per­cent real growth in capa­bil­i­ties in order to sus­tain the present force struc­ture, he said. 

“What we are try­ing to do in the Depart­ment of Defense is fig­ure out how you kill pro­grams that aren’t work­ing,” Gates said. “How do we devel­op the broad­est capa­bil­i­ties for the widest range of sce­nar­ios, and sus­tain the strength this coun­try needs? That means going in with a scalpel instead of a meat axe and fig­ure out how we do business.” 

Gates said he aims to take $100 bil­lion out of over­head – the “tail” — and re-invest it in the “tooth side” of the depart­ment. He said he’s got­ten the coop­er­a­tion of the ser­vices by reas­sur­ing them that they can re-invest the sav­ings. “So what the Navy finds in sav­ings, they can apply to ship build­ing,” he said. “The same way with the oth­er services.” 

The sec­re­tary also said he hopes to find between $15 bil­lion and $20 bil­lion in sav­ings out­side of the mil­i­tary ser­vices that he can then rein­vest in the ser­vices. “I think that has incen­tivized the ser­vices to real­ly look very hard at the way they do busi­ness,” he said. “This isn’t a mat­ter of doing the same things we’re doing with 10 per­cent less mon­ey. It’s fig­ur­ing out new ways to do business.” 

Gates also addressed some of the secu­ri­ty threats the nation faces today and may face in the future. 

On Afghanistan, the sec­re­tary addressed media reports of ten­sion between Afghanistan Pres­i­dent Hamid Karzai and U.S. and NATO lead­ers. “Pres­i­dent Karzai is our part­ner,” he said. “He will be the pres­i­dent of Afghanistan until his sec­ond term is out in 2014. We will con­tin­ue to part­ner with him through this conflict.” 

Gates said he believes Karzai’s recent com­ments about increas­ing Afghan con­trol of secu­ri­ty shows the leader’s frus­tra­tions with three decades of war. “I think Pres­i­dent Karzai is reflect­ing the impa­tience of a coun­try that’s been at war for 30 years,” he said. 

“I think what Pres­i­dent Karzai was artic­u­lat­ing was the desire to see Afghanistan get to the point where… it was in the 1950s and ’60s when the pri­ma­ry Amer­i­can pres­ence was a devel­op­ment pres­ence. We were build­ing roads; we were putting in irri­ga­tion sys­tems,” he said. 

“We share that desire,” he added. “The prob­lem is, we can’t get from here to there tomorrow.” 

Gates said he expects NATO to address the issue of tran­si­tion­ing secu­ri­ty to the Afghans at its sum­mit in Lis­bon lat­er this week. NATO “prob­a­bly will embrace Pres­i­dent Karzai’s own stat­ed goal of hav­ing a tran­si­tion of respon­si­bil­i­ty for secu­ri­ty com­plete by 2014,” he said. 

The sec­re­tary added that Afghan secu­ri­ty forces already are play­ing a sig­nif­i­cant role in their country’s secu­ri­ty. In one of the most aggres­sive oper­a­tions, in Kan­da­har, Afghans account for 60–75 per­cent of the secu­ri­ty forces and are lead­ing the oper­a­tion, he said. 

On Pak­istan, Gates said the gov­ern­ment has exceed­ed his expec­ta­tions in its deci­sion to focus its mil­i­tary on the Tal­iban insur­gency. “If you had told me two years ago that Pak­istan would have 140,000 troops on its west­ern bor­der fight­ing the Tal­iban and the var­i­ous oth­er ter­ror­ist groups that are in that area, I would have thought that impos­si­ble,” he said.

“If you had told me again two years ago that they would have occu­pied Swat and south Waziris­tan and be going after these peo­ple, be work­ing with us, and part­ner­ing with us as we coor­di­nate on both sides of the bor­der, I would have thought that was a reach,” he said. 

Gates said he believes Pak­istan changed course against the Tal­iban because of strate­gic dis­cus­sions with U.S. and NATO lead­ers that have built a rela­tion­ship of trust and a “com­mon under­stand­ing of the mutu­al threats that we face.” 

On Yemen, Gates said that coun­try, as well as Soma­lia and oth­er parts of north Africa, have become ter­ror­ist havens as oper­a­tions in Afghanistan and Pak­istan have caused the ter­ror­ist move­ment to “metas­ti­cize” to oth­er areas. The Unit­ed State’s best tool in Yemen is form­ing a part­ner­ship with the gov­ern­ment so it can defeat ter­ror­ism in its own country. 

“We don’t need anoth­er war,” he said. “The Yeme­nis have shown a will­ing­ness to go after al Qai­da on the Ara­bi­an Penin­su­la. They’re work­ing with us, with the Saud­is, and with others. 

“One of the big themes over the last cou­ple of years for us has been what we call build­ing part­ner­ship capac­i­ty, which is giv­ing them the equip­ment and the train­ing so they can do the job them­selves,” he added. “This is the theme behind a lot of our efforts in Africa as well as in the Mid­dle East. That’s our best tool.” 

On Iran, Gates said the world must keep polit­i­cal and eco­nom­ic pres­sure on the coun­try to keep it from devel­op­ing a nuclear weapons pro­gram. “The only long-term solu­tion in avoid­ing an Iran­ian nuclear weapons capa­bil­i­ty is for the Ira­ni­ans to decide it’s not in their inter­est,” he said. “Every­thing else is a short-term solu­tion, is a two-to-three year solution.” 

The sec­re­tary said he believes the cur­rent sanc­tions have been much hard­er on Iran than its lead­ers antic­i­pat­ed, and that they are “hav­ing an impact.” 

Gates said he does not believe a “mil­i­tary solu­tion” is the right way to deal with Iran. “If it’s a mil­i­tary solu­tion, as far as I’m con­cerned, it will bring togeth­er a divid­ed nation,” he said. “It will only make them absolute­ly com­mit­ted to obtain­ing nuclear weapons and they will just go deep­er and more covert. So I think the polit­i­cal-eco­nom­ic strat­e­gy is the one that we have to con­tin­ue to pur­sue and ratch­et up and cre­ate an exit for them.” 

If Iran builds con­fi­dence with the Unit­ed Nations “then there is a way out of the box they’ve got­ten them­selves in,” he said. 

(AFPS Writer Jim Gara­mone con­tributed to this report). 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →