U.S. Missile Defense Counters Growing Threat

WASHINGTON, April 19, 2012 — Six days after North Korea’s failed long-range rock­et launch, the head of the Defense Department’s Mis­sile Defense Agency tes­ti­fied on Capi­tol Hill about bol­ster­ing U.S. defens­es against a grow­ing bal­lis­tic mis­sile threat.

Agency Direc­tor Army Lt. Gen. Patrick J. O’Reil­ly appeared yes­ter­day before the Sen­ate Appro­pri­a­tions Committee’s defense sub­com­mit­tee to dis­cuss the administration’s fis­cal 2013 bud­get request of $7.75 bil­lion for his agency. 

The request is a reduc­tion of more than $650 mil­lion from the fis­cal 2012 appro­pri­a­tion. Since 1999, the Unit­ed States has invest­ed more than $90 bil­lion in mis­sile defense. 

The lat­est request, O’Reil­ly said, “bal­ances our poli­cies as doc­u­ment­ed in the 2010 Bal­lis­tic Mis­sile Defense Review [with] U.S. Strate­gic Command’s inte­grat­ed air and mis­sile defense pri­or­i­ties, [Mis­sile Defense Agency] tech­ni­cal fea­si­bil­i­ty assess­ments, afford­abil­i­ty con­straints and cur­rent intel­li­gence com­mu­ni­ty esti­mates of the bal­lis­tic mis­sile threat.” 

But the direc­tor expressed con­cern to the pan­el about two crit­i­cal­ly need­ed pro­grams that are in jeop­ardy because of past con­gres­sion­al fund­ing reductions. 

The first, he said, is a mis­sile defense sen­sor capa­bil­i­ty pro­vid­ed by the pre­ci­sion track­ing space sys­tem, which allows space-based track­ing of bal­lis­tic mis­siles. The sec­ond is the need to devel­op a sec­ond inde­pen­dent lay­er of home­land defense with the SM‑3 IIB inter­cep­tor, a high­ly deploy­able mis­sile that would destroy threat mis­siles ear­li­er in their flight paths than the cur­rent architecture. 

“I request your sup­port for these pro­grams,” O’Reil­ly said, “so that our home­land ben­e­fits from the same lay­ered mis­sile defense approach that we suc­cess­ful­ly employ in our region­al defenses.” 

The direc­tor described improve­ments made last year to the com­plex bal­lis­tic mis­sile defense sys­tem designed to pro­tect the Unit­ed States and its allies. These include acti­vat­ing a new mis­sile field and a fire-con­trol node at Fort Greely, Alas­ka; acti­vat­ing an upgrad­ed ear­ly warn­ing radar in Thule, Green­land; and upgrad­ing the reli­a­bil­i­ty of three ground-based inter­cep­tors, or GBIs, he said. 

“This year,” O’Reil­ly told the pan­el, “we con­tin­ue to aggres­sive­ly pur­sue the agency’s high­est pri­or­i­ty — to con­duct a mis­sile inter­cept with the newest ver­sion of the GBI’s exo-atmos­pher­ic kill vehi­cle after two pre­vi­ous flight-test failures.” 

A fail­ure review board of gov­ern­ment and indus­try experts redesigned crit­i­cal GBI kill vehi­cle com­po­nents and estab­lished more strin­gent man­u­fac­tur­ing and com­po­nent require­ments, he added. 

“These require­ments have pre­vi­ous­ly not been encoun­tered any­where in the aero­space indus­try,” O’Reil­ly not­ed, adding that these have caused delays in prepar­ing for the next flight tests. 

“We will fly a non­in­ter­cept test by the end of this year to ver­i­fy we have resolved all issues, and then we will con­duct our next inter­cept flight test ear­ly next year to reac­ti­vate the {ground-based mid­course defense] pro­duc­tion line,” the direc­tor said. “We will not approve the exe­cu­tion of a flight test until our engi­neers and inde­pen­dent experts are con­vinced that we have resolved all issues dis­cov­ered in pre­vi­ous testing.” 

Also this year, the agency will acti­vate a hard­ened pow­er plant at Fort Greely, increase the fire­pow­er of field­ed GBIs by test­ing and upgrad­ing GBI com­po­nents, and boost the capa­bil­i­ty of sea-based X‑band radar, the track­ing and dis­crim­i­na­tion radar used for the GMD ele­ment of the Bal­lis­tic Mis­sile Defense System. 

“Region­al defense high­lights over the past year include the on-time deploy­ment of the first phase of the Euro­pean Phased Adap­tive Approach,” O’Reil­ly said, “con­sist­ing of the com­mand-and-con­trol node in Ger­many, for­ward-based radar in Turkey and an Aegis mis­sile defense ship on sta­tion in the Mediter­ranean Sea.” 

The agency also demon­strat­ed the first Aegis inter­cept of a 3,700-kilometer tar­get using remote for­ward-based radar, he said, and the simul­ta­ne­ous inter­cept of two mis­siles by the ter­mi­nal high-alti­tude area defense sys­tem, called THAAD

The THAAD ele­ment gives the mis­sile defense sys­tem a glob­al­ly trans­portable, rapid­ly deploy­able abil­i­ty to inter­cept and destroy bal­lis­tic mis­siles in or out of the atmos­phere dur­ing the final, or ter­mi­nal, flight phase. 

“This year the first two THAAD bat­ter­ies will be avail­able for deploy­ment, increas­ing the num­ber of Aegis-capa­ble ships to 29,” the direc­tor said, and three SM‑3 Block IB flight tests will show that last year’s flight-test fail­ure is resolved. 

Com­ing up, he said, the largest mis­sile defense tests in his­to­ry will involve the first simul­ta­ne­ous inter­cepts of mul­ti­ple short and medi­um-range bal­lis­tic mis­siles and cruise mis­siles by Patri­ot for­ward-based radar. 

The Unit­ed States has mis­sile defense coop­er­a­tive pro­grams with the Unit­ed King­dom, Japan, Aus­tralia, Israel, Den­mark, Ger­many, the Nether­lands, the Czech Repub­lic, Poland, Italy and many oth­er nations. O’Reil­ly said the agency works with more than 20 coun­tries, “includ­ing our coop­er­a­tive devel­op­ment pro­grams with Israel and Japan and our first for­eign mil­i­tary sale of THAAD to the Unit­ed Arab Emi­rates,” and sup­ports tech­ni­cal dis­cus­sions with the Rus­sians on mis­sile defense. 

Phas­es 2 and 3 of the Euro­pean phased, adap­tive approach to mis­sile defense are on track to meet the 2015 and 2018 deploy­ment dates, the direc­tor said. 

U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →