US Military Logistics Strained, But Healthy, Official Says

WASHINGTON, Jan. 10, 2012 — The state of mil­i­tary logis­tics is healthy and ser­vice mem­bers are doing amaz­ing things to sup­ply oper­a­tions around the world, but the sys­tem is strained as a result of 10 years of war, the Joint Staff’s direc­tor of logis­tics said here.

 -
Twen­ty pal­lets of para­chute-deliv­ered sup­plies float down over For­ward Oper­at­ing Base Bay­lough in Afghanistan’s Zab­ul province, June 13, 2010. The sup­plies were for sol­diers assigned to Com­pa­ny D, 1st Bat­tal­ion, 4th Infantry Reg­i­ment. U.S. Army pho­to by Staff Sgt. William Trem­blay
Click to enlarge

Air Force Lt. Gen. Brooks L. Bash said mil­i­tary logis­ti­cians are, in many respects, the unsung heroes of America’s 21st-cen­tu­ry wars. In the past year alone, they orches­trat­ed the with­draw­al of tens of thou­sands of Amer­i­can ser­vice mem­bers and mil­lions of pieces of equip­ment from Iraq. They sup­plied forces fight­ing in Afghanistan, even as polit­i­cal con­sid­er­a­tions closed a key route into the land­locked coun­try.

They did all this while con­tin­u­ing their “every­day” mis­sions – han­dling per­ma­nent changes of sta­tion for tens of thou­sands of ser­vice mem­bers, ensur­ing train­ing require­ments are met and ensur­ing that for­ward-deployed per­son­nel around the world have what they need to do their mis­sions. They also have sup­plied allies and oth­er U.S. gov­ern­ment agen­cies, and they have kicked into even high­er gear to aid peo­ple around the world hit by nat­ur­al dis­as­ters.

“No oth­er coun­try in the world can do what we’re doing,” Bash said. “We’re fly­ing and tak­ing stuff halfway around the world. The fact that Afghanistan is a land­locked coun­try adds to the chal­lenge. Simul­ta­ne­ous­ly com­plet­ing the Iraq draw­down and then, oh, by the way, doing Haiti, tsuna­mi, and what­ev­er else pops up, and also sup­port­ing the com­bat­ant com­man­ders in their regions with what they’re doing every day.”

And logis­ti­cians are sus­tain­ing the effort. Oth­er coun­tries can get troops to remote areas of the world, but they can­not sus­tain oper­a­tions in those regions like the U.S. mil­i­tary can, the gen­er­al said.

Afghanistan is a case in point. It is one of the more remote areas on the plan­et. It is land­locked. Pak­istan closed the bor­der cross­ings from the port of Karachi to Afghanistan fol­low­ing an acci­dent on the bor­der that killed 24 Pak­istani sol­diers.

Even though those gates are closed, Bash not­ed, Amer­i­can, inter­na­tion­al and Afghan forces are still get­ting what they need. The Amer­i­can logis­tics effort sup­plies 91,000 U.S. per­son­nel with the food, ammu­ni­tion, fuel, spare parts, armored vehi­cles and what­ev­er else they need.

“The first thing we did was we planned for it,” the gen­er­al said. The Pak­ista­nis had closed the gates to Afghanistan before, and logis­ti­cians planned for the pos­si­bil­i­ty.

Plan­ners looked at alter­na­tives to the Pak­istani gates. They exam­ined sup­ply­ing troops by air, Bash said, but that is expen­sive and can be lim­it­ed. They devel­oped the North­ern Dis­tri­b­u­tion Net­work – an effort that con­nects Baltic and Caspi­an Sea ports with Afghanistan through Rus­sia and the coun­tries of Cen­tral Asia and the Cau­ca­sus.

“We … have shift­ed about 30 per­cent of what was com­ing in through Pak­istan to the north­ern dis­tri­b­u­tion,” Bash said. “It has more capa­bil­i­ty, and then we built up some of our stocks.”

Logis­ti­cians built up 60 days worth of stocks in Afghanistan. “But because of the north­ern dis­tri­b­u­tion being open, … it is hav­ing lit­tle to no oper­a­tional impact,” he said.

This is more expen­sive, but it is effec­tive, the gen­er­al said. About 85 per­cent of fuel, for exam­ple, comes through the North­ern Dis­tri­b­u­tion Net­work. Logis­ti­cians also are using more air­lift, and that caus­es prob­lems on its own, the gen­er­al said.

Allies, like­wise, built up stocks. “We have acqui­si­tion cross-ser­vic­ing agree­ments with them so that, if they do come up short, then we can help them out through those sorts of agree­ments,” Bash said.

So while there are no short­ages, the increased tem­po impos­es its own price on logis­ti­cians.

“There are areas in logis­tics – some of our spe­cial­ty areas and our equip­ment and oth­ers that need to be recap­i­tal­ized and reset,” Bash said. Putting flight hours on air­planes and heli­copters and putting miles on mine-resis­tant, ambush-pro­tect­ed vehi­cles, for exam­ple, takes a toll on the equip­ment, he explained.

And there is a cost to the peo­ple in the logis­tics enter­prise as well, Bash said, but they con­tin­ue to get the job done.

“I would say our logis­ti­cians are the most expe­ri­enced in his­to­ry,” he said. Logis­tics per­son­nel are the great­est com­bat mul­ti­pli­er in the logis­tics enter­prise, he added.

Edu­cat­ing and train­ing those per­son­nel is key to suc­cess in the future, the gen­er­al said.

“We might decrease the num­ber of our peo­ple, but the peo­ple we do have, we need to make sure they’re expe­ri­enced and trained prop­er­ly,” he said. “We can’t short­cut our­selves on that piece to save some mon­ey, because it’s the peo­ple when we talk about avoid­ing a hol­low force.”

Force struc­ture adjust­ments will be nec­es­sary in the logis­tics field, the gen­er­al said, and the Defense Depart­ment must be care­ful to pre­serve what tru­ly is nec­es­sary — first of all, the peo­ple need­ed for the effort — regard­less of the bud­get sit­u­a­tion.

It’s also impor­tant, Bash said, to ensure there is not a mis­match between strat­e­gy and resources.

“If you have a strat­e­gy that’s larg­er than your force struc­ture, then that’s a dif­fer­ent type of hol­low­ness than we typ­i­cal­ly think of as a hol­low force,” he said.

Anoth­er neces­si­ty is access. The best fight­ing force in the world is no good if it can­not get to the scene of a fight and sus­tain itself, Bash not­ed. This means get­ting the air­ports, sea­ports, rail­heads and over­flight per­mis­sions need­ed. It also means the com­bat­ant com­man­ders, long before any prob­lems devel­op, must have the rela­tion­ships need­ed to make it hap­pen when push comes to shove, he said. A final mul­ti­pli­er is oper­a­tional con­tract sup­port.

“Now, this is a matur­ing and evolv­ing mis­sion area that, 10 years ago, we had no doc­trine for and we did­n’t think about much,” he said. The gen­er­al used Iraq as an exam­ple. “Two years ago, we had 170,000 con­trac­tors [in Iraq],” he said. “They were pro­vid­ing a lot of logis­tic capa­bil­i­ties.”

Con­trac­tors han­dled food ser­vice, fuel, secu­ri­ty and the mis­sion. Bash cit­ed a Con­gres­sion­al Bud­get Office report that said the U.S. gov­ern­ment saved about 90 cents on the dol­lar by using con­trac­tors over uni­formed per­son­nel.

“How is that pos­si­ble?” he asked. “Well, you don’t have to recruit. You don’t have to train. You don’t have to retain. You don’t have pay and allowances. You don’t have retire­ments. You don’t have health care.

“That’s 170,000 peo­ple we would have had in uni­form to do the same job,” he con­tin­ued. “We were able to quick­ly expand and quick­ly retract.” He called this the epit­o­me of the “reversibil­i­ty” that defense lead­ers increas­ing­ly are talk­ing about in mil­i­tary strat­e­gy going for­ward.

A quote var­i­ous­ly attrib­uted to Gen. of the Army Dwight D. Eisen­how­er and Gen. of the Army Omar Bradley is: “Ama­teurs study strat­e­gy. Pro­fes­sion­als study logis­tics.” The U.S. mil­i­tary cer­tain­ly sub­scribes to this, Bash said.

The bot­tom line, he added, is that the logis­tics enter­prise sys­tem is healthy and able to do all the coun­try asks of it now. It needs study and care, how­ev­er, if it is to remain the world-class oper­a­tion for the future, he said.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →